Every time someone calls Trump ‘most corrupt,’ send ‘em here. Not opinion. Just docs: declassified, Senate, courts. Clinton dossier? Bar talk. Jack Smith? $50M witch hunt, zero convictions. Epstein? They redacted the woman who cleared him. Facts don’t lie, leftists do.
❤️🇺🇸💪👇
Bill retweeted
Replying to @elonmusk
. @AnthropicAI should be doing this instead of their left-wing NGO crap
Bill retweeted
Outgoing Senator John Cornyn Sends Alarming Public Statement Via His X Account theconservativetreehouse.com…
Bill retweeted
Abdul El-Sayed has dual U.S.-Egyptian citizenship.
Egypt built a massive wall on the Gaza border and refuses to take poor Palestinians. They know Hamas is a terrorist threat and won’t import them.
El-Sayed never demands Egypt open its borders. He demands America does.
He wants the same people Egypt rejects flooding into the United States, the ones his own ancestral country treats as a national security risk.
He wants to import the very networks that destroy countries from the inside while his other country, Egypt, protects itself.
Bill retweeted
The guy who weaponized the IRS, FBI, CIA and DOJ against his political opposition is decrying govt targeting!
Hey @BarackObama, we can see you!
It is a basic principle of American democracy that the government can’t selectively target individuals simply because of their political beliefs or what they say. But that’s exactly what the Trump Administration is doing to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota.
To understand why this is so appalling, it’s important to know the facts. Congresswoman Omar came to this country with her father when she was 12 years old. Five years later, her father became a naturalized citizen. If Ilhan had been 18 at the time, she would have had to apply for citizenship separately. But because she was 17, she became a naturalized citizen automatically.
Congresswoman Omar went on to graduate from college, work as a community organizer, become the first Somali-American legislator elected to public office in the U.S., and win a seat in Congress. There, she has been one of the Trump Administration’s fiercest critics, which has led the president to repeatedly single her out as someone who he believes does not belong in this country.
Now the Administration is actively trying to deport Congresswoman Omar, seemingly based solely on the unsubstantiated theory that she was actually 18 when her father was naturalized, and therefore is not a citizen. Federal agents have raided her home, confiscated personal records, and seized her phone — all to try and uncover a nonexistent smoking gun from 20 years ago that will somehow make their case.
Think about that. The full weight of the federal government is being brought down on a law-abiding elected official because she has dared to criticize the president. And it’s not the first time this has happened. Under President Trump, the Justice Department has repeatedly gone after those he considers his political enemies — from the Attorney General of New York, to the former head of the FBI, to members of the Federal Reserve.
In those cases, the prosecutions either stalled or were dismissed for having no basis in law, and the same is likely to happen in this case. But not before Congresswoman Omar’s life has been turned upside down, her legal bills have piled up, and she’s been forced to spend time fighting unsubstantiated charges instead of serving the people of Minnesota.
The fact that any president, or any administration, is willing to engage in such transparent efforts to intimidate someone should outrage all Americans, regardless of how they feel about Congresswoman Omar’s political views. Because if this becomes the new normal, there’s no reason to believe it will stop with her — or that future presidents, in either party, won’t do the same.
Bill retweeted
Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D., Mich.) just gave an interview where she said the quiet part out loud. She intends to unleash a slew of investigations to deter young people from even considering supporting the Administration … if they know what is good for them. jonathanturley.org/2026/10/1…
Bill retweeted
🎯🎯🎯
We’ve lost the play in America.
We are in the midst of an international struggle as dire as the Cold War, but a non-serious Congress does not remotely act like it.
They proceed as if Ukraine is not a regional European problem that could and should be settled, while traitors within our country are tolerated and encouraged.
It’s backwards.
Bill retweeted
Get it straight 🤨! There will be lots of 👀 on this election!
Sending monitors to election polls does not sow distrust in elections—quite the contrary!
Tonight on @60Minutes, I explained it is routine for @theJusticeDept to monitor election sites to repair the distrust already present in the system due to voting irregularities.
Bill retweeted
I was told Drumpt was owned by Russia today 😆
President Trump, my friend Donald - thank you for your extraordinary endorsement. Israel has never had a greater friend in the White House. Together we will never let Iran's regime get nuclear weapons. Thank you for your clarity, courage and unwavering support.
@realDonaldTrump
This right here is how peaceful protests work! 👇
Hey, @EmmanuelMacron 👋🏼🤡
500,000 Iranians took to the streets protesting in Toronto
250,000 in Munich,
and many other cities across the world were protesting against the very same terrorists you legitimize and aid for the past 48 years.
Not a single glass was shattered.
Not one shop was looted.
Not one church or synagogue was burnt.
Not a single piece of litter on the streets.
Police received flowers and hugs.
Take some responsibility for once, you dung gobbler.
Bill retweeted
Anyone who still doubts that lawfare will only get worse needs to listen to Elissa Slotkin. She sounds like a Soviet party apparatchik calmly explaining how she will use political prosecutions to terrorize political opponents and intimidate ordinary people away from participating in politics altogether. Except a Soviet apparatchik probably wouldn't have talked about it so openly. But Slotkin couldn't care less. The entire lawfare machine has become so emboldened by the total lack of accountability that they no longer bother hiding their plans.
ON UCHICAGO CAMPUS: U.S. Senator from Michigan Elissa Slotkin hopes planned political prosecutions of republican leaders will scare young conservatives from getting involved in politics.
@ElissaSlotkin
Bill retweeted
I honestly do not understand how any American who is not already a literal Communist or a literal Jihadist could vote Democrat after hearing what Slotkin said below.
This is LITERALLY totalitarianism. It's not the fake "fascism" the Left likes to accuse the Right of, it is the REAL THING.
Undeniably.
Irrefutably.
This is a sitting member of Congress who was in the CIA saying that dissent from what she believes will result in imprisonment.
This is straight out of Solzhenitsyn. Straight out of Orwell. This is something an early Nazi would have said in 1932 under the Weimar Republic.
Please please PLEASE share her words with everyone you know. The Democrat/Media Complex will try to bury this. It is up to us on social media, on blogs and via texts and emails to get the word out.
The only way to stop these monsters is to make sure that voters who don't really keep up on politics understand the actual threat, see it with their own eyes and hear it with their own ears.
Please. Spread the word to anyone who will listen. And even those who won't listen.
ON UCHICAGO CAMPUS: U.S. Senator from Michigan Elissa Slotkin hopes planned political prosecutions of republican leaders will scare young conservatives from getting involved in politics.
@ElissaSlotkin
Bill retweeted
Slotkin.
What can men do against such reckless hate?
youtube.com/watch?v=2m2-8Co8…
ON UCHICAGO CAMPUS: U.S. Senator from Michigan Elissa Slotkin hopes planned political prosecutions of republican leaders will scare young conservatives from getting involved in politics.
@ElissaSlotkin
Bill retweeted
Replying to @CynicalPublius
CIA scum--like Slotkin and Spanberger--will be CIA scum.
They lack the mental and moral wherewithal to be anything better.
Bill retweeted
The Islamist revolution that seized Iran was organized from France in 1978, and after nearly 50 years of appeasing Islamism and the far left, the consequences have returned to France with a vengeance.
France gave Ruhollah Khomeini sanctuary in Neauphle-le-Château, where he recorded revolutionary messages, coordinated with supporters and prepared his return to Iran. He then flew to Tehran aboard an Air France aircraft and established the Islamic Republic.
France did not invent Islamism, but it gave Khomeini a protected platform at the decisive moment when he transformed revolutionary Islamism into state power. His regime then exported that ideology across the Middle East through terrorism, proxy armies, religious radicalization and perpetual war.
Now Macron is blaming the Persian Gulf conflict for France’s riots instead of confronting his government’s failed migration and integration policies and the violence of the far left.
After protests over fuel prices and living costs descended into rioting, looting and arson, Macron claimed that public anger originated in a conflict France did not start and is now being forced to suffer from.
That explanation is politically convenient and historically blind.
The Islamic Republic is not a passive victim of war. For decades, it has threatened shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, armed proxies that attack energy infrastructure and treated global oil supplies as leverage against its enemies.
The regime helped create the instability now raising fuel prices. Macron reduces that record to a vague “conflict,” erasing the Islamic Republic’s responsibility for weaponizing the Persian Gulf and holding international commerce hostage.
There is a grim poetic justice in France now suffering the consequences of the political forces it spent decades excusing.
French governments repeatedly underestimated Islamism, failed to integrate large migrant communities and allowed parallel societies and ideological radicalization to deepen. At the same time, parts of the far left normalized political violence and formed opportunistic alliances with Islamist movements under the language of anti-imperialism and resistance.
Expensive fuel may explain public anger, but it does not explain organized looting, arson or attacks on public property. A conflict in the Persian Gulf did not create France’s domestic fractures. It exposed them.
Macron’s argument also carries an ugly implication for Iranians. If confronting the Islamic Republic raises European fuel prices, then Iranians are expected to remain trapped under a theocracy so Europeans can preserve cheap energy and political comfort.
France once sheltered the man who helped place revolutionary Islamism at the centre of Middle Eastern politics. Almost 50 years later, the regime he founded is destabilizing energy markets abroad while the ideological forces France failed to confront are helping tear at the country from within.
That is not simply historical irony. It is the bill for decades of denial finally coming due.
Bill retweeted
BREAKING: A Republican Super PAC releases the following ad: “Michael is a normal guy. He loves a tailgate and he kinda hates politics. He was ready to skip voting this year. But he remembered Democrats are crazier than his ex.”
Don’t miss it folks! America is racing forward in every area that matters most. It will only get more evident as this 47th President’s term continues. ❤️🇺🇸💪👇
Beard Blather 346:
"You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet."
With @Debradelai & @TheThomasWictor
Ten years.
That’s the span.
Technology. Geopolitics. Energy. Manufacturing. Agriculture. Medicine. Communications. Finance. Every domain that actually determines who eats, who moves, who decides, and who survives.
The changes these past ten years have been dramatic. To say the least.
We did not crawl from one generation of war to the next. We leapt. Fifth-generation warfare—information, networks, deniable operations, the quiet contest for legitimacy and cognition—gave way, almost overnight, to something that looks like the opening frames of Star Wars. Directed energy. Autonomous swarms. Orbital assets. Synthetic intelligence operating inside the kill chain. We skipped the polite intermediate steps. There was no long, orderly transition. One day the manuals still assumed a pilot in the cockpit and a battalion on the ground. The next day the decisive systems were already flying, listening, jamming, and deciding without either.
Artificial intelligence—or synthetic intelligence, if you prefer the sharper term—has fused with cyber and electronic warfare into a single continuous sphere. That sphere is no longer adjacent to conventional forces. It is wired into them. Sensors, shooters, logistics, command, and the cognitive layer that tells a commander what is real all operate as one system. The result is simple and permanent: the battlefield has changed. You no longer need to see the planes. You no longer need to see the soldiers. When the networks are contested, the satellites are blinded, the drones are hunting, and the electrons are deciding who lives and who dies, the war is already underway. Visibility is optional. Effect is not.
Yesterday’s superpowers are discovering this in real time. Forces that, on paper, should not be able to contest them are doing exactly that. The edge is not mass. It is not legacy platforms. It is the ability to design, iterate, and employ drones—and the cheap, disposable, intelligent systems that surround them—faster than the opponent can adapt. Quantity of expensive machines is losing to quantity of smart, inexpensive machines guided by better software and tighter feedback loops. The old hierarchy of power is being rewritten in the field, not in the staff college.
China is still spending its last large piles of capital chasing the previous form of superiority. It wants the carriers, the stealth fighters, the big missiles, the prestige of a conventional peer force. That chase is already obsolete so long as the United States retains the lead in the technologies that actually matter, in the resourcefulness that turns those technologies into working systems under pressure, and in the economic depth that funds the next iteration while the previous one is still being fielded. Conventional parity purchased with yesterday’s money will not close a gap that is widening in the domains that now decide outcomes.
The same correction is visible in politics. The sophomoric bumper-sticker slogans of the pothead left—the slogans that treated complex societies as morality plays and treated trade-offs as moral failures—are already being discarded. They never reached full bloom. Reality is reasserting itself across continents. Sometimes it reasserts itself despite the shrieks of the deluded. Sometimes it reasserts itself because those shrieks finally exhausted the patience of people who still have to live with the consequences.
Look at the calendar. Elections in France, in the United States, in Brazil, and in Spain are approaching. Each one is another nail in the coffin of the latter-day Trotskyites—the permanent revolutionaries who believed institutions, borders, energy systems, and basic competence could be dismantled without cost. The bill is arriving. Voters are noticing.
The pace is still accelerating. Nothing in the last ten years suggests the next ten will be slower. Systems that once took decades to mature now turn over in years. Coalitions that once looked permanent are fracturing under the weight of results. Capabilities that were science fiction a decade ago are in operational use today.
We have not seen it all.
We have barely seen the beginning.
In fact… We ain’t seen nothing yet.
Saturdays, LIVE
11:00pm Eastern / 8:00pm Pacific
odysee.com/@QuodVerumTV:3/BB…
youtube.com/live/oipBgX0owPo
Bill retweeted
Join us for a lively, intelligent conversation! You don't want to miss out.
Beard Blather 346:
"You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet."
With @Debradelai & @TheThomasWictor
Ten years.
That’s the span.
Technology. Geopolitics. Energy. Manufacturing. Agriculture. Medicine. Communications. Finance. Every domain that actually determines who eats, who moves, who decides, and who survives.
The changes these past ten years have been dramatic. To say the least.
We did not crawl from one generation of war to the next. We leapt. Fifth-generation warfare—information, networks, deniable operations, the quiet contest for legitimacy and cognition—gave way, almost overnight, to something that looks like the opening frames of Star Wars. Directed energy. Autonomous swarms. Orbital assets. Synthetic intelligence operating inside the kill chain. We skipped the polite intermediate steps. There was no long, orderly transition. One day the manuals still assumed a pilot in the cockpit and a battalion on the ground. The next day the decisive systems were already flying, listening, jamming, and deciding without either.
Artificial intelligence—or synthetic intelligence, if you prefer the sharper term—has fused with cyber and electronic warfare into a single continuous sphere. That sphere is no longer adjacent to conventional forces. It is wired into them. Sensors, shooters, logistics, command, and the cognitive layer that tells a commander what is real all operate as one system. The result is simple and permanent: the battlefield has changed. You no longer need to see the planes. You no longer need to see the soldiers. When the networks are contested, the satellites are blinded, the drones are hunting, and the electrons are deciding who lives and who dies, the war is already underway. Visibility is optional. Effect is not.
Yesterday’s superpowers are discovering this in real time. Forces that, on paper, should not be able to contest them are doing exactly that. The edge is not mass. It is not legacy platforms. It is the ability to design, iterate, and employ drones—and the cheap, disposable, intelligent systems that surround them—faster than the opponent can adapt. Quantity of expensive machines is losing to quantity of smart, inexpensive machines guided by better software and tighter feedback loops. The old hierarchy of power is being rewritten in the field, not in the staff college.
China is still spending its last large piles of capital chasing the previous form of superiority. It wants the carriers, the stealth fighters, the big missiles, the prestige of a conventional peer force. That chase is already obsolete so long as the United States retains the lead in the technologies that actually matter, in the resourcefulness that turns those technologies into working systems under pressure, and in the economic depth that funds the next iteration while the previous one is still being fielded. Conventional parity purchased with yesterday’s money will not close a gap that is widening in the domains that now decide outcomes.
The same correction is visible in politics. The sophomoric bumper-sticker slogans of the pothead left—the slogans that treated complex societies as morality plays and treated trade-offs as moral failures—are already being discarded. They never reached full bloom. Reality is reasserting itself across continents. Sometimes it reasserts itself despite the shrieks of the deluded. Sometimes it reasserts itself because those shrieks finally exhausted the patience of people who still have to live with the consequences.
Look at the calendar. Elections in France, in the United States, in Brazil, and in Spain are approaching. Each one is another nail in the coffin of the latter-day Trotskyites—the permanent revolutionaries who believed institutions, borders, energy systems, and basic competence could be dismantled without cost. The bill is arriving. Voters are noticing.
The pace is still accelerating. Nothing in the last ten years suggests the next ten will be slower. Systems that once took decades to mature now turn over in years. Coalitions that once looked permanent are fracturing under the weight of results. Capabilities that were science fiction a decade ago are in operational use today.
We have not seen it all.
We have barely seen the beginning.
In fact… We ain’t seen nothing yet.
Saturdays, LIVE
11:00pm Eastern / 8:00pm Pacific
odysee.com/@QuodVerumTV:3/BB…
youtube.com/live/oipBgX0owPo
Bill retweeted
“Iran is not a chessboard for your ideological battles. Our suffering is not yours to interpret to fit your politics. If you genuinely care about human rights and the Iranian people, start by listening to us, even when our voices challenge your ideology.”
Many have not listened. Fact is you can speak over Iranian voices and spew your bile over western media. That’s free speech. But it comes with consequences. The very tales you spin are narratives that keep a regime in power that continue to execute innocent protesters, some as young as 17, at a rate of 6 a day.
Bill retweeted
NEW: In a new letter to LA County, the DOJ warns that if the County allows ballot processors to tabulate the votes of alleged non-citizens, they are opening themself to federal criminal prosecution.
"If persons knowingly tabulate ballots cast by individuals identified by federal agencies as noncitizens, they risk becoming aiders and abettors to a federal crime."
































