Красавчик, добряк,люблю капибар и людей
Украина
Joined July 2019
- Tweets236
- Following29
- Followers83
- Likes245
Solonsky retweeted
🏆 $500 GIVEAWAY WINNERS 🏆
It’s been another blessed month, so I decided to choose five winners this time.
Congratulations to @papago345xyz @UniqueSmau @ucmorgan01 @Orewalsaac @chinmuaya09.
We had thousands of entries, so we’ll be running another giveaway next week to pick a few more.
🤝
🏆 $500 COMMUNITY GIVEAWAY 🏆
Running it back with another $500 giveaway.
The previous giveaway post seems to have disappeared, so I’m restarting it and doubling the prize.
How to enter:
- Like + repost
- Drop your Solana address below
Must be following @ArdiNSC to qualify.
Winners picked in 7 days.
Good luck. 🤝
Solonsky retweeted
🏆 $500 COMMUNITY GIVEAWAY 🏆
Running it back with another $500 giveaway.
The previous giveaway post seems to have disappeared, so I’m restarting it and doubling the prize.
How to enter:
- Like + repost
- Drop your Solana address below
Must be following @ArdiNSC to qualify.
Winners picked in 7 days.
Good luck. 🤝
Solonsky retweeted
Hi @nikitabier
This is what being an original creator on @X looks like right now.
I genuinely don’t understand how this is fair.
My account has been permanently suspended from X’s Creator Revenue Sharing Program.
I’ve spent my time building my community around original chart analysis and educational content.
I have never promoted anything on X- paid or free.
Zero fraudulent activity.
Zero automated bots.
Zero engagement manipulation of any kind.
I’ve never engaged in fraudulent activity or tried to manipulate the platform.
Yet my monetization has been paused due to a policy violation, and I’m now also ineligible for the Original Content Rewards Program.
The only posts I can think of that may have triggered this were occasional GM/GN posts or “drop a ❤️ if you’re active” posts, simply trying to interact with my own community.
If that violated a policy, I’m completely willing to understand it and correct it.
But the problem is that I repeatedly asked for a genuine human review of my account and its full context.
Instead, I kept receiving automated responses.
I even tagged X/X Support several times publicly asking for a human review, but received no response.
An automated system may have flagged something, but without a human actually reviewing my account, my content history, and the context behind those posts, an AI/system decision has effectively been treated as the final truth.
And every time I’ve received this email saying, “After a thorough review, our team has determined…”
If an AI/system made the mistake, a human review should be able to correct it.
I’ve appealed multiple times.
I keep receiving automated replies.
I’ve requested a human review 3–4 times and even tagged X officially here, but I still haven’t received a single response.
I’m not asking for special treatment.
I’m asking for someone to actually look at my account.
Look at my content.
Look at my history.
Look at what I actually create.
If I genuinely violated a policy, I’m willing to accept the consequences. But please let a human review the case before an automated decision permanently defines my account.
Original creators deserve at least that much.
@X @XCreators @Support @grok
Can someone please give my case a genuine human review?
Solonsky retweeted
"Jack London drinking his life away while
writing of strange and heroic men.
Eugene O’Neill drinking himself oblivious
while writing his dark and poetic
works.
now our moderns
lecture at universities
in tie and suit,
the little boys soberly studious,
the little girls with glazed eyes
looking
up,
the lawns so green, the books so dull,
the life so dying of
thirst."
~ Charles Bukowski
Solonsky retweeted
“The world breaks every one… But those that will not break it kills. It kills the very good and the very gentle and the very brave impartially. If you are none of these you can be sure it will kill you too but there will be no special hurry.”
— Ernest Hemingway
Solonsky retweeted
$BTC
Halte dich fest, denn was du jetzt lesen wirst, wird dich umhauen...
Meiner Meinung nach besteht Max Pain aktuell weder darin, den BTC direkt auf 30-40k zu jagen, noch darin, das Ding jetzt einfach weiter hochzupumpen...
Ich prognostiziere, Stand 02.09.2026, Folgendes:
Im Q4 2026 werden wir ein letztes Hurra am Kryptomarkt erleben...
BTC wird auf 90-100k, möglicherweise sogar etwas darüber steigen...
Altcoins werden parabolische Anstiege erleben...
Zu diesem Zeitpunkt werden sich ALLE sicher sein, dass der größte Bullenmarkt aller Zeiten bevorsteht...
Es wird keine Debatten mehr darüber geben, ob wir uns möglicherweise noch in einem größeren Bärenmarkt befinden...
Menschen werden Haus und Hof verkaufen, um All-in zu gehen, da 200k/BTC binnen 2 Jahren so sicher scheinen wird, wie das Amen in der Kirche...
Der Retail wird blind vor Gier ALLES kaufen, was Mr. Big Money ihm anzubieten hat...
Währenddessen wird sich die Elite ins Fäustchen lachen, dass die Masse so blöd ist, ihnen BTC NOCHMAL für 100k abzukaufen...
Viele wundern sich aktuell, weshalb sich das Sentiment noch nicht wie zu den vorhergehenden Bärenmarkt-Böden angefühlt hat...
Wartet ab, was hier los ist, wenn der GARANTIERTE Bullenmarkt nicht stattfindet und BTC stattdessen von 100k wieder auf die 30k zurennt...
Dann werdet ihr erleben, was Angst bedeutet...
Dann werdet ihr die Verzweiflung der Masse spüren können...
Dann wird Mr. Big Money akkumulieren.
#Krypto #BTC
Solonsky retweeted
🚨 ON VOUS MENT SUR LES MEMECOINS !
Voici les résultats de près de 467 500 traders sur @fomo au cours des 90 derniers jours :
→ 94,3% ont PERDU de l’argent
→ Seulement 5,7% sont en positif
Mais le plus fou :
Seulement 33 traders ont gagné + de 10 000$.
Pendant ce temps, + de 18 600 traders ont perdu + de 10 000$.
Soit environ :
1 trader qui gagne +10k$
pour
565 traders qui perdent +10k$ 💀
Et si votre objectif est simplement de gagner +1 000$ ?
Vous devez faire partie du TOP 0,14%.
Sur Twitter, vous voyez constamment les screenshots des gagnants, les x10, les PNL à 6 chiffres et les « easy money ».
Vous ne voyez quasiment jamais les centaines de milliers de personnes qui sont dans le rouge.
Les réseaux montrent les gagnants.
Les statistiques montrent la réalité.
Solonsky retweeted
Retail buying peaked at the top of the $ZEC rally.
And then got completely shaken out on the first pullback.
Meanwhile, mid-sized and institutional-sized buying continued through the pullback, and hit their peak as retail was exiting.
That's generally how it works.
Retail waits for price to feel safe, buys after the move, then panics at the first sign of discomfort.
Smart capital accumulates gradually without needing a single candle to validate its position.
They say AI agents trade better than human traders because they have no emotions, don’t take breaks for food or sleep, think purely logically, hold the entire historical range of prices and moves in memory, and scan every news item and official statement 24/7 for patterns that historically moved markets.
Then this happened. Whether deliberately or by accident, the carefully chosen words of Fed Chair Kevin Warsh tricked the AI agents that read the news and can fire off orders instantly.
In the first few minutes of his Jackson Hole speech, Warsh used the word “hike” three times while literally talking about hiking trails and trends — never mentioning rate hikes.
He also avoided the phrase “forward guidance,” instead describing the structure of his speech as a “trail map.”
Warsh seemed to deliberately end one sentence with the word “hike” and start the next thought with “interest rates.” That combination coincided exactly with gold and silver jumping almost 1%, after which $730 billion in combined market value vanished in minutes.
Some algorithms apparently misread the mentions of “hike” (mountain walks) as a signal of rate hikes, triggering automatic trades and treating a discussion of hiking trails as monetary-policy guidance.
People listening had no illusions about what the Fed Chair was saying. The AIs got fooled and wiped $730 billion off the market in seconds. No human watching could even have placed an order in time.
What other surprises is artificial intelligence preparing for us? What if neural nets are trusted with rapid response in the military domain — or even the authority to launch nuclear missiles?
AI will kill humanity soon enough, and we can’t even calculate exactly how.
One thing is already clear: living traders in any market — stocks or finance — are now just food for the army of AI agents.
Solonsky retweeted
“They wrote in the old days that it is sweet and fitting to die for ones country. But in modern war there is nothing sweet nor fitting in your dying. You will die like a dog for no good reason.”
— Ernest Hemingway
Solonsky retweeted
“The insult only works if you accept it.”
- Diogenes
Diogenes of Sinope was a Greek philosopher who lived in the 4th century BCE and became one of the most famous figures of the Cynic school of philosophy.
He rejected wealth, status, luxury, and conventional ideas of respectability. Ancient accounts describe him living with very few possessions and sleeping in a large ceramic storage vessel in Athens. Stories also portray him deliberately challenging powerful figures and dismissing insults to show how little he cared about public opinion. For Diogenes, true freedom came from needing as little as possible, including the approval of others.
The image is Jean-Léon Gérôme’s 1860 painting Diogenes. It depicts the famous story of Diogenes carrying a lamp in broad daylight while claiming to be searching for an honest man. Gérôme surrounded him with dogs, referencing the origin of the word “Cynic,” which comes from the Greek kynikos, meaning “dog-like,” and reflected the Cynics’ deliberately unconventional way of life.
Solonsky retweeted
Rome handed out free grain to 40,000 citizens in 73 BC. By 46 BC, Julius Caesar found 320,000 people lining up for their monthly ration. That eight-fold expansion happened in under three decades, and it shows you how welfare states actually grow.
No Roman senator stood up and announced a plan to addict a third of the city to government bread. It happened incrementally, through political competition. Each magistrate who wanted votes expanded eligibility. Each expansion normalized the next one. The citizen who once considered the dole shameful eventually expected it, then demanded it, then organized politically to protect it.
This is the core mechanism free market thinkers have identified across every era: once you create a transfer program, you create a constituency for that program. Recipients vote. Administrators build careers. Grain merchants who supply the state develop a stake in keeping the contracts flowing. The political economy locks in.
Caesar, to his credit, actually cut the rolls back to 150,000 through verification audits. It was one of his more economically coherent moves, though the Senate still murdered him. His successors quietly let the numbers climb again.
What did the dole require? Massive grain imports from Sicily, Sardinia, and Egypt, organized through state logistics at state expense, funded by taxation and conquest. When the conquest revenue dried up, the obligation remained. Rome had written a check against future military success, and future military success eventually failed to arrive.
The lesson is not complicated. Distribute a benefit and you distribute dependency. Distribute dependency and you distribute political power to whoever controls the distribution. The grain dole didn't weaken Rome overnight, but it made every subsequent reform politically impossible.
