
Co-founder and Co-CEO of @resonant_energy | distance over speed | (i/dec)
Boston, MA
Joined January 2011
- Tweets1.1K
- Following1.2K
- Followers249
- Likes8.5K
Ben Underwood retweeted
Replying to @MattZeitlin
Maybe in the way that climate change is deeply contested
I only made it like 50% of the way through this tweet, I think he’s really onto something
The new iOS update that offers summaries of unread text messages really hammers home how much of the internet these days is summaries and how being online builds the deep expectation that everything needs to be summarizable.
Way back in, say, 2021 AD, a person once had to read text messages, Google links to articles, read articles, read memos, etc. Now everything is a gist.
Ben Underwood retweeted
Turns out it's possible to generate videos that maximally excite an arbitrary brain region using a simple search-based algorithm. It's a fully computational approach, so it's another way to speculate what a brain region represents, alongside other neuroscientific methods.
Select an arbitrary brain region->algorithmically generate a video that jacks it up. See the visuals on the webpage nevo-project.epfl.ch/
In silico (for now)
Ben Underwood retweeted
As evidenced by the unbridled promotion and implementation of technology at the expense of human dignity, we are truly experiencing an eclipse of the sense of what it means to be human. It is imperative to recover an understanding of the true meaning and grandeur of humanity as intended by God. It is in this sense that the challenge we currently face is not technological, but anthropological, and it is my hope that the Encyclical Letter to be published within a few days will contribute to answering this challenge.
This may explain why @pmarca’s head just keeps getting bigger and bigger: Information goes in, but has no way to get out.
Great men of history had little to no introspection.
The personality that builds empires is not the same personality that sits around quietly questioning itself.
@pmarca and I discuss what we both noticed but no one talks about:
David: You don't have any levels of introspection?
Marc: Yes, zero. As little as possible.
David: Why?
Marc: Move forward. Go!
I found people who dwell in the past get stuck in the past. It's a real problem and it's a problem at work and it's a problem at home.
David: So I've read 400 biographies of history’s greatest entrepreneurs and someone asked me what the most surprising thing I’ve learned from this was [and I answered] they have little or zero introspection.
Sam Walton didn't wake up thinking about his internal self.
He just woke up and was like:
I like building Walmart. I'm going to keep building Walmart. I'm going to make more Walmarts. And he just kept doing it over and over again.
Marc: If you go back 400 years ago it never would've occurred to anybody to be introspective.
All of the modern conceptions around introspection and therapy, and all the things that kind of result from that are, a kind of a manufacture of the 1910s, 1920s.
Great men of history didn't sit around doing this stuff.
The individual runs and does all these things and builds things and builds empires and builds companies and builds technology.
And then this kind of this kind of guilt based whammy kind of showed up from Europe. A lot of it from Vienna in 1910, 1920s, Freud and all that entire movement. And kind of turned all that inward and basically said, okay, now we need to basically second guess the individual.
We need to criticize the individual.
The individual needs to self criticize.
The individual needs to feel guilt, needs to look backwards, needs to dwell in the past.
It never resonated with me.
Mass-produced LLM text is not a harmless drafting assistant.
It is flattening the topography of the internet.
It is smoothing every idiosyncrasy into median tone.
It is converting lived experience into statistically probable phrasing.
Can someone else confirm this for me, or am I finally losing it: Instagram automatically turns up the brightness of your phone screen when you scroll over an ad?
Ben Underwood retweeted
Imagine you own a paid-off heavy-duty pickup truck that gets 12 MPG. You decide to buy an e-bike for your daily commute.
The critic: "That's wasteful! Now you have to maintain two vehicles instead of one."
Reality: you keep the truck for heavy lifting (reliability), but use the bike for 90% of trips (cheap energy). Even with "two systems," your total costs drop because you stop burning ~$100/week in gas.
Which begs the question: How much higher would our bills be today if we had not avoided grid infrastructure upgrades by making EE and DER investments ten or twenty years ago?
Replying to @xiaowang1984
Of course the real world is more complicated in that if you spend in efficiency you also can defer future upgrades. The fairy may not be able to do much about costs already incurred but it can definitely reduce future investment
I invite you to pause and notice how ugly the interface of this and virtually every other website has become
8+ hours a day of looking at this stuff really weighs on the prefrontal cortex... the enshitification is real! @doctorow
Not the hero we need, but maybe the hero we deserve: "Garbarino fell asleep during the House vote but said he would have supported the bill despite being disappointed with its details."
eenews.net/articles/senate-r…
A defining feature of many conservatives’ psychology is a stunted imagination: they can’t imagine that a better world is possible. It’s interesting to watch the contortions they come up with to justify the world they can directly observe.

























