The ignorance here is startling - so much academic work pointing out this is exactly what neoliberalism is!
We haven't had neoliberalism for decades. Instead we have a system where central banks suppress risk, governments rescue failure and taxpayers absorb losses.
Gains are privatised; risks are socailised.
This isn't capitalism; it's the opposite.
thetimes.com/comment/columni…
Has there ever been a technology where all the hype centres on things that sound like the worst kind of dystopian bs?
🇺🇸 Zuckerberg says that in 5 years you will have a personal AI that knows your life and does the work for you.
"Everyone is going to have an agent that really intimately understands your goals and everything around you and can help you get stuff done."
He means one assistant on money, health, the house, the calendar, running in the background all day.
Meta wants that agent sitting inside the apps people already live in, so it becomes the way you get through a normal day.
Writer: Lucas
Ben Anderson retweeted
Throw a milkshake at farage and Reform will claim its an assassination attempt. Assault a women with a weapon and reform response is
"Boo hoo"
The hypocrisy is wild.
I’ve just written something that begins with an almost identical scene from a Refirm conference a couple of years ago - chanting boring, laughing, whilst a mob assaults a protester. Incredibly dangerous!
A woman, physically assaulted by a baying mob of angry Reformorons while their cult leader @Nigel_Farage laughs on from the podium.
Please share, this is who Reform are.
Ben Anderson retweeted
I wrote this about Jason Arday and lying. Free to read for 48 hrs. patreon.com/judeinlondon/pos…
Ben Anderson retweeted
Really really nervous that we appear to be tearing up all guidance on reporting around suicide. One of most dangerous tropes we can promulgate is that death will allow people to repent and see error, allowing deceased to be reframed as heroic and set family free
Fascinating how someone can be so naive. Funny thing is he’s right about the tone of Reform. Used to be a mix of fun, optimism, anger. Now it’s just resentment fuelled anger and victimhood, which caps them at (a very solid) 25% ish and motivates tactical voting against them
The disabled are not some other group. They are or will be many of us and could be any of us. No one knows what life will hold. No one knows what support we’ll need. The othering happening is shameful cruelty that will cause death
Ben Anderson retweeted
With a broad smile, Jason Arday proudly holds a football trophy aloft as teammates enjoy cakes.
This moment of joy is how I will remember the ex-Cambridge University professor, who was found dead this week. He was just 41. A tribute to my friend Jason: mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/ja…
And he’s definitely read all the other social science books published in 2026 to make this claim; honestly what nonsense. Will be interesting to see how, if at all, this book engages with all the critical social science work on negative or bad feelings
unavailable
Ben Anderson retweeted
Bizarre. Anyways, here’s my review of this apparently “groundbreaking” book. That wasn’t my judgement—if anything, it comfortably lives in an eclipsed past and sees the world accordingly.
proteanmag.com/2026/03/26/hy…
Well deserved profile of one of the most creative political thinkers of a new generation of intellectuals: “Anton Jäger has been lauded for his exceptional ability to make sense of these strange political times – and he’s only 32.”: theguardian.com/politics/202…
1. Labour right are addicted to hostile briefing; 2. too much U.K. political journalism is basically repeating gossip
EXCLUSIVE: Keir Starmer’s allies accuse Andy Burnham of appointing a divisive cabinet designed to reward those who brought him down.
One says it immediately breaks Burnham’s pledge to be inclusive and run a broad church. Another says it’s dangerously hubristic and creates enemies who will come back to haunt him. A third says there is no policy justification for the top appointments.
Burnham’s allies insist the cabinet represents all factions and regions. But in a striking response some of Starmer’s allies are saying men have got the top jobs and that it cements a north-south divide.
While some see John Healey as a safer pick as chancellor than a left-winger, a Starmer ally says he’s been misunderstood and he’s actually the fiscally loosest possible choice because he wants a massive increase in defence spending.
There is a lot of negative briefing about Wes Streeting, an arch anti-Starmer plotter, over his lack of defence experience. Former soldier Dan Jarvis losing his job is particularly upsetting people.
Ed Miliband, another key plotter, as foreign secretary is causing a big reaction. Some are confused because he faces a very difficult task winning round the Trump administration that openly dislikes him. And it’s angering those who were appalled by his infamous decision to block action against Assad.
There are also early signs of discontent on the left over Shabana Mahmood’s reappointment as home secretary. Lots of Burnham supporters on the left abstained on the immigration bill last week assuming she would be moved. They will want her to water down her more hardline immigration policies.
Some on the left are also disappointed Miliband wasn’t made chancellor, saying Healey will want to focus spending on defence and is hardly a transformational pick otherwise.
bloomberg.com/news/newslette…
I’m sorry, absolutely not. Half time is for an ordinary fan getting to take a penalty, getting kind of abused whist they take it, and if they score celebrating like they’ve won the World Cup. And some birthday announcements. #worldcup #worldcupfinal
A contemporary cultural phenomenon - someone seemingly unironically saying
‘Brilliant!’ at AI generated content that just isn’t. Dissonant times.
Would have been funny of this debate had concluded ‘yes, yes it unequivocally can’. Bit of a surprise to start the series off
Tribune has a new podcast! Barnaby Raine hosts postscript, a series of conversations on the future of the left amid the slow death of Western civilisation.
Episode 1 sees Barnaby and @adam_tooze debate whether liberal politics can save us now.
Some public affect theory in The Conversation on the visceral reaction to Keir Starmer via our analysis in the Politics of Feeling @ConversationUK
theconversation.com/the-poli…
Funny to witness the media already doing the work of preemptive delegitimisation
If you’re voting in Makerfield consider the Peter Principle: people rise to their respective level of incompetence.
Burnham has been a good Mayor but that is the best he can do. And if he loses today he gets to keep that job.
Today’s leader in @CityAM
news.uk.cityam.com/story/243…
Fantastic piece on the weirdness and rage of post industrial places by @Will___lloyd
‘Britain is a country where it’s easier to imagine where the next pogrom will happen than how a new high-speed rail line will be built.’
MAKERFIELD DAYS by @Will___lloyd
A season of superlatives was dawning over Makerfield, a collection of peri-rural suburbs, former pit villages and towns spread beneath Wigan. The vote was seismic. Historic. Make-or-break. The chance of a lifetime. Andy Burnham had staked his political future and the future of the Labour Party on a single vote against Reform UK’s Robert Kenyon, a plumber and former army reservist, burdened by a digital fossil record of embarrassing remarks about women. Makerfield was a constituency that, like Wigan itself, like so many other places with largely white, Brexit-voting, working-class populations, was speeding to the right. Win or lose, mayor or prime minister, Burnham was being run close – terribly close, given he was the most popular Labour politician in the country up against a man who, as one union apparatchik put it to me acidly, was “only as good as the last podcast he listened to”.
The constituents of Makerfield – trying their best, frowning at their bills, staring at Facebook, feeling uneasy in blunt ways that were hard to articulate in front of journalists – had woken up one morning to find themselves the most psychoanalysed population in Europe. Greater claims began to be made as the race went on. Makerfield was not simply Makerfield. It was, a prominent pollster argued, all of Britain: “A snapshot of the country in miniature.” And what kind of country was that?
I knocked on doors for several weeks. I drank in dust-furred community clubs and backstreet pubs. I ate half a dozen meat pies. I tried to speak to the Afghans and Kurds who adorned Wigan town centre in the middle of the day. I bumped into a squad of absurdly young men canvassing for Restore in the poorest parts of Abram. I watched the crowds at the women’s rugby league in Orrell and spoke to formidable local dignitaries who had spent decades trying to keep the area’s head above water. Burnham and Kenyon didn’t really interest me. Makerfield would be forgotten in a few weeks' time. The circus, self-involved and self-serving, would move on. Yet the people here matter. What interested me was not the race, but what was happening in people’s heads in Bickershaw and Platt Bridge and Hindley – what was happening to all of us right now that meant you could meet people seized by apocalyptic fears of race war and depressed social democrats living on the same street.
I have been sent all over the country in the past two years, trying to take its temperature, check its symptoms, diagnose its ills. I found that it was becoming harder to speak about the surreal things I saw and heard in a straightforward way. Every reporter I knew who was not too blind to see what was going on was struggling in the same way. They suffered from the same queasy, plunging intimation about where we were heading. I was tired of writing and speaking about the country like it was a “normal” place full of happy “normal” communities and cheeky “normal” Brits. Nothing I saw or heard seemed “normal”. Everything was changing.
Britain is a country where it’s easier to imagine where the next pogrom will happen than how a new high-speed rail line will be built. And I am sick and tired of the six-figure salary newspaper columnists who deny the country is broken on X while masked men go door to door in grand old cities, looking for homes and people to burn. Were they daft? Did they think they were clever?
Illustration by The Red Dress























