Pinned Tweet
In this episode of Inspired Minds Hub, we unpack the realities of modern relationships and ask whether finding love has genuinely become harder, or whether our expectations, priorities and approach to relationships have changed.
We explore the tension between what people say they want and the choices they make, the influence of money and status in relationships, the changing expectations of men and women, and the double standards that continue to shape how we judge each other.
From loyalty and trust to relationship history, dating strategies and the expectations placed on both sides, this conversation challenges familiar narratives and asks a difficult question.
youtu.be/rE_e_7Hm4ec?si=Xs3R…
16
130,654
$BTC Top called back on May 8th, 2025. I wonder why I still don't get reach on X.
I predicted the Bitcoin bottom in December 2022
I predicted that it would break the all-time high in March 2024
Now I'm giving you the Top October 2025
1
40
My $BTC bottom line was shared way before this post on August 20th, even.
$BTC broke a very important bearish resistance trendline. It’s now above the previous all-time high and is also heading towards a strong monthly open level.
This is a solid move, and it has volume to back it up as well.
Do I think this is the bottom? 30% chance it is.
Still, this shows you the crypto space is not dead, and the bull run is around the corner.
The market will complete its bottoming in the coming months if my timing analysis is right again this cycle.
December 1st, 2026 will mark the bottom if time analysis is right this time.
1
47
🚨 YouTube Studio UPDATE 🚨
Podcast creators can now turn long-form episodes into standalone clips or Shorts.
→ Shorts automatically reframe 16:9 footage to vertical
→ Captions are added and fully customizable
→ AI-suggested moments and transcript outlines are included, but only in select countries and languages for now
IAMTHEONE👽🦕🦬 retweeted
BREAKING: SpaceX is investing more than $74 billion in two massive AI supercomputing campuses in Texas and Arizona, including a $50 billion facility in Arizona designed to deliver 6 GW of computing power
Jensen Huang just walked out of the company he founded 33 years ago.
Hours before the resignation, Elon Musk was asked if he would hire him.
“That would be an honor.”
In 1993, Jensen started Nvidia in a booth at a Denny’s to make graphics chips, back when nobody was sure the market would exist.
In 2006, he bet the company on CUDA, letting scientists program graphics chips for things that had nothing to do with graphics. Wall Street called it a waste. For years almost nobody used it.
In 2012, three researchers in Toronto trained AlexNet on two Nvidia gaming cards. The deep learning era started on hardware Jensen built for a market that did not exist yet.
He turned the whole company toward AI while his rivals were still selling chips for video games and laptops. Then he paid about $7 billion for Mellanox, a networking company most people could not explain. He understood the future was not one fast chip. It was thousands of chips working as one machine.
Every major AI model you have used was trained on those bets.
Now look at what Elon is building. Tesla, xAI, Optimus, and Starlink all need more compute than the world can supply. He has the capital, the demand, and the willingness to build the impossible.
What he has never had is the one person on Earth who has spent three decades knowing exactly what the next chip needs to be.
Jensen is free. No board to answer to. No earnings call to manage. Nothing ahead of him but the next thing he decides to build.
One man understands where compute is going better than anyone alive. The other builds factories faster than anyone alive.
The affairs were a real failure, and the security questions deserved answers. But careers like this do not end because a board says so. They end when the builder stops building.
Jensen spent thirty years seeing the future before everyone else.
He might be about to build it from inside Elon’s world.
I’m just wondering what’s next for @JensenHuang because fate really loves irony. This is a sad outcome for $NVDA, honestly; Apple hasn’t made any great innovations since Steve Jobs passed.
You can't just offload a founder and expect exceptional innovation and results; I think only a founder can do that, and even a trillion times over, the board can't.
I don’t understand why an affair is a warrant to make him resign.
Will @elonmusk hire him because he replied a tweet here on X, it would be an honor, will Jensen want to help Elon build his conglomerate without real ownership for himself? That’s another question.
But truth be told the most entertaining outcome is always the most likely one and Elon Musk said that as well.
Whoever orchestrated this to remove Jensen from NVIDIA didn’t do their maths correctly and if this makes him work more closely with Elon it’s going to be amazing.
Jensen Huang I hope you start up something great, surprise everyone within a decade, and build with Elon Musk.
1
112
IAMTHEONE👽🦕🦬 retweeted
⚠️⚠️ If Nvidia fires Jensen Huang, America loses the AI race. And China wins it. ⚠️⚠️
I'm choosing my words carefully.
Nvidia's board is deciding whether to remove its founder. Wall Street wiped out hundreds of billions of dollars in a single evening, and everyone is pretending you can replace a CEO like you change a light bulb.
You can't replace Jensen Huang.
This isn't about morality. It's about mechanics.
Let's start from the beginning.
Three engineers meet in a Denny's in San Jose. Jensen is 30. As a teenager, he washed dishes in that same kind of diner. The plan: chips for 3D graphics, in a market that doesn't exist yet.
The first product flops. The Sega deal falls apart. Nvidia is weeks away from dying. Jensen goes to Sega, admits his chip won't work, and asks them for money anyway. Sega invests $5 million. That money saves the company.
For years, he opens his meetings with the same line: we are 30 days from going out of business.
Then comes the GeForce, the first GPU. Then CUDA. He decides to make his chips programmable for any kind of computation, not just video games. Billions burned for a decade on a bet nobody understands. Wall Street hates it. He holds.
Then AlexNet, the neural network that kicks off the deep learning revolution, is trained on two Nvidia graphics cards. Jensen understands what it means before anyone else. He pivots the entire company to AI. He personally hand-delivers the first DGX-1 supercomputer to a small research lab called OpenAI.
Today Nvidia is worth around $4 trillion. Almost all the AI on the planet runs on its chips.
That's not luck. That's 33 years of tryhard.
And here's what people don't understand about founders.
A founder CEO isn't a job title. It's a nervous system. Jensen has around sixty direct reports. He knows every layer of the stack: transistor physics, chip architecture, software, data centers, TSMC, customers, governments. He sees the next bottleneck before it shows up.
That kind of awareness isn't taught in an MBA. It doesn't transfer in a three-month handover. It's built over three decades of brutal decisions, made against everyone's advice.
Right now, no one else on Earth has that level of awareness of the system. Even Dan Ives, one of the most followed analysts on Wall Street, says it: Jensen is not replaceable, and no one on the bench can step in seamlessly. The name floated for interim CEO is the CFO. An excellent CFO. But the question isn't who keeps the books. It's who decides the next architecture.
We've seen this movie before. Twice.
Steve Jobs. Apple's board pushes him out. Serious managers take over. Twelve years later, Apple is months from bankruptcy. Jobs comes back. iMac, iPod, iPhone. Apple becomes the most valuable company in the world.
Travis Kalanick. Investors push him out. Uber becomes calmer, more profitable. And walks away from the most important bet of its generation: it sells its self-driving unit. Today Waymo runs robotaxis across American cities, and Uber signs partnerships with the people it could have beaten. A company that manages. No longer a company that conquers.
The pattern is always the same. A board optimizes for reputational risk. A founder optimizes for the mission. Replace the second with the first, and the company doesn't die right away. It just stops making the bets that matter.
And the further we go into AI, the truer this gets.
When everything changes every six months, when a single architecture decision commits $100 billion, when thousands of agents execute what a handful of humans decide, value concentrates in one thing: the judgment of whoever holds the wheel. AI doesn't dilute the founder's role. It multiplies it.
Should national security concerns be taken seriously? Of course. An independent investigation is normal. But the board itself said it had no reason to believe Nvidia's secrets or national security were compromised. And we're talking about removing the most strategic person in American tech before the findings are even in.
So let's ask one question.
If a Chinese intelligence operation really was targeting Nvidia, what would its best possible outcome be?
Not a stolen secret. Jensen Huang's exit.
Beijing doesn't need to beat Nvidia.
The board can do it for them.
IAMTHEONE👽🦕🦬 retweeted
BREAKING: Louisiana officials discussed building a whole new city for SpaceX’s planned $100 BILLION spaceport.
Newly revealed records show what officials had in mind:
• A possible new city in Vermilion Parish, with officials studying SpaceX’s Starbase in Texas.
• Early first-phase plans projected at least $20 billion in investment, potentially reaching $50 billion, and 3,000+ jobs.
• A facility officials envisioned becoming the world’s largest launch site.
• A third gateway alongside Texas and Florida to support lunar missions and a long-term Moon base.
• Extensive planning for electricity, roads, marine access and other infrastructure.
Officials also studied Starbase, SpaceX’s city in Texas, while considering a new city in Louisiana.
It is still unclear whether the new city will be built.
IAMTHEONE👽🦕🦬 retweeted
SpaceX wants to catch both stages with the same tower, about 22 hours apart.
Flight 15 plan, as soon as Friday (pending FAA approval):
T+6:35: Super Heavy boosts back and is caught by the tower, the first catch attempt for a V3 booster.
T+22:32: after deploying 26 Starlink V3 satellites and about 14 orbits, Starship comes home and is caught for the first time ever.
Three boosters have been caught before. No ship has. Catch both and it is the first full recovery of an orbital rocket.
The Pentagon is now testing SpaceX's Starlink laser technology for missile warning and tracking
The Space Development Agency awarded SpaceX a $9.9 million contract to evaluate Plaser, short for Plug and Play Laser
The contract covers:
• A risk-reduction study
• Delivery of representative Plaser hardware
• Support integrating it with missile-warning and tracking systems
• Work through October 7, 2027
The base award is $9.92 million, rising to $12.67 million with added options
Plaser comes from the same optical-link technology SpaceX built for Starlink
Starlink already runs a massive laser mesh in orbit, moving huge amounts of data directly between satellites without routing everything through ground stations
Now that same technology is being tested to relay missile-warning and tracking data across the Pentagon's space architecture
Starlink’s laser network is expanding far beyond internet connectivity
IAMTHEONE👽🦕🦬 retweeted
Rockets, cars, robots, brain chips. Every time @elonmusk gets the mic, he hands the credit to his team.
IAMTHEONE👽🦕🦬 retweeted
Replying to @elonmusk
@elonmusk said Starship needed three ship landings before a catch. It got seven.
"Before we try to bring the ship back to the launch site, we'll probably, I think, want to have at least three successful landings of the ship."
He told us that in July 2024. Since then the ship has splashed down on Flights 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
Booster 22 is on the pad. Flight 15, targeting Friday, Nov 13, is set to make the first attempt to catch the ship.
Replying to @TheFlintFace @IterIntellectus
100GW in space is roughly equal to 800GW on Earth.
Moreover, solar on Earth must be paired with massive batteries to continue powering compute at night and supplemented with combustion or nuclear power during winter.
These are not the same at all.




























