
Author of A Month with Starfish, Founding member of GLF. Co-founder of @AllianceLGB. Views expressed are my own.
Joined October 2012
- Tweets33.4K
- Following1.9K
- Followers46.4K
- Likes29.3K
Bev Jackson retweeted

Fiona Graph@fiona_graphOct 18
United Kingdom
United KingdomConnected via United Kingdom Android AppAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
At #BattleFest we discussed the forced marriage of LGB and TQI+ which Bev Jackson @BevJacksonAuth, co-founder of @AllianceLGB, described as equivalent to a union of vegans and chicken farmers. We all agreed we all want a divorce and to reclaim our history
Bev Jackson retweeted
Statement from the European Network of Migrant Women — who represent many women who have fled religiously repressive cultures — about the recent European Parliament resolution on combatting Muslim Brotherhood infiltration in Europe.
I recommend you read it, it’s like balm for the soul. All the left-wing organisations and political parties in Brussels voted AGAINST the bill because they didn’t want to be accused of “Islamophobia”.
We are so lucky to still have organisations like this that care about the welfare of women, above anything else. Absolute heroines. This is principle, not political expediency. This is courage. Shoutout to @ENoMW
Bev Jackson retweeted
Het is echt heel gevaarlijk dat dit in Nederland wordt toegestaan. Ik heb als journalist veel met #Hamas in #Gaza te maken gehad. Het is met afstand de meest vrouwonvriendelijke, homo- en jodenhatende ANTI-Palestijnse beweging die ik ken. Hoe kan je dit nu steunen?
Bev Jackson retweeted
It's horrifying that these people don't have the grace to think about stepping back on the third anniversary of a massacre. I'd have hoped that even the most ardent pro-pal campaigners would've had the humanity to recognise the cruelty of this. Let people grieve fgs.
Bev Jackson retweeted
Three years ago today, there was no war raging in Gaza. There was a ceasefire.
Then, in the early hours of 7 Oct, Hamas launched a coordinated invasion of Israel. Thousands of armed men crossed the border & they deliberately went looking for civilians.
They went into homes & murdered families. They killed children & elderly. They abducted men, women & children & dragged them back into Gaza as hostages where civilians cheered.
And they attacked the Nova music festival. Hundreds of young people were dancing in the desert when terrorists descended on them. It is grimly familiar to see Islamist terrorists choosing a place of music, dancing, & freedom as a killing ground. Manchester. The Bataclan. Nova.
There are photographs & videos of what happened that day because, extraordinarily, many of the perpetrators filmed it themselves.
There is a plethora of evidence of sexual violence. There is the intercepted call in which a Hamas attacker excitedly told his parents that he had killed 10 Jews “with my own hands”. They raped & burned bodies, hunted people through fields & into bomb shelters, & paraded terrified hostages through Gaza.
It was an atrocity.
And something happened in the West almost immediately afterwards that I still struggle to comprehend.
Before Israel had even buried its dead, people thousands of kilometres away began finding reasons why the victims had it coming.
Within days, the murderer and the murdered had begun swapping places in the popular imagination.
Three years later, antisemitism has returned with a fervour to Western society with a speed and confidence that should terrify us.
Ancient conspiracies about Jewish power & blood libels have been repackaged in the vocabulary of “decolonisation”. Jewish people around the world have been expected to account for the actions of a foreign government. People have celebrated or rationalised terrorism as “resistance”. Influencers who could not have found Gaza on a map 4 years ago have turned Palestine into an entire political identity.
And an extraordinary amount of propaganda has been swallowed without the slightest curiosity about the people producing it.
So, since the word itself is now treated as an obscenity I will admit that I am a Zionist.
Zionism, at its most basic, is the belief that the Jewish people have a right to national self-determination in their historic homeland & that Israel has a right to continue to exist as a Jewish state.
That does not mean believing the Israeli government is always right. It does not mean supporting every military action, every politician, or every policy. It does not mean believing Palestinian civilians have no rights or that their suffering does not matter.
It means I believe Israel should exist. Shouldnt be eradicated.
If Israel’s objective were simply to obliterate Gaza without regard for civilian life, it possesses the firepower to inflict destruction on a vastly greater scale. But they don’t.
Hamas, meanwhile, has repeatedly made clear that it regards the destruction of Israel (not peaceful coexistence with it). They have turned down peace deals & 2 state solutions.
You can grieve for innocent Palestinians. I do. And you can criticise Israel. I do.
You can also believe that every innocent life lost in this war is a tragedy.
But I will not pretend that Hamas is a liberation movement. I will not romanticise men who deliberately massacred & raped civilians. I will not accept that murdering Jews is morally complicated because the murderers have run a highly successful propaganda campaign.
And I will not participate in the extraordinary collective amnesia about how this war began.
On 7 Oct 2023, people were dancing. Then Hamas came across the border to kill them.
I remember them today.
Bev Jackson retweeted
A Statement of Conscience on October 7
I will not start by saying ‘as a Muslim’ or ‘as an imam’, but as a human being.
On October 7, over 1,200 innocent people were killed in a single day. Families were shot in their homes. Young people out dancing were hunted across open fields. Over 250 people, including children and the elderly, were dragged into Gaza as hostages. I think of a mother hiding in a safe room with her baby’s mouth covered. I think of a father listening as the line went quiet. I think of families who waited month after month for someone to come home, only to receive a coffin. I didn’t need my faith to recognize the evil of what happened. My heart told me first.
But I’m a Muslim and an imam, and I owe the world one honest sentence: what was done that day was a crime against God. God teaches that whoever kills one innocent soul, it is as if he had killed all humanity.
This day has an author: Yahya Sinwar. He planned it, ordered it, and knew what would follow. Every death of that day and war he started rests on him and Hamas leaders who sat in tunnels and foreign hotels and called slaughter a victory. It rests on every Palestinian leader who cheered, excused, handed out sweets, or said nothing. They chose this. They own it.
But Sinwar did not invent himself. He was the fruit of a tree planted almost a century ago by the Muslim Brotherhood. Hamas named itself in its founding charter as the Brotherhood’s branch in Palestine. The Brotherhood’s poison is slow. It arrives through study circles, youth camps, charity boxes, and kind words to lonely young men. Drop by drop, it teaches him that his religion is a political party, his neighbour is his enemy, the Jew is the cause of his sorrow, and God is pleased by rage. By the time the gun arrives, the soul is already taken.
I have seen this poison in mosques where sermons became rallies and young men could recite slogans but not sit still for a verse on mercy. Every people that let the Brotherhood in has paid in blood and ruined generations. It has never built anything it did not first set on fire.
Behind Hamas stands another hand: the IRGC. It was the IRGC’s money, weapons, and training that turned a hateful idea into an army. One calls itself Sunni and the other Shia, and they may curse each other’s creeds, but they are united in what they worship. It is not God. It is power. The same IRGC that armed the killers of October 7 shoots Iranian girls for showing their hair, hangs young men for asking to be free, and has left graves from Tehran to Damascus to Beirut. They speak in God’s name. So did Pharaoh speak in the name of heaven.
So let me say this clearly. Hamas and the IRGC are not merely enemies of Islam. That would be too small a charge, as if their crime were only against us. They are enemies of God. God is the Giver of life, yet they deal in death. God calls Himself the Most Merciful, yet they have made cruelty a sacrament. God honoured the children of Adam, yet they look at a child and see a target or a shield. To murder what God created and sign His name to it is the oldest blasphemy.
And we Muslims have been too quiet. Some of us were afraid. Some told ourselves it was not our business. Some, God forgive them, felt something other than horror that morning and never confessed it. Silence was the soil this poison grew in. I will not add to it.
So on this anniversary, let us say plainly what our scripture already says. The Jews are not our enemies. They are our cousins in Abraham, and their dead were created by the same God who created us. Today belongs to them: the murdered, the hostages, and families who still set a place at the table. To them I say: I am sorry for what was done to you by men who used the words of my prayers. You’re not alone in your grief or remembrance.
The enemies of God are those who murder in His name. We know their names. It is time we said them from our own pulpits, in our own voices, before they speak for us again.
Imam Tawhidi
Bev Jackson retweeted
We have sent this letter to the Head of the RCN with the winning badge entry.
We are sure we'll see it in the RCN shop before Christmas...
Bev Jackson retweeted
This morning our Chairman @Mullers1993 went and spoke to the @AllianceLGB and @KateBMwriting about how we can work pragmatically together. 🏳️🌈💙🇬🇧
Bev Jackson retweeted
Excellent event from @AllianceLGB at Tory Conference. Vulnerable gay kids who have been persuaded they’re ‘trans’ will suffer the most from Labour’s Conversion Therapy Bill.
Bev Jackson retweeted
At the World Congress of Psychiatry 2026
An expert said to a room full of psychiatrists:
Do not refer kids to gender clinics
Refer them to any child psyciatrist
The room of people clapped.
Bev Jackson retweeted
“It makes looking after gay children a crime...this bill causes — and not prevents — gay conversion therapy”, says Dennis Kavanagh.
The Bill is both confusing and confused. It is framed as protecting vulnerable people from coercive attempts to change their sexual orientation or gender identity. In reality, it risks criminalising well-intentioned conversations and imprisoning parents, teachers, therapists, religious communities and even friends.
Speaking at the Free Speech Union and Genspect’s event in Belfast on Friday, criminal barrister and co-director of the Gay Men’s Network Dennis Kavanagh highlighted that the law already rightly bans abusive conversion practices.
This Bill would create new offences that could criminalise important conversations between parents and their gender-confused children.
It will inevitably and inadvertently harm the very children it purports to protect by casting “the shadow of criminal law across your kitchen table”.
Watch Dennis and the full event below 👇
Bev Jackson retweeted
It comes down to this.
To even have a HOPE of pretending your motion isn’t antisemitic, you accept this amendment. Obviously.
It was instead rejected twice. First in a pre-conference meeting on amendments, then by party members in the hall.
This is now what the Green Party is.
Bev Jackson retweeted
The Greens have told “any observant Jews in the world, let alone just in Britain, that they are a racist”, says Times Radio presenter @HugoRifkind.
“That means if you believe in a two-state solution, you’re racist.”
Bev Jackson retweeted
The Green Party’s decision to pass a motion treating Zionism as a form of racism is the latest manifestation of a much bigger and more disturbing trend in modern politics.
I increasingly think social media has done something profound to the way human beings form political beliefs.
Algorithms don’t simply give us access to more information. They learn what engages us and then repeatedly feed us variations of it. We click on something because it confirms a suspicion, and the machine gives us more. Then more again.
Over time, beliefs that once seemed extreme can begin to feel completely normal.
I’ve watched intelligent, liberal, reasonable people move from legitimate concern about Israel’s treatment of Palestinians to casually saying they wouldn’t care if Israel disappeared altogether because they now regard it as an inherently murderous or illegitimate state.
I think something similar has happened in the gender debate. People who once regarded women’s sex-based rights and safeguarding as fundamental now argue that those protections should give way to gender identity - while remaining convinced that they are simply becoming more compassionate.
That is the part that fascinates and worries me most.
People rarely experience ideological radicalisation as radicalisation. From inside their own heads, it feels like moral progress.
And social media is uniquely equipped to accelerate that process because the information reaching us is no longer primarily information we have consciously gone looking for. Increasingly, the machine chooses it for us - one post, video and outrage at a time.
Perhaps the biggest mistake governments make is imagining this is principally a problem affecting children.
Adults are susceptible too.
X, TikTok, Facebook, YouTube and the rest are conducting an unprecedented experiment on billions of human minds. None of us should assume we are immune simply because we consider ourselves intelligent, liberal, conservative, compassionate or well informed.
The most important political habit of the next decade may therefore be intellectual self-surveillance. Ask yourself:
Why do I believe this?
Did I always believe it?
What evidence would change my mind?
And is my worldview actually mine - or has an algorithm been quietly constructing it for me?
Because if we cannot answer those questions, polarisation is going to get much worse before it gets better.
Bev Jackson retweeted
So now we know, on the 80th anniversary of Cable Street, we have the Greens: the party for anti-semites and anti-women male predators.
Bleakly ironic. Good to know who the extremists,fascists and anti-science fools are, I suppose.
Bev Jackson retweeted
This billboard wasn’t allowed in public incase it offended anyone so please do not repost it. Thanks.
Bev Jackson retweeted
Currently attending a hearing in the European Parliament on funding for women’s organisations around the EU.
This is TERFy as hell.
Organised by @ENoMW @HungarianWomen, Swedish, French and Lithuanian women’s lobbies.
Bev Jackson retweeted
It was a pleasure to sponsor @AllianceLGB ‘s #ItsOKtoBeGay event in Parliament recently.
The Conversion Practices Bill sounds lovely, but in reality it is a Trojan Horse for “transing away the gay”. Almost all gay conversion practices are already illegal. If this bill goes ahead as currently drafted, it will do huge damage to the LGB community.
Parents and carers should be extremely worried about it. It seeks to criminalise them for preventing their gender-nonconforming child from embarking on irreversible medical pathways that could detrimentally impact their health, wellbeing, sexual function and fertility.
Up to 5 years in prison. For protecting your child.
Bev Jackson retweeted
Zo leuk dat een feministisch icoon als Jolande Withuis zich ook uitlaat over het advies van de Gezondheidsraad over transgenderzorg aan jongeren.
Ze legt de vinger op de zere plek: het is een politiek compromis, ten koste van de 'genderdysfore' kinderen.
"Het onderwerp transgender is zo overgepolitiseerd geraakt dat critici van de in Nederland dominante opvattingen worden bedreigd, geïntimideerd en uitgemaakt voor transhaters met bloed aan hun handen. Het eindadvies laat zien dat de commissie zich van deze polarisatie niet heeft weten te bevrijden.
Dat luidt namelijk dat er voor de huidige behandelwijze van genderdysfore kinderen weliswaar geen wetenschappelijk bewijs bestaat en dat we over wezenlijke kwesties (langetermijngevolgen van hormoongebruik; spijt) nog weinig weten, maar dat we er vooral mee moeten doorgaan. Dat lijkt een politiek compromis, nota bene over een medische behandeling met verregaande consequenties."
archive.vn/80dmZ#selection-1…

































