Degeneve retweeted
$TAO Bittensor will soon give subnet owners more autonomy over how emissions are distributed.
If you’re a visual learner, this ELI5 video will probably help.
Get familiar with eTAO before it goes on-chain.
Your validator can keep doing its job and still have fewer rewards to share.
In $TAO Bittensor, the merged eTAO code would let subnet owners move alpha rewards from the validator bucket to miners. That could help fund the work a product needs, while leaving less for the alpha stakers paid from that bucket.
Root is paid from that bucket too. Protecting its calculated reference share doesn’t mean protecting your alpha staking yield.
Before choosing a position by APY, understand who can change the split. I followed 100 alpha through eTAO to show where the extra miner rewards come from and who receives less.
taooutsider.com/blog/etao-ex…
Degeneve retweeted
The main $SOL account mentioning a $TAO Bittensor subnet is really interesting.
This must mean something relevant happening here at @openroboto right?
JUST IN: SN80 (@openroboto), the largest robotics subnet on @bittensor, integrates peaqOS
All devices now have an ID and wallet on Solana, and can be verified and paid for their performance directly on Solana using @peaq
JUST IN: SN80 (@openroboto), the largest robotics subnet on @bittensor, integrates peaqOS
All devices now have an ID and wallet on Solana, and can be verified and paid for their performance directly on Solana using @peaq
Degeneve retweeted
I noticed there’s been some confusion around this update.
In simple terms it just increases the miner cap per subnet from 256 to 2,500.
This is great for subnets that experience UID pressure (miners hogging UIDs as a way to deter competition) or those with commodities that scale with the amount of miners (speed of data collection, amount of compute providers etc)
Degeneve retweeted
Null consensus scales Bittensor subnets 10x and allows POW registration (no Tao needed for an agent to mine).
First step adding more freedom and scale to our incentive systems.
Degeneve retweeted
Bittensor recently released Null Consensus, a major protocol update expanding subnet capacity from 256 to 2,500 participants.
It introduces a new way to determine miner rewards, giving subnet owners an alternative to Yuma Consensus.
Degeneve retweeted
Was invited to Exploit Summit this year but unfortunately couldn't make it.
Been following from the sidelines though and its honestly bonkers seeing the progress around $TAO.
So many SN's shipping, generating real revenue.
And const absolutely cooked with that opening speech.
Degeneve retweeted
Degeneve retweeted
The first Bittensor $TAO halving happened last year.
The next will be in 3 years.
Before this happens. The first SUBNETS halving will happen.
OG subnets are at about 25% of their total tokens already minted, which took about 1.5 years.
So in roughly 2 years you get the first subnet halving (after collecting 40% APY) and a year later the second $TAO halving.
Sure you can sell everything today... weak hands
Degeneve retweeted
The move that made everyone euphoric and screaming “bull market is back” is basically done.
There’s no fuel left.
I expect a full retrace from here and new lows after that.
$BTC
Degeneve retweeted
Je travaille dans le JV depuis 10ans et spécialement sur le gameplay et l’animation
Je peux vous dire que ce que vient de faire Rockstar, c’est au delà de tout ce que peut faire l’industrie.
Il suffit pas d’avoir le temps et l’argent. Il faut les talents. C’est très très fort…
Degeneve retweeted
V440 is presenting some interesting investment opportunities within the #bittensor ecosystem. a couple things I think every subnet investor should understand:
dynamics:
demand (newly introduced) is a function of price (EMA) and miner burn. smart subnets are reducing miner burn to 0.00. forcing burn to zero (eliminating mooches) is a primary consequence of the upgrade.
the demand bar (θ) is a *moving target.* it’s not as simple as “I’m going to buy the top 32 subnets.” it might be 18 or 48 at any given point in time depending on market dynamics; and the "top" subnets are fluid.
on that note: as an investor, make sure you define (and practically understand) what “top xx subnets” means. it’s not emissions or price; it’s demand. and demand is constantly changing as a function of 1) price and 2) miner burn.
what it means for your investment strategy:
understand why emissions are important. as an investor, you care about price (unless you’re “just here for the tech”). higher emissions *might* lead to higher price; but not necessarily (greater emission does not, in isolation, lead to higher price).
two high-priority reasons to watch (and perhaps prioritize) emissions:
1) chain buys. higher emissions can lead to more *chain buys* (chain buys are a function of alpha emitted and root prop). older subnets (lower root prop) have lower alpha emission caps. any emissions over the cap lead to chain buys that offset sell pressure.
so, the incremental benefit of emissions (in the form of chain buys and thereby increased price) will be higher for a subnet with lower root prop vs higher root prop (ie older subnets will typically benefit more). we are seeing this dynamic play out now with many OG subnets.
2) alpha halving. higher emissions *may* lead to an earlier subnet alpha halving (higher emissions => higher alpha_in, as long as emissions are below the cap; else the excess TAO will be used to buy back existing alpha which will be held by the chain).
the race to subnet halving is underway. subnets that hit alpha halving first should experience supply shock sooner, and prices should increase (perhaps dramatically) as a result. I still do not believe most subnet investors fully realize how constructive price action is going to be post- alpha halvings for individual subnets. buckle up.
other thoughts:
there are new trading strategies emerging post-V440. subnets with highest demand leverage sit right below the bar. you can track the bar, and consistently invest in mid- / small-caps right below it. as they pass the bar (due to higher relative EMA and/or lower relative miner burn) they will experience a dramatic increase in emissions that *may* lead to an increase in price.
many people have abandoned small cap subnets in the past week despite high-quality products /outputs / teams. I think this this is a mistake. smaller subnets can quickly regain a position above the bar with an increase in price driven by demand and/or positive business plan updates / adoption / announcements. consensus seems to be these subnets will go to 0.00; I actually think this is where some of the greatest current investment opportunity lies.
bottom line: the common consensus, which (at least according to my feed) seems to be “buy the top 32 subnets” is incomplete. 32 is a moving target, and many people don’t even know what “top” means.
do your research, and know what you should hold. good luck!!
$TAO #bittensor

























