BASELINE exposes the truth behind AI’s unstoppable rise.

Joined October 2024
BASELINE retweeted
Elon Musk
@elonmuskAug 13
16,237
27,539
3,691
296,216
10,483,213
Tacit know-how is the most important part of human knowledge And it's the part AIs don't have Big tech is preparing to capture it on an industrial scale If we don't act to protect it, the consequences will be enormous (see clip below) There is one way to fight back: Prometheus @Dr_JohnFletcher described Prometheus on 10 February in this interview: youtu.be/3q1RhqoV3mw?si=-tC1… See here for the full Prometheus vision: xitter.cf/Dr_JohnFletcher/status… Yesterday, Prometheus Swarm, the first step towards realisation of this vision, was Open Sourced: xitter.cf/tigfoundation/status/2… Find out more at tig.foundation
This is something that @Dr_JohnFletcher has been warning about for a while now.. Tacit Knowledge I'll admit, John opened my eyes to this as I hadn't previously given it too much thought.. Most people view their relationship with OpenAI and Anthropic as a one way thing.. We prompt the model with a problem and it gives us back an answer.. pretty simple But every time we interact with these models, we also reveal something about how we think What to try.. what to avoid.. why certain approaches fail.. the way we ask questions.. all that intuition that we've built through years of experience That is Tacit Knowledge.. Its the valuable, unwritten expertise that can't be found in papers or textbooks.. but its an extremely valuable ingredient when it comes to innovation Not every prompt instantly trains the model.. the deeper issue is that these massive AI companies are becoming embedded within millions of workflows And over time.. this gives them extraordinary visibility into where these valuable problems exist and how experts solve them It also gives them an insight into which industries are ready to be disrupted next Which means.. the very company supplying the intelligence could absorb enough knowledge and market insight to compete with the businesses, or even partners using it It then becomes a really powerful flywheel.. An expert uses a model > The model learns from the way they solved the problem > The company supplying the intelligence grows stronger capabilities > Those capabilities then become competing products against the expert or business using it Its a real issue that inevitably leads to all power in the hands of a few morally questionable centralised mega companies This is one of the core problems $TIG is trying to address.. #Prometheus is an open algorithm discovery system where swarms of AI agents explore, code and test thousands of ideas in parallel Experts are able to guide those agents with their own tacit knowledge.. But, the key part is.. Without having to publish or surrender the underlying expertise to the wider swarm or @tigfoundation.. which means the tacit knowledge itself doesn't need to be shared So the knowledge can still influence the algorithm produced.. but the expertise stays locally with the contributor Instead of that tacit knowledge being absorbed into a closed corporate flywheel.. $TIG's building an open one Private expertise from the human > AI agent discovery through #Prometheus > Which leads to better algorithms > They're independently benchmarked and validated > Rewards are then routed back to the contributors What gets shared is the breakthrough.. not the tacit knowledge that helped create it This results in the value flowing to the researchers and experts who helped create it.. rather than exclusively to these AI companies With the added bonus of their private tacit knowledge remaining with the contributor rather than becoming public property.. or being handed over to OpenAI or Anthropic The goal being rewarding those who are truly changing society for the better.. While preventing humanity's accumulated knowledge from being willingly handed over to these centralised companies who have the potential to abuse it for their own gain $TIG
5
25
6
127
14,414
Prometheus opens algorithm mining up. Anyone can run it and compete for the rewards.
2
20
2
118
3,904
BASELINE retweeted
I don't want a "Smart Fridge" that orders milk for me. I want a fridge that lasts 25 years and doesn't have a privacy policy that allows it to share my late-night snacking habits with my health insurance provider.
494
16,368
195
173,100
1,398,943
sounds important $TIG
Most people think you can't capture value from Open Source because open means people will always take it for free But as Phil explains below, this isn't true. It's never been true, at least for larger companies, who are the vast majority of the market So what's the real issue? The way to capture value, and use that value to fund further open development, was identified 25 years ago In "The Magic Cauldron", Eric Raymond explains whats required: a market to price code econ.ucsb.edu/~tedb/Courses/… But no one ever figured out how to create such a market In 2016, I had the idea that proof of work could create a market for a very particular type of open code.. Algorithms for "hard to solve but easy to verify" problems But how useful is this in the real world? It turns out, it's everything we need
1
13
59
1,583
Most people think you can't capture value from Open Source because open means people will always take it for free But as Phil explains below, this isn't true. It's never been true, at least for larger companies, who are the vast majority of the market So what's the real issue? The way to capture value, and use that value to fund further open development, was identified 25 years ago In "The Magic Cauldron", Eric Raymond explains whats required: a market to price code econ.ucsb.edu/~tedb/Courses/… But no one ever figured out how to create such a market In 2016, I had the idea that proof of work could create a market for a very particular type of open code.. Algorithms for "hard to solve but easy to verify" problems But how useful is this in the real world? It turns out, it's everything we need
What stops companies using TIG algorithms without paying? Community enforcement.
6
26
8
93
24,281
BASELINE retweeted
Starship’s thirteenth flight test is preparing to launch as early as Thursday, July 16 β†’ spacex.com/launches/starship…
884
3,123
557
20,151
4,831,487
This was a fantastic chat with @BaselineAI from 3 months ago. If you haven't watched it, now it a good time as we discuss things that are only coming to pass now. The clear path we're on, given current incentives, is: 1. Use AI tools like Claude Science to capture know-how/tacit knowledge (the knowledge that AI does not already have, because it was never written down) 2. The tool improves due to having this knowledge. Quickly becomes so good it is indispensable, meaning even scientists that object to the capture (because they know where it leads) cannot realistically opt out. 3. Once enough know-how is captured so tool no longer needs the mass of human researchers, it is immediately declared "too powerful" and a "national security risk" and public access is withdrawn. 4. It is then used to control the world, a major component of which is stopping any research that could lead to AGI. Is this what we want? Has anyone heard the above scenario proposed/discussed before? If not, why not? @beffjezos @elonmusk
This is a great discussion with @Dr_JohnFletcher from $TIG A lot of important, juicy topics they dig into but one thing that stuck out to me.. Everyone is individually incentivised to use AI because its faster and makes them more productive.. But all they're doing is feeding that tactic knowledge back into centralised systems Which means.. 1. You opt out.. but you fall behind 2. Opt in.. but you help build the thing that will likely replace you later This is why.. there needs to be systems where incentives are redesigned at a fundamental level.. So that value flows back to those who contribute, instead of leaking away to one company This is why we $TIG.. youtu.be/3q1RhqoV3mw?si=6yvx… Highly recommend giving this one a listen πŸ‘ $TIG
2
23
1
78
8,866
calling all cypherpunks.. for one more mission.. $TIG
Replying to @MachSpeedMkts
We may be closer to agreement than it appears. To be clear: I am not claiming my argument is established beyond reasonable doubt. The evidence I have presented is not sufficient for that. But that is not the right standard to apply here. The question is not "has this been proved?" but "is the mechanism plausible enough, and the consequences severe enough, that we should act?" Given what is at stake (a possible monopoly over the means of mathematical discovery) I think the burden of proof runs the other way. Those who are capturing this data should be asked to demonstrate that the mechanism described will not, in fact, produce the outcome described. On the question of what to do: I sketched out a proposal in the second half of this interview. The relevant part starts at around 23 minutes youtu.be/3q1RhqoV3mw?si=iWNo…
3
21
682
BASELINE retweeted
no offense but never has there been a moment in my life where i’ve wanted to hear a bunch of β€œpanelists” speak at a conference lmao. like i get actively repulsed by that entire concept.
46
26
7
748
40,576
if this doesn't go viral dead internet theory is proven biggest threat humanity's ever faced no one even knows it's happening $TIG @elonmusk @DreadBong0 @satyanadella @tigfoundation @0x_Asuka
2
7
24
1,780
BASELINE retweeted
2003 might be the worst year to be born 2008 - parents lose all their saving 2011 - too young for bitcoin 2020 - senior year in zoom 2021 - college in lockdown 2026 - get replace by AI 2038 - might die in the space war
538
3,116
322
72,700
8,960,980
Replying to @BaselineAI
I agree assistants are getting more capable. The next step is measurable reliability, things like task completion rate and correction loops matter more than wow demos.
1
1
22
BASELINE retweeted
Elon Musk
@elonmuskFeb 15
Great name πŸš€
Trung Phan
@TrungTPhanFeb 15
SpaceX has a custom version of Grok…and it’s called Spok. Glorious.
2,749
3,778
239
55,183
24,434,161
BASELINE retweeted
The most beautiful 29 seconds in modern engineering. Rockets don’t just launch anymore.
184
717
35
7,728
423,365