A while back I had a grant rejected that I thought was a pretty good fit.
My first reaction was to focus on where I thought the reviewer was wrong.
More useful question: what did I make too hard to understand?
“They didn’t get it” isn’t a very useful place to stop.
Building hardware comes with its own unique challenges and obstacles but it creates a more substantial mote than software.
Tutor Tracker is up to 34 signups.
Still early, but it’s been fun watching a very niche product slowly find its users.
Keeping it free, learning from real usage, and improving as we go.
tutortrackerapp.com
Meta's new VR glasses have me excited about where the industry is headed.
As headsets get smaller and more practical, the opportunities for gaming, training, and simulation keep growing.
Better headsets are great. Now we need better ways to move in VR.
Striving and failing removes doubt.
It lays out plainly where you need to improve and what you still need to learn.
But never starting means never getting that insight.
You learn a lot about what you are capable of by trying, Even when it doesn’t work.
A hardware MVP should be the worst possible version of the product that you can still stand behind and be willing to sell.



