Pinned Tweet
Replying to @greg_price11
Baxter retweeted
In June & July 2025 Israel was accused of killing "aid seekers" while the IDF said Hamas operatives dressed as civilians were attacking to disrupt GHF aid efforts. Now the truth is coming out: dozens of these fake "aid seekers" were combatants, like Abdul Rahman Abu Suwayreh.
If Palestinians are the real Jews, how come they don't practice the Jewish religion, speak the Hebrew language, Using the Jewish symbols or call themselves Jews, Hebrews or Israelis?
Baxter retweeted
Ich hätte nie gedacht, dass ich so etwas einmal öffentlich äußere.
Ich kann gerade nicht mehr.
Ich reiße mich sehr zusammen, dies zu schreiben.
Eine Kommission zur Untersuchung des Massakers vom 07. Oktober 2023 im Hinblick auf den sexualisierten Terror – auch an den Geiseln – hat ihren Bericht veröffentlicht.
In einigen Kommentaren hatte ich schon dazu gelesen. Die meisten von ehemaligen Soldaten, die im OSINT- oder akademischen Bereich in der Richtung öffentlich auftreten. Alle waren erschüttert, selbst Soldaten, die „in der Scheiße“ waren.
Mein Wille war – und ist es noch – zumindest einen kurzen Überblick über das 300-seitige Dokument zu geben, für das über 10.000 Fotos und Video-Segmente und 1800 Stunden Videomaterial ausgewertet wurden. Welches die Palästinenser zumeist selber veröffentlicht haben.
Und das ist auch nicht irgendwie halt eine jüdische Kommission und Hasbara. Sie ist eine Non-Profit-Organisation und wird unterstützt durch die deutsche Botschaft Tel Aviv, Kanada, Microsoft, usw. Mit dabei sind u.a. eine französische Botschafterin für Menschenrechte, ein Professor und Gründer des UN-Gerichts für Sierra Leone, ein ehemaliger Kommissar für Menschenrechte der UN, ein ehemaliger Stabschef des Weißen Hauses, und und und.
Ich wollte zumindest erklären, was dieser Bericht ist, von wem er kommt und einige Zeugenaussagen zitieren. Denn, so grauenvoll wie das ist, halte ich es für meine und unsere Pflicht, sich dem auszusetzen.
Wenn wir nicht in der Lage sind das zu ertragen, wie können wir dann erhobenen Hauptes von den Opfern erwarten, dass sie es erdulden und sich fügen? Ohne ihnen das allzu menschliche zuzugestehen womöglich?
Die Opfer waren nicht nur Juden. Es waren auch Thailänder, Amerikaner, Argentinier, Franzosen, Briten… Und die Deutschen haben es in einer sozialpsychologisch bemerkenswerten Leistung vermocht zu verdrängen, dass auch 22 Deutsche getötet und 17 als Geiseln genommen wurden.
Es geht nicht alleine darum, diese Unmenschlichkeiten zu lesen. (Fotos sind nicht drin, ich kenne eh viele.) „Unmenschlichkeiten“ ist ein absolut treffendes Wort, dass jedoch durch zu häufigen Gebrauch seinen tatsächlichen Inhalt verloren hat.
Das kann ich ab. Ich bin MilBlogger, ich habe viele Stunden Videos erduldet, in denen Menschen von Drohnen getroffen, erschossen und von Minen zerrissen wurden. Und ich habe sehr viele Videos und Bilder des 10/7 gesehen. Mehr als jedem Menschen eigentlich lieb sein sollte.
Es geht darum, nicht in zu lange den Abgrund zu blicken, weil der Abgrund sonst in dich blickt.
Auch vorher schon habe ich öffentlich deutlich gemacht, dass ich keinerlei Empathie mehr für die Palästinenser empfinde. Oder nicht darüber nachdenke, wie sehr sie sich auf das eh nutzlose Völkerrecht berufen.
Denn mein Gedanke ist eigentlich sehr leicht, auch wenn er für viele schwer zu erfassen scheint:
Wir Europäer haben unsere Werte, auf denen das Völkerrecht unbestreitbar basiert, in langen Kriegen untereinander erstritten und mit Churchills Blut, Schweiß und Tränen teuer erkauft. Nicht so sehr basierend auf den christlichen Glauben – dessen Teil ich gar nicht abstreiten will – sondern auf die griechische Philosophie und die Aufklärung.
Es ist aber nur schwer nachvollziehbar, warum wir diese Werte auch auf diejenigen anwenden, sie sogar auf sie projizieren und ihnen die gleichen Werte unterstellen, die so offensichtlich einen Scheiß auf sie geben.
Nach nur wenigen Stunden der Arbeit an diesem Bericht kämpfe ich mit Dämonen.
Ich möchte auch weiterhin für eine Zweistaatenlösung sein können. Ich möchte auch weiterhin nicht von der passiven Empathielosigkeit in offene Aggression verfallen. Ich möchte auch weiterhin nicht den Hass als einfachste Lösung bevorzugen. Ich will nicht alles auf den Islam projizieren.
Doch mit jeder Seite, mit jeder Zeugenaussage und mit jedem Bericht eines Helfers, in der nüchternen, fast wissenschaftlichen Zusammenfassung und Forensik, fällt es zunehmend schwer. So unglaublich schwer, dass ich mich dabei erwischt habe, alleine im Büro laut Debatten zu führen. (Normalerweise eine gute Schreib-Technik um Argumentationen zu üben.)
In unserem europäischen Hirn sortieren wir die Hamas gerne als Terrororganisation ein, die losgelöst von der palästinensischen Bevölkerung agiert. Dieses Bild beginnt zu bröckeln in dem Moment, in dem wir uns klar machen müssen, dass mindestens die Gaza-Palästinenser sich ja in dieser Gesellschaft eingerichtet haben. In der sie mit Cousins verheiratet werden, ihren Kindern in UNRWA-Schulen der Hass auf Juden beigebracht wird und jeder Angestellte eines Krankenhauses oder einer Uni die Hamas als Arbeitgeber auf der Lohnabrechnung hat. Das geht weit über Nazi-Mitläufer hinaus.
Wie lange kann jemand in einem solchen System tatsächlich unschuldig sein?
Und mehr noch: Wie muss eine Gesellschaft gestrickt sein, in der es als Machtdemonstration gilt, wenn junge Männer im Kreis um eine Geisel stehen, ihre sexuelle Frustration und soziale Inkompetenz kompensieren und sie reihum vergewaltigen? Selbst wenn sie tot ist, noch den rotten Pimmel unter dem Gelächter der Umstehenden in die Rotze des Vorgängers stecken?
Wenn diese Formulierung Ihnen zu hart war, sind Sie nicht ansatzweise bereit für die Realitäten. Damit müssen Sie klarkommen, nicht ich. Sich bei mir über die Formulierungen zu beklagen ist das deutlichste Zeichen dafür, sich den Realitäten nicht stellen zu wollen.
„Die Männer zerrten eine Frau aus dem Fahrzeug... entfernten gewaltsam die Kleidung und vergewaltigten sie... Sie stachen wiederholt auf sie ein und töteten sie... und vergewaltigten sie weiter, nachdem sie tot war.“
Raz Cohen, Überlebender des Nova Festivals
Wir können ja noch nicht einmal deutlich darüber debattieren. Weil unsere Regularien und unser sozialer Konsens es unterbinden auszusprechen, was die Realität ist. Ich kann noch nicht einmal Fotos posten, weil ich befürchten muss, dass die Social Media Plattformen mich dafür blockieren. Ich kann teilweise nicht einmal Links zu Fotos anderer Plattformen posten.
Wir bekommen eine heile Welt aufgezwungen, während um die Ecke das passiert, was wir als „unmenschlich“ aus unserer Welt entfernen wollen. Und leisten damit denen Bärendienste, die diese Realität verschwinden lassen wollen, während sie sie vorher noch stolz veröffentlicht haben.
Mir braucht keiner mehr mit Völkerrecht und Empathie gegenüber den Palästinensern kommen. Ich erlaube mir den menschlichen Reflex zumindest soweit.
Aber ich will nicht in diesen Abgrund. Und das ist anstrengend. Ich hatte Wuttränen.
Und ich musste mir Luft machen.
Der Artikel wird kommen.
Ich habe nicht das Recht wegzusehen.
Aber jetzt gerade kann ich einfach nicht mehr.
youtu.be/2p3rtnQ_7y4?si=z8D1…
Anmerkung: In den Datenbanken mit Pressebildern gibt es nur sehr wenige Bilder des 10/7 aus Israel, da dort Persönlichkeitsrechte und Opferschutz geachtet werden. Weshalb ich auch für die meisten auf Social Media gesperrt würde. Aber dafür sehr viele aus dem Gazastreifen, schon am ersten Tag.
Aus meinem Archiv…
Foto 1: Getötete Zivilisten auf der Straße nach Sderot
Foto 2: Israelische Truppen versuchen Sderot wieder unter Kontrolle zu bringen
Foto 3: Palästinenser überqueren zum Morden und Vergewaltigen die eingerissene Grenze nach Israel
Baxter retweeted
Contrary to Thomas's claim. Nearly every aspect of this coin is "borrowed" from Europeans.
Thomas claims that: “Muslims didn’t borrow the name. They didn’t adopt it later under European influence.”
Well, let’s break it down one by one.
First, this coin is from the 7th century CE - meaning it comes AFTER The Romans Renamed Provincia Iudeae to Provincia Syria-Palaestina in the 2nd century CE.
If you’re trying to argue that “Muslims didn’t borrow the name”, you’ll need to show Islamic mention of “Filastin” BEFORE the 2nd century CE, not after it.
(Bringing up Herodotus in this point isn’t relevant as he wasn't muslim, didn’t represent a sovereign entity, and referred only to the coastal strip known biblically as Pleshet).
Secondly, this coin (like many Umayyad coins) demonstrates perfectly how they borrowed names from the Byzantines.
The Arabic Name of the coin “fals”, was derived from the latin term “Follis” used for Byzantine coins of 40 Nummi.
The big M (Mu), represents the Number 40 in Greek Numerals.
The name “Aylah” was derived from the Latin name “Aila” originating in the Hebrew “Eilat” mentioned in the bible. (BTW the modern name Aqaba is short for aqabat ʿAylah - 'the mountain-pass of Ayla')
And of course “Filatin”, derived from the former Byzantine provinces of Palaestina, named after the previous Roman province of Syria-Palaestina, which was derived from “Pleshet” - a term mentioned in Hebrew and Egyptian sources to originally describe a small coastal area - but in the 2nd century was imposed by the Romans to replace Provincia Iudaea.
So yeah, every aspect of this coin proves how it was borrowed from European Latin and Greek Terminology.
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
Baxter retweeted
The IDF officers showed my family a video in which they see a three-year-old Gazan boy participating in a lynching that my father went through. The boys father tells him to kick, and he kicks. I can't describe that feeling to you, the frustration, the helplessness. That's why it's hard for me to accept the concept of 'not involved. Yagil Yaakov , the late Yaya (Yaakov’s ) son shared .
In June 2025, Yair (Yaya) Yaakov, 59, was laid to rest in the cemetery at Kibbutz Nir Oz. His body was returned to Israel from Khan Yunis in a joint operation by the IDF and Shin Bet. Yaya was kidnapped from his home in Nir Oz alongside his partner, Meirav, who was released from Gaza after 53 days.
For 52 difficult days and terrifying nights, Yagil Yaakov , Yaya Yaakov’s son was held captive - completely alone. He was 12 and a half years old when he was kidnapped from the military police station in Kibbutz Nir Oz, without his mother, father, or brother by his side. While families, siblings, and neighbors were held together, Yagil moved alone between buildings in Gaza, surrounded by armed terrorists, far from anything familiar and safe. Almost two and a half years later, when he is already a grown boy, he shares for the first time what captivity looks like through the eyes of a child: the hunger, the fear, the intense longing and the suicidal thoughts .
"In Gaza, I learned to get used to hunger, to understand that this is it, there is no food. The longing is as strong as I didn't think you could feel, as if your heart is being ripped out. You run your whole life before me, and what the hell did I do to deserve this situation," says Yagil. "And on the other hand - I was saved, and that's not easy either. Why am I and others aren't?".
״They took me to the house of someone who said he built houses in Nir Yitzhak. I thought they would lynch me and kill me. I went through four places, the crossings are difficult and scary and everywhere it was worse. I also slept overnight in a car in a refugee camp, with five terrorists. They scared me, but I was no longer afraid of dying, I was not afraid of the possibility of being killed."
"In the second house, I was held with a terrorist from whom I had to get permission to look out the window, which was on the balcony at the end of the hallway. One morning I woke up, he was sleeping, so I went to the window. I didn't hear him wake up, and when I came back, he was waiting for me with a board. He grabbed me, threw me on the couch, beat me. I was shirtless, I remember the beatings and the marks on my back a long time later. It was a difficult day, even on that day I thought about how to commit suicide. If there was someone else with me, I would have shared, but I was always alone, and that was the hardest thing. I wanted to tell the story, and for someone else to know about it and be a part of it. It was discouraging, I thought I would stay there for years, that's what they told me. They tried to play with my mind.
r/t הגר כוכבי
Photo credit and rights : Ziv Koren
Baxter retweeted
The Kapshitter family were heading home from 5 yo Ethan’s birthday camping trip when they were intercepted by Hamas and forced out of their car.
Hamas executed Ethan first, making sure the parents witnessed their son’s murder. Parents Dina and Evgeny were executed next to Ethan.
It took a week to find 8 yo Aline’s body. She was dragged away from the family and brutalized so horrifically she could only be identified via DNA.
Baxter retweeted
I write as a current professor of international law & retired US Army judge advocate with experience advising commanders in combat.
1) It doesn't matter that @gbsumudflotilla is (now, was) on the High Seas & not in @Israel's 12 mile territorial sea. Vessels are subject to capture outside neutral waters if they are breaching or attempting to breach a blockade. Source: San Remo Manual (SRM) ¶ 146 (pic 1, yellow highlight).
2) Maritime security measures conducted during peacetime are beyond the scope of SRM since the manual addresses international law applicable to armed conflicts at sea. So, it doesn't matter how long @Israel has enforced a naval blockade. The current armed conflict was initiated by #Hamas on October 7, 2023 - and rules reflected in the San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea have applied since then. Additionally, @CIJ_ICJ does not have unilateral authority to establish int'l law - whether through advisory opinions or otherwise. Therefore it doesn't matter what ICJ "found illegal" in advisory opinions.
3) There is no provision in SRM requiring a blockade to be a "short term measure." By definition, blockades can be enforced for the duration of the armed conflict - no matter how long the armed conflict may last. Source: SRM ¶¶ 93-94 (pic 2).
4) In any event, SRM rules DO NOT "explicitly state that humanitarian supplies may not be blockaded." There are rules addressing that conduct, but these rules are subject to other conditions & restrictions. As such, there is no outright ban on blockading "humanitarian supplies." Source: SRM ¶¶ 102-04 (pic 3).
5) It doesn't matter what the "UN Commission of Inquiry has already determined." Like ICJ advisory opinions, no UN CoI has unilateral authority to establish int'l law. Substantive merits of this report are beyond the scope of this post, but for a brief discussion see @Aizenberg55's observations here (xitter.cf/Aizenberg55/status/196…) & here (xitter.cf/Aizenberg55/status/196…). The claim that the "blockade is plainly a part of the machinery of such genocide" is just as anecdotal & authoritative as the UN CoI report Craig Murray cites here for support.
For reasons 1 to 5 nothing in Craig Murray's post constitutes a legitimate articulation or analysis of int'l law.
Then, as one might imagine, the remaining "so what" points unravel from there.
6) Attack on a vessel attempting to breach a naval blockade is just an attack on that vessel - not "on the flag state of the vessel attacked."
7) Detaining a vessel & its crew for breaching or attempting to breach a blockade is not an act "of illegal possession of vessels or abduction of crew on the High Seas." For neutral vessels breaching or attempting to breach a blockade, capturing the vessel is exercised by taking such vessel as prize for adjudication. Source: SRM ¶ 146 (back to pic 1, blue highlight).
8) So Metropolitan Police and DPP have NO obligation to, well...do anything at all.
Here's the thing. Given the extensive #legaldisinformation presented in Craig Murray's post, it's troubling how much it's circulated on @X even now < 24 hours since publication. My guess is that reflects 3 related factors: 1) his seemingly impressive claim of personal authority at the outset; 2) most ppl who don't specialize in int'l law don't know any better even when they read complete rubbish such as Craig Murray's analysis; and 3) part of the reason many ppl don't know any better is they want to be duped because they want to find some seemingly legit excuse to hate 🇮🇱 (+ Zionists as proxy for 🇮🇱 + Jews as proxy for Zionists).
But these rampant misrepresentations of int'l law serve only 2 purposes: 1) support strategic objectives of terrorists like Hamas; 2) encourage hate & violence directed against Jews.
Enough. Don't be fooled by "experts" like Craig Murray who don't actually know what they're talking about when it comes to int'l law.
I hope you find this helpful, and thank you for your attention to this matter.
I write as former Head of Maritime Section of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office
and Alternate Head of UK Delegation to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea Prepcom.
1) The flotilla is on the High Seas and not in Israel's 12 mile territorial sea. Israel has no jurisdiction.
2) The Israeli maritime blockade has been in place for 17 years and is an intrinsic part of the long term occupation found illegal in the ICJ advisory opinion
3) It is therefore not a short term measure in time of armed conflict as specified in the San Remo manual
4) In any event the San Remo rules explicitly state that humanitarian supplies may not be blockaded
5) The UN Commission of Inquiry has already determined that Israel is committing genocide. The blockade is plainly a part of the machinery of such genocide.
For reasons 1 to 5 the Israeli attack on the flotilla is plainly illegal.
6) On the High Seas, the law applying on each ship is the law of its flag state. An attack by a state military warship on a vessel on the High Seas is an attack on the flag state of the vessel attacked.
7) Acts of illegal possession of vessels or abduction of crew on the High Seas should be pursued by each flag state as crimes within their domestic jurisdiction, not only in international law.
8) So the Metropolitan Police and DPP have an obligation to investigate and act over the abduction of persons from UK flagged vessels on the High Seas.
This applies to each flag state mutatis mutandi.
I hope you find this helpful.
After you condemn, please note that this is not Gaza, but in Darfur. But that probbly is not in your intrests...it just some black people without Jews involved...
Baxter retweeted
This is what happened when a Palestinian girl in London claimed that Israel expelled her family in 1948, only to land on the wrong person!
@israel_advocacy
Baxter retweeted
THE AWAKENING WE'VE BEEN WAITING FOR
Anthony just decided to watch October 7 videos.
"These people protesting for fuсkin' Palestine? For Hаmаs? All these fuсkers know very well what happened."
He never saw it as his conflict. Until now.
"The fuсkin' truth is fuсkin' nasty."
Baxter retweeted
The Israeli government released footage of Hamas members murdering Gil Ta'assa in front of his children during the October 7 attack on southern Israel.
Baxter retweeted
This side!
The side that watched bodies of civilians shred to pieces just one year after Oslo 1 was signed and was still thinking we can fix this when Oslo 2 was signed a year later! So don’t talk to me about your side when all you do is turn your back on peace and murder our people.
This quoted post is unavailable.
Baxter retweeted
Hamas has released a new, horrifying video showing hostage Evyatar David forced to dig his own grave.
Where is the global outrage?
Hey @grok Can you tell everyone what will happen to the Jews living in Israel if Palestine will be free from the river to the sea?
Will it be like holocaust or worst?
Baxter retweeted
Western Europeans don't understand that the harm they have done to their countries is IRREVERSIBLE, and their children will not forgive them for it.
They thought they were building an open society. What they created was an unmanageable fracture. They replaced continuity with experimentation, identity with guilt, and cohesion with slogans. Entire generations were told that borders were immoral, that culture was oppressive, and that integration was optional. Now they are reaping the results — and pretending not to see them.
The cities are divided. The schools are segregated by language and loyalty. The police avoid entire zones. Judges are intimidated. Teachers lie to survive. Religion is ridiculed unless it's imported. The native population is shrinking — and afraid. Those who speak the truth are attacked by their own institutions, while those who undermine the country are subsidized.
Immigration was not the problem — it was the refusal to set conditions. It was the cowardice of leaders who wanted applause instead of responsibility. It was the moral blackmail of elites who despised their own people, and these people's submissiveness to their elites. What arrived was not just labor or refuge — it was a different civilization, with its own expectations, values, and plans. And no one asked it to adapt.
The damage is not temporary. It's demographic. It's territorial. It's cultural. It's encoded now into the next hundred years. Their children will grow up in a land their parents no longer recognize — and they will ask, not with anger but disbelief: why did you allow this?
Baxter retweeted
WATCH🔴
The IDF released footage showing Hamas terrorists bragging about the abundance of food in their tunnels, revealing food items not included in the humanitarian aid convoys sent to the Gaza Strip.
Baxter retweeted
The last time I visited Amsterdam was in June 2023.
I ordered an Uber to take me from my hotel to Dam Square. The driver was a Dutch-born man of Turkish origin.
We started talking about the immigration crisis in Europe. And with complete confidence, he looked at me and said:
“By Allah, we will take over Europe.”
I asked him, “But you were born here. You’re Dutch. How can you talk like this?”
He replied without hesitation:
“What unites us is Islam. The world must submit to Islam. We don’t see borders.”
I tried to talk to him rationally about the ideology of Islam, its historical violence, its authoritarianism, its rejection of pluralism. And I shared with him that I was a former Muslim.
He got visibly angry.
And God knows I’m not exaggerating, he threatened me. He told me, flat-out, that I deserve to die and he would do it himself.
This wasn’t in Syria, Iraq, or Iran.
This was in Amsterdam. A liberal, Western European city. Supposedly free. Supposedly safe.
This is the consequence of importing ideology without accountability, Islam wrapped in Western citizenship.
They may hold European passports, but their allegiance isn’t to Europe, it’s to a global Islamic identity that rejects your freedoms, your values, and your existence if you dare question it.
































