โKeep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!โ cries she
With silent lips. โGive me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!โ
ICE allowed Bolsonaro to enter the US using a canceled passport. This is the rankest hypocrisy. It shows how ICE has been politicized. ICE is a morally bankrupt agency and all Americans should be horrified.
Source on passport info:
noticias.uol.com.br/politicaโฆ
How can anybody come to this platform without feeling like they have to post a community note on every other reply?
Twitter was a source of information.
X, sadly, is a source of disinformation.
Old news, but this place is now unusable.
3D Gaussian Splattingใฎๆฐใใ่ฆใๆนใไฝใใพใใใใใฎๅใ Inversphere.
2Dใฎใชใใซใใฉใใใใจ้ใใ็ฉบ้ใใจ็้ขๅ่ปขใใฆใใพใใใฌใฉใน็ใซๅ
ฅใใๅพๆฅใฎ่ฆใๆนใฏ็ใงใๅใๅใใใฎใซๅฏพใใฆใใใใฏ็ใฎไธญใธใๆใ่พผใใใฎใง360ๅบฆใฎๆฏ่ฒใ็ก้้ ใพใง็ซไฝใงๅ
ฅใฃใฆใใพใใ
#3DGS
Uh, wtf? Just 4 years of kids get seed money?#trumpaccounts #bs
"Birth Window: The $1,000 U.S. Treasury deposit is strictly for children born between January 1, 2025, and December 31, 2028. Children born outside this window cannot receive the government seed money."
Scheduled during exam week, Thursday evening, huh? #Canvas #Instructure
Behold the ancient channels of Mesopotamia, pulled from public radar data using linear algebra! Very cool data sci/humanities paper. Jungrack Kim is totally cracked (best possible sense). doi.org/10.3390/rs15061636
๐-istentialism Is a Humanism retweeted
This is the interview Donald Trump didnโt want you to see.
His FCC refused to air my interview with Stephen Colbert.
Trump is worried weโre about to flip Texas.
๐-istentialism Is a Humanism retweeted
The lifecycle of a pure math theorem:
- 1997: my PhD advisor asks me to work on one of his conjectures
- 2000: I solve the simplest case and dream of generalizing my approach
- 2003: after years of struggle, I come to the conclusion that my approach *cannot* generalize
- 2006: after reading a paper by Daan Krammer, I have a lighting bulb moment and realize that my approach works in full generality *up to equivalence of categories*... this enables me to solve my advisor's conjecture... I then use it as an ingredient in the proof of a much older and more famous conjecture (the "K(ฯ,1) conjecture for finite complex reflection groups")
- 2007: I submit my article for publication
- 2009: referee #1 gives up
- 2010: 2 more referees have now given up, complaining that the paper is too hard to read
- 2012: referee #4 is finally able to produce a report, the revision work starts
- 2014: the paper is accepted for publication
- 2015: the paper is published
- 2007-2025: because the older conjecture overshadows the lesser known conjecture by my advisor, and because my paper is too difficult, virtually no-one asks any question about the "lighting bulb" categorical idea at the core of the proof
- Jan 22, 2026: I received an inbound email from a mathematician from another hemisphere, inquiring about the categorical aspects
- Jan 26, 2026: I have my first ever videocall discussing the specifics of this core component of my proof
๐-istentialism Is a Humanism retweeted
BREAKING: A newly obtained recording from Dec. 7, 2020 exposes Trump pressuring Georgia House Speaker David Ralston to call a special legislative session to OVERTURN the election he lost.
Trump even coached him on the cover story, telling Ralston to claim itโs โfor transparencyโ and โto uncover fraud.โ Then the most damning line:
โWhoโs gonna stop you for that?โ
Ralstonโs reply says it all: โA federal judge, possibly.โ
This was a sitting president actively probing how to illegally nullify an election, and joking about whether the courts could stop him.
Anyone still pretending Jan. 6 was a spontaneous protest is lying to themselves.
๐-istentialism Is a Humanism retweeted
๐จBREAKING: Republicans IMMEDIATELY regret calling in Jack Smith to testify as he says on the record he has absolutely ZERO regrets and would even CHARGE TRUMP AGAIN if he could.
Then suggested if Trump didnโt want to be indicted, he shouldnโt have broken the law:
SMITH: โIf asked whether to prosecute a former President based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether the President was a Republican or Democrat.โ
He added: โThe decision to bring charges against President Trump was mine, but the basis for those charges RESTS ENTIRELY with President Trump and his actions, as alleged in the indictments returned by grand juries in two different districts.โ
Thatโs how itโs done!!
๐-istentialism Is a Humanism retweeted
Replying to @DHSgov
You released him without charges.
If he assaulted law enforcement you would have charged him. Period.
Youโre lying and we all know it.
Graduate school makes you feel like a newb forever. Oh you're at the 6000 level? Still just an introduction.













