again *looks confused* the "short form" formal def of Bisexual+ as used by reputable bisexual academics activist thought leaders + groups is
and now an even funnier thing is happening, modern brain scan etc research is showing the original idea (intersex) was correct & no 50/50
*looks confused* that isnt the "original" meaning of bisexual, that's Really Recent (1940-ish thru 1970-ish Mostly Monosexual researchers)
Replying to @Wraiyth @NoTotally
Wow really? Almost everyone I know uses it, happily it's SO useful. Filled an obvious gap in language: @MHarrisPerry youtu.be/KJOD_SYWKtI
Replying to @ShanelleLittle @NoTotally
Its such a useful word (btw Cis is short 4 Cisgender) & already the subject of many many memes ie "Support your Sisters not just Cis-ters"
Replying to @BisexualBlogger @queerroyalty
& heres a photo of the founders of @BiVisibilityDay in Johannesburg SA in 1999 3 #biactivists 1 NB, 1 Cis & 1 Intersex
1
Replying to @grubheadjones_ @queerroyalty
OMG that isn't correct at all! Terrible u were mislead by #acephobia #biphobia & #transphobia See this frm Trans-Bi+ activist
2
Yes & No 4 many thousands of yrs (at least in the west) Bisexuality was presumed to BE a variety of hermaphroditism of the mind
Replying to @elielcruz
Quoting @robynochs "I call myself #bisexual because..." If you dont know this youre not in tune w #bisexuals & the #bicommunity
2
Do you love reading & discussing #Bisexual+ #Books? Are you on #Facebook? Then come join the new #BiBook Chat Group facebook.com/groups/bibooks/
Replying to @StillBisexual
well you can always point them to the Dictionary
Replying to @ANoahB @_SecretChord_
Or maybe you were referring to this definition












