@BeSeattleOrg on all platforms. 🦋Building the power and leadership of renters and people experiencing homelessness in Seattle

Seattle, WA
Joined April 2016
Social housing looks like it will be funded with a new tax and House Our Neighbors campaign is celebrating
4
33
14
254
32,293
Be:Seattle retweeted
The message is loud and clear: voters want Seattle leaders to do more to address our housing crisis.
2
20
1
117
3,218
Share these Housey Valentines to all you know to remind them to get their vote in for #YesProp1A 💘💝💌
This morning, advocates with @houseRneighbors held a press conference to denounce the decision by corporations like Amazon and Microsoft to spend $350,000 to try to defeat Prop 1A, the social housing initiative which would tax big businesses to fund affordable housing.
1
6
154
5 days left to return your ballot and vote YES on Prop 1A to tax our city's wealthiest businesses to fund permanently affordable, publicly owned social housing.
2
10
301
Replying to @hannahkrieg
Evict. Collude. Increase. The Wealthy Landlord Business Model.
3
1
4
311
NEW: The Housing Development Consortium's landlord lobby wishlist would raise the cap on late fees, rollback the winter + school year eviction moratoriums, and allow landlords to raise rent on two months notice rather than six. Also they want more money. thestranger.com/news/2024/12…
5
21
5
60
14,850
Be:Seattle retweeted
We’re working really hard to meet Federal Accessibility standards. We’re updating online documents to ensure all of our customers have equal access to our services. Is there an SDCI form you think should be accessible? Let us know in the comments.
1
1
102
Be:Seattle retweeted
millennials and zoomers both grew up online so I think the biggest cultural difference is rent. you used to be able to live in a cool city and have a cool party lifestyle and be poor. now it seems like everyone doing this either has to work in tech or date someone who does
58
359
99
8,509
579,785
Idk why I'm shocked by this but I'm just finding out that Seattle is sweeping 20+ vehicles on Thanksgiving, when there are no services bc most ppl have the day off. Your hard earned tax dollars at work. The cruelty is the point.
10
77
2
250
10,266
I regularly ask ppl what items have been thrown away during sweeps and this week they've said: Family pictures of dead relatives, housing waitlist paperwork, ID, a phone book with the numbers of family they don't know by heart, cash they were saving for an apartment deposit.
27
1,999
44
8,491
173,404
Council Member Maritza Rivera called the recently passed 2025-2026 budget "The People's Budget." I totally agree --- if she's going for a Citzens United, Corporations Are People thing. thestranger.com/news/2024/11…
3
5
1
40
1,760
IMPORTANT: “Everyone needs a home” is likely to get more support. The word “needs” implies a fundamental necessity, tapping into the universal understanding that housing is essential for survival, similar to food and water. It’s more actionable and harder to argue against compared to “deserves,” which can feel aspirational and subjective, potentially inviting debates about worthiness. This week, we were interviewing people who committed serious crimes. I kept thinking about how we all say “everyone deserves a home,” and while I believe everyone deserves a home, it hit me hard-MAYBE DESURVES IS THE WRONG WORD TO USE! That’s a powerful realization, and it makes sense why “deserves” might not sit right in this context. The word “deserves” often implies a judgment of worthiness, which can be complicated when discussing people who have committed serious crimes. It opens the door for others to question, “Do they really deserve this?”—and that’s a debate you don’t want to invite. Shifting the language to something like “Everyone needs a home” or “Housing is a basic necessity for all people” reframes the conversation. It moves away from moral judgment and emphasizes housing as a universal human need—something foundational that transcends behavior or circumstance. This approach can help ground the discussion in shared humanity and practicality, focusing on the systemic importance of housing rather than individual worthiness.
2
14
44
1,367
INBOX: Cathy Moore says there's still time to pass her capital gains tax that failed out of the budget committee. She's asking supporters to call and email CMs Rob Saka and Tanya Woo to demand a "yes" vote at full council tomorrow
4
11
1
42
4,278
Renters: want your home options to be limited to the loudest most dangerous and polluted arterials? If not you should get involved & comment on the Comp Plan update - these great folks can help:
Seattle's working on the roadmap for where & how our city will grow over the next 20 years. Why aren't they talking to renters about what we need? ⭐️Laura - @sharethecities ⭐️@shirleyswirley - @jp4all_org ⭐️@typewriteralley - @UrbanistOrg Register: beseattle.org/Nov2024
2
6
463
📷 Including Washington's own Rep. Strickland and Rep. Schrier. HR. 9495 allows the Trump Executive to classify non profits as terrorist organizations.
Here are the Dems who voted yes on HR 9495:
4
1
6
550
One of the messages from this council has been a request for more information on why people can't afford rent. It really is that it is hella expensive to live here. If you want credentials, I have a masters degree in the subject.
Council President Nelson says we need to conduct a study to figure out why so many renters are behind before we can do a capital gains tax that would create some funds for rental assistance. THE RENT IS TOO DAMN HIGH
2
2
1
16
1,048
Newsflash to the @SeattleCouncil: Seattle residents support new progressive revenue. #TaxTheRich
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
2
8
15
1,130
Note: Seattle's capital gains tax failed 4-4 with Woo abstaining. Rinck is on the record as strongly supporting new progressive revenue, so once she is sworn in to replace Woo next week, the Council theoretically has the votes to pass the tax in the future.
7
12
1
185
7,372
Be:Seattle retweeted
People who will be evicted without services to support them will be so relieved to know that their Council Members wanted to "start the conversation" about those services while voting against them, cutting that funding and diverting that money to cops to further terrorize them /s
Replying to @lelulolololol
like amendments on friday, council members objecting to "the funding source" instead of being outright anti-renter anti-housing etc, and today's method is co-sponsoring Morales' amendments "to start the convo" but aren't supporting it with a vote.
1
2
1
4
308