![There is no single ethnogenesis. Every discipline can only reach its own restricted part of ethnogenesis: linguistics can only study the language, genetics can only study DNA, and archaeology can only study material remains of people and their culture. There is no obligation for all these different origins to agree with each other: they only meet momentarily and are not causally interdependent.
Most importantly, every discipline is independent from each other: linguistic results cannot be overruled by genetic or archaeological results any more than vice versa (…)
“Saaminess” appears different through the filter of different disciplines. From the linguistic perspective, [it] is connected to the root of language: we cannot label as Saami any people who did not speak any Saami language. From the genetic or archaeological perspective (…) there is no single definite trait which could be pointed out as the primary factor for “Saaminess”.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GG3gHyxX0AAj6Pv.png?name=small&format=webp)
ALT There is no single ethnogenesis. Every discipline can only reach its own restricted part of ethnogenesis: linguistics can only study the language, genetics can only study DNA, and archaeology can only study material remains of people and their culture. There is no obligation for all these different origins to agree with each other: they only meet momentarily and are not causally interdependent. Most importantly, every discipline is independent from each other: linguistic results cannot be overruled by genetic or archaeological results any more than vice versa (…) “Saaminess” appears different through the filter of different disciplines. From the linguistic perspective, [it] is connected to the root of language: we cannot label as Saami any people who did not speak any Saami language. From the genetic or archaeological perspective (…) there is no single definite trait which could be pointed out as the primary factor for “Saaminess”.















