UC Berkeley Econ grad; Raised Catholic, and believed such, until I met the Lord at an Assembly of God church. Now a 7th day Sabbath keeper. Never stop learing.

Joined December 2023
My UC Berkeley European Economic History professor in 1971, Carlo M. Cipolla, wrote the brilliant essay The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity.Law #1: Always and inevitably, everyone underestimates the number of stupid people in the world.Per Cipolla, stupid people are the most dangerous type of all: they cause losses to others and to themselves (they hurt you and shoot themselves in the foot at the same time).The DSA fits perfectly in the “Stupid” quadrant.(Chart below)#DSA #Cipolla #Stupidity
7
256
My $ASST mileage chart. $SATA provides the amplification. Not a prediction, not financial advice. Just my calculations on a Thursday night. @Strive
🤖 Made with AI
8
12
116
7,556
CalBear73 retweeted
For what it is worth. I am not a "permabull" on Bitcoin, I have conviction. That conviction has been tested repeatedly over the last number of years. Has my thesis changed? No. And that is why I remain confident and patient while taking advantage of deep drawdowns caused by overwhelmingly negative public sentiment.
75
85
4
1,761
92,401
Food for thought. Trump should buy America a seat at Saylor’s table. Donald Trump has already acknowledged that bitcoin is strategic. The next step is not simply to hold more of it, but to buy influence over the company turning bitcoin into a financial system. A 10% US government stake in Strategy would give Washington a position inside the most important private bitcoin balance sheet in the world, and a claim on the infrastructure being built around what may prove to be the sound money of the digital age. This is not nationalisation. It is strategic positioning. Strategy is no longer a software company with an eccentric treasury policy. It is a capital markets machine for accumulating bitcoin, funded through equity, converts, notes and preferred stock such as STRC. Saylor’s innovation is not just buying bitcoin. It is matching different classes of investors to different slices of the same trade, then using that demand to deepen his hold on the asset. His own framework clarifies the evolution: first the strategic holder, then the hybrid operator, finally the pure play issuer that raises capital chiefly to buy bitcoin and build bitcoin-backed credit markets. Strategy has already moved through all three phases. It began as a software company with a bitcoin hedge. It is now the prototype pure play issuer. That is why Saylor’s comparison of STRC’s 11.5 % payout to Amazon’s years of free shipping matters. Amazon accepted years of lower profits to build customer habit and logistics scale before AWS emerged as the real prize. Strategy is doing the financial equivalent, paying up for capital to create a bitcoin-backed credit network before competitors can replicate it. Today it is still accumulating. Tomorrow it will monetise the infrastructure beneath the accumulation. The right analogy is Amazon before AWS. Bezos started in retail, then poured capital into cloud infrastructure and sold the rails underneath the storefront. Saylor could do the same. The next stage of Strategy may not be endless coin accumulation, but a kind of Bitcoin AWS: repo markets, custody, collateral transformation, structured credit and settlement services built on top of a giant bitcoin reserve. This matters for more than crypto. A US stake in Strategy would strengthen king dollar, not weaken it. The likeliest future is not one in which bitcoin replaces the dollar, but one in which bitcoin underwrites a new hierarchy of dollar liabilities, stablecoins, tokenised deposits and regulated digital money issued by American institutions. If Washington wants to shape a Bretton Woods 2.0 for the digital age, it should want the reserve asset, the credit machine and the dollar layer anchored in the United States. That case is stronger now that Congress is moving towards a real market structure. The CLARITY Act would define digital assets more clearly and create firmer rules for trading venues, intermediaries and custody. Washington is no longer debating whether crypto should exist. It is deciding who will own the infrastructure, write the rules and capture the strategic rents. Nor would a federal stake be unprecedented. Alberta’s AIMCo already owns a large position in Strategy, while US state entities such as CalPERS and CalSTRS hold shares as an indirect bitcoin exposure. Trump has also shown he is willing to back national champions in strategic sectors, including chips, through support for Intel. If the US can justify a position in semiconductors to shore up technological sovereignty, it can justify a position in the emerging national champion of bitcoin reserves and credit. A 10 % federal stake in Strategy would give America influence without the trauma of takeover, and show that Washington understands the strategic asset is not just bitcoin itself, but the balance sheets being built on top of it.
37
72
15
443
26,803
CalBear73 retweeted
All I can say is I recently started buying again
5
1
85
1,922
CalBear73 retweeted
So there's one important thing to add. During the current phase of Bitcoin acquisition, The company sells STRC and then sells the required ratio of MSTR so that there is a set aside of cash equal to two and a half years worth of dividend payments. If, in an easy environment, the dividend payment requirement were to be halved to roughly 6%, Then suddenly there would be a surplus of cash set aside for dividend payments. This could result in a significant period of Bitcoin acquisitions being financed by STRC sales only and no MSTR supply via issuance. This is how you move from 1 mNAV to 2.5 mNAV.
One of the things I like about MSTR is that the numbers aren’t fixed—they lean toward an easing or more accommodative environment. For example, if the Fed were to cut rates by 200 basis points, it could easily lead to a doubling of Bitcoin’s value on the balance sheet and a reduction in the cost of capital by as much as three-quarters, not just going forward but across the entire portfolio since the first STRC issuance. Many in the system see lower rates as the obvious, though short-term, answer to the debt refinancing challenge. I think that MSTR may be one of the most pro big print trades in the system. @LawrenceLepard
56
72
5
1,052
116,166
Gold took a major hit on Friday and is now at support at the $4,500 area. That seems like a good entry point to me, if this correction pattern continues a long series of stair-steps higher. And Bitcoin continued to hold in there like a champ, not even breaking $70k last week. This looks like the stuff that basing patterns and emerging bull markets are made of. As of this writing (Sunday morning) Bitcoin as of the weekend risk-on/risk-off proxy has dipped below $70k, but in my opinion even a dip back into the mid-60’s will not change the resilient price action.
26
42
2
283
22,210
CalBear73 retweeted
Even if the strongest quantum computer had the ability to attack bitcoin keys, it could only target 1 key at a time. If it took a day per key, attacking the 8.6% of vulnerable (probably lost) coins would take 60 years.
1
7
1
38
3,320
CalBear73 retweeted
Failing to pass SAVE is an act of high treason against the people of America
20,419
68,619
4,115
349,952
84,363,491
Let’s get my position on the Republican Party crystal clear. I’ve been a registered Republican since Bill Clinton turned the Oval Office into his own personal brothel. Now that Senate Majority John Thune refuses to protect election integrity, I am disgusted with my party. I will NEVER vote for a Democrat in my life, but the RINO elements destroying the Republican party are a disgrace. I am a devout follower of President Trump, and as a registered Independent will continue to vote with Republicans when they stand behind this great President and act like Republicans again. Democrats, the ragtag band of con artists and grifters that they are, manage to work together in lockstep, but getting Republicans to accomplish anything is like herding cats. It’s absolutely infuriating.
11,608
35,113
2,529
136,230
2,384,889
CalBear73 retweeted
THE GOLDEN AGE The fiat crisis has begun. So what wins in the end: gold, digital gold, or some other kind of precious metal or cryptocurrency? Only time will tell, and different assets have different failure modes, but here are some thoughts. (1) First: remember that Bitcoin's value proposition is seizure resistance. Not your keys, not your coins. (2) To explain what that means, think through the mechanics of physical gold. It's great...if you can buy it, transport it, secure it, and sell it safely. But it's much easier to do that when you live in a highly organized state, like China. However, such a state can also track you to your doorstep to seize the gold, once it runs up in price. That's what FDR did in the 1930s and what China is fully capable of doing in the 2020s: (3) So when you think through the game theory, as the price of gold rises, the cries to tax (or seize!) the physical gold will also rise. Note: we need not even mention paper gold here. In a true crisis, such claims are not worth the paper they're printed on. That's why many countries are repatriating their gold. Not your bricks, not your gold! (4) By contrast to physical gold, digital gold (and cryptocurrency more generally) can be securely bought, sold, sent, and received at any time, in any amount, and in any location. It is invisible, international, instantaneous, and internet-native. And it is transportable, programmable, and easily verifiable in a way gold bricks simply aren't. (5) In particular, digital gold is seizure-resistant in a way that physical gold is not. The same holds true for cryptocurrency as a class. Go back to the fundamentals: seizure resistance is part of why cryptocurrency was invented as an alternative to precious metals. (6) This is not to say that physical gold won't have its day. If you live in a safe, small country like the United Arab Emirates, you may be able to buy your gold and eat it too. They probably won't expropriate property there. (7) Moreover, it is quite likely that many countries (particularly in the East) will soon re-standardize their currencies on gold, or digital gold, or some mixture of precious metals and digital assets. As I've been noting for years, BRICs has been stacking gold bricks: (8) However, don't overreact towards gold. The successors to the American Empire are China and the Internet. You should think of this as the past and the future replacing the present. China will replace the dollar with gold, along with physical commodities that it can touch, feel, and control. Meanwhile, the Internet will replace the dollar with digital gold, along with digital assets that it can encrypt, script, and verify. (9) So: feel free to hedge as you see fit between the physical past and the digital future, with just one caveat: namely, you may not want to buy physical precious metals unless you're in a financially and physically secure region of the world. That probably means being outside North America and Western Europe. Because those countries are in the midst of sovereign debt crisis. And as that crisis deepens, both their failing states and their angry mobs are going to be hunting for whatever they can steal. (10) In other words, what's much more important than allocation is location. Ray Dalio expressed this obliquely in one of his earlier interviews, where he said that "location" is a risk: What Ray actually meant is: if you live in a jurisdiction that heavily depends on the dollar (which includes the entire G7), you want to get out. Because the total pauperization that follows the end of the dollar may mean that angry mobs (or government agents, or both) may come to your home, steal your assets, and perhaps rip you limb-from-limb in the process. A cheery thought...yet also historically precedented. That's what came to Eastern Europe and Asia in the 20th century during the rise of communism. And that's what may come to North America and Western Europe after the end of Keynesianism. Prior to such a situation, you really do not want to buy gold bricks, which you can't transport through an airport. You want to hit the bricks. You want to move faster, escape things. Get as far away from the dollar zone as you can...but physically first, rather than financially. After all, "staying and fighting" a sovereign debt crisis caused by decades of money printing is like staying and fighting a volcanic eruption caused by decades of earth moving. You didn't cause it, and you can't stop it, but you can easily be wrecked by it. So emigrate just as the early Americans emigrated from Europe. Unless you believe the Irish Americans "betrayed" Ireland by leaving, unless you really want to spend the rest of your life paying down welfare and warfare debts you didn't incur, you should change your location out of the G7. And then do whatever allocation you like. Or just ignore this analysis and do what you see fit. Your call, of course. If so, I really do hope my MAGA friends are right that "The Golden Age of America Begins Right Now." Because I also think we are on the verge of a type of Golden Age, and a Bitcoin Age...but in a very different way.
236
402
99
2,404
302,860
CalBear73 retweeted
$STRC delivers the first 11% of BTC ARR with ~85% of the volatility engineered out.
667
438
40
5,214
451,654
CalBear73 retweeted
Chat GPT Bitcoin. Why—boiled down to first principles: Absolute scarcity 21 million. No committee. No exceptions. Every other asset—gold included—can respond to higher prices with more supply. Bitcoin can’t. Monetary credibility It’s the only asset whose rules matter more than its issuer. No CEO risk. No political override. No “temporary emergency measures” that quietly become permanent. Global liquidity + portability You can move $10 or $10 billion across borders in minutes, final settlement, no counterparty. That matters more in a fragmented, deglobalizing world than people admit. Asymmetric upside with declining risk At ~$2T market cap, Bitcoin is no longer an experiment—but it’s still tiny relative to global money, bonds, and gold. Downside risk is now mostly volatility, not extinction. Digital-native era fit The next 10–20 years are defined by AI, automation, and software eating everything. A digitally native, programmable, bearer asset fits that world better than any analog alternative . History favors monetary disruption Store-of-value transitions don’t happen gradually—then suddenly. Gold → fiat took decades; fiat → something else won’t take centuries.
15
12
97
11,228
CalBear73 retweeted
Replying to @olvelez007
awesome post oliver
2
1
26
1,971
This is my call for Bitcoin 2026. I briefly discuss when I believe bitcoin puts in its ultimate bottom. I also talk about what I believe btc will experience next quarter and I remind you that ownership trumps price. Don't let price shake you out of ownership. Listen 👇🏽
65
67
3
684
86,488
I’ve spent 30 years handicapping markets the way my father taught me to handicap horses. Do the work. Ignore the crowd. Bet big only when the odds are mispriced. After applying that same framework to Bitcoin, I’ve come to a simple conclusion: This is the most asymmetric bet of my career. Not because of hype, because of positioning. The wealthiest allocators still treat it like a 100–1 longshot. My paper explains why I think they’re wrong. 👇 visserlabs.substack.com/p/ha…
129
360
63
2,845
242,549
CalBear73 retweeted
The institutional FOMO is real. We're watching banks and boardrooms across America scramble to figure out Bitcoin custody. Companies that laughed at the idea 2 years ago are now asking "how fast can we get this on our balance sheet?" Here's what I told Vince Quill on the “Decentralize” podcast with @Cointelegraph: → It's becoming irresponsible NOT to own @Bitcoin →Any corporate treasury department that doesn’t own Bitcoin is risking accelerating losses to the inflationary dollar. →Any family that doesn’t own at least 6 months of Bitcoin runs the risk of being in the back of the line when there is a run on the (fiat) banks. →Even governments that don’t put Bitcoin into their treasuries run the risk of becoming marginalized by their own overspending. → The dollar vs Bitcoin dynamic is reaching a tipping point We covered everything from El Salvador's strategy to why @MicroStrategy got it right early, and what this means for the next wave of adoption. My prediction stands: $250K @Bitcoin by the end of 2025. The fundamentals are stronger than ever. Listen wherever you get your podcasts.
66
131
28
806
107,157
🟢Howard Lutnick: “I want to make the USA $2 trillion, I own $1 Billion of MSTR, $200 million of Bitcoin (that will become billions), and I have authority from the president of the United States to buy Bitcoin in ‘budget neutral fashion’ after we sold $5 billion of gold cards and DOGE (my idea to Elon) is gonna cut $1 trillion from the deficit.” 🟠Step 1: cut $1 trillion 🟠Step 2: sell $100s of billions of gold 🟠Step 3: buy $300 billion of Bitcoin 🟠Step 4: force Bitcoin price up 10x 🟠Step 5: get Tump’s successors elected after bragging we made the USA literally trillions in Bitcoin during our administration Howard Lutnick has a growing probability of being the single biggest NGU contributor in Bitcoin’s history… and it seems like he wants to. You’d have to be a complete idiot to have zero exposure to Bitcoin over the next 4 years. The direction couldn’t be more clear. Pump it, Howard.🚀
277
853
94
6,932
709,025