Pinned Tweet
Napi miért emigrålunk rovatunk 1
Naponta tĂzezer darab Nemzeti Sportot vĂĄsĂĄrol a kormĂĄny
telex.hu/belfold/2023/06/12/âŠ
Balint P retweeted
most ppl donât realize is that thereâs no climbing out of this. once it becomes cultural & baked into the collective psyche, itâs pretty much over.
reversing it would take an act of god or some once in a century black swan. otherwise itâs like trying to pull an aircraft out of a flat spin with 900 feet of altitude & no engines left.
This quoted post is unavailable.
Australian authorities relentlessly pursued me through the courts and ultimately fined me $24,000 for holding a blank sign outside the Brisbane Chinese Consulate.
But when my car was broken into yesterday and I lost $1000 worth of stuff, nothing could be done. The police officers told me that whoever did it will probably never receive punishment. Even if they are found they will probably never even be charged.
This is ANARCHO-TYRANNY. If you are a naturally compliant, high trust individual like a polite young university student holding a non-disruptive protest against the CCP, the Australian government will absolutely crush you with the full power and might of the state. Because Iâm not a feral meth addict spitting on police.
If youâre a meth addict vagrant who spits on police officers and assaults people and breaks into cars, you can do anything. The state basically lets you do anything. Your behaviour is essentially de facto legal and nobody will touch you.
Pure and total demoralisation and depression. Why work? Why contribute to society? Criminals will just steal from you and authorities will do nothing. If anything they will probably go after you instead.
Balint P retweeted
"If you are smart or talented, your primary purpose in life is to be a slave to the retarded, lazy and useless"
Youâre unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
Balint P retweeted
đ°Ăgy lopja LĂĄzĂĄr a következĆ milliĂĄrdjĂĄt. Az ĂĄltala vezetett âJövĆ NemzedĂ©k Földje AlapĂtvĂĄnyâ INGYEN megkapta a Concordia KözraktĂĄr Zrt-t AZ ĂLLAMTĂL. Most pedig egy ĂĄltalam megkapott dokumentum szerint 1 MILLIĂRDĂRT ADJA EL ezt a cĂ©g tulajdonĂĄban levĆ, a RĂłzsadomb lĂĄbĂĄnĂĄl, a Kis RĂłkus utcĂĄba fekvĆ Ă©pĂŒletet AZ ĂLLAMNAK. Az egy milliĂĄrdot meg majd szĂ©pen kiveszik a cĂ©gbĆl, ahogyan eddig is kipakoltak minden pĂ©nzt, amit a rĂĄjuk bĂzott cĂ©gekben talĂĄltak.
đđ»ââïž A tulajdoni lapon mĂ©g nem lĂĄtszik a tranzakciĂł, de mĂĄr megtörtĂ©nt az Ă©rtĂ©kbecslĂ©s, a Nemzeti VagyonkezelĆ Zrt szerint a MillenĂĄris park melletti irodahĂĄz Ă©rtĂ©ke 1.071.997.016 Ft+ĂFA. LĂĄzĂĄr pedig mĂĄr jĂłvĂĄ is hagyta az ĂŒgyletet. Ărtik? Az alapĂtvĂĄny, aminek mĂ©g honlapja sincs, fogalmunk sincs, mivel foglalkozik, megkapott egy ĂĄllami cĂ©get ingyen, most meg eladja neki az egyik irodahĂĄzat egymilliĂĄrdĂ©rt.
âĄïž A napokban Ărtam arrĂłl, hogy ugyanez az alapĂtvĂĄny összesen hĂĄrom ĂĄllami cĂ©gez kapott ajĂĄndĂ©kba Ă©s azonnal el is kezdte belĆlĂŒk kitalicskĂĄzni a pĂ©nzt: eddig 4.5 millĂĄrd osztalĂ©kot vettek ki belĆlĂŒk. Ez az irodahĂĄz lesz a következĆ milliĂĄrd.
đđ»ââïž Nem megerĆsĂtett, de hiteles forrĂĄsbĂłl Ă©rkezĆ informĂĄciĂłm szerint az errĆl szĂłlĂł poszt mĂĄsnapjĂĄn LĂĄzĂĄr kirĂșgta a Concordia eddigi vezĂ©rigazgatĂłjĂĄt. Hogy azĂ©rt-e mert azt hiszi, hogy tĆle Ă©rkezett az informĂĄciĂł az osztalĂ©krĂłl, vagy azĂ©rt, mert ĂĄllĂtĂłlag akadĂ©koskodott az eladĂĄs miatt, azt nem tudom. Azt szintĂ©n nem, hogy tĂ©nyleg LĂĄzĂĄr rĂ©gi tettestĂĄrsa, Bitay MĂĄrton Ărs lesz-e a Concordia Ășj vezĂ©re - mindenesetre ez a jĂłember mĂĄr benne van LĂĄzĂĄr alapĂtvĂĄnyĂĄnak kuratĂłriumĂĄban.
âŒïž Ăjra elmondom: mindannyiunk szĂ©gyene, hogy LĂĄzĂĄr mĂ©g mindig itt jĂĄtssza az emberarcĂș fideszest, ahelyett, hogy a trafik ĂŒgy (Ă©s szĂĄmos mĂĄs buli) miatt rĂĄ kiszabot börtönbĂŒntetĂ©s miatt a cellĂĄjĂĄban szĂĄmolgatnĂĄ a hĂĄtralevĆ napokat.
âčïž Az ĂĄltalam kapott dokumentumot nem teszem közzĂ© a forrĂĄs vĂ©delmĂ©ben.
#hadhĂĄzyĂĄkos
#fideszmaffia
Balint P retweeted
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella (born in India), has filed for about 5,000 H1B visas in 2025, that i could verify.
they are just laying off Americans and bringing in as many Indians as possible at this point. could not be any more blatant.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Microsoft applied for 183 new H-1B visas in 2025. They applied for 328 visas to be renewed, 1,713 to change job titles within Microsoft, and 398 employees to changed from different employers to Microsoft.
uscis.gov/tools/reports-⊠- click on crosstab view and select Microsoft
Balint P retweeted
Replying to @SpeckleBelly64
I counted 9 B2'S fly over my house. Warsaw Missouri. Heading due east.
Balint P retweeted
We broke every possible social contract for young people, unprecedented wealth transfer from young to old, devalued the currency, made home prices insane, education debt crazy and now for the lulz we're automating all the entry level white collar work. Just incredible
Balint P retweeted
This is the most clear & important explanation about how LLMs work. Remarkably, there are still people who claim that AI canât produce anything original because âit just predicts the next word.â Listen to Ilya to understand what âunderstandâ really means.
Balint P retweeted
When I was a kid, I saw that my abusive dad felt justified in his cruelty to others. If he was mad or hurt enough or some perceived rule was violated, this made it ok to lash out. I found this terrifying and vowed that I would never lash out no matter how mad or hurt I was
Balint P retweeted
Every species has mating rituals. If those mating rituals cannot be performed, they will not breed.
That's why we say of some animals that they "won't breed in captivity". It isn't because they have abstract philosophical ideas about freedom and want to take a stand. It's because the zoo environment has some restriction that disrupts their mating rituals.
In humans, these rituals are partially instinctive, but also must be adapted to culture, so parts of them must be learned.
If these parts are not taught, because they're not understood, or because speaking of them openly is politically off-limits, the next generation will have trouble mating.
If you put a group of unattached young boys and girls, in a room with music, and they don't dance with each other, that disruption, that failure to teach, has clearly happened.
But most people don't understand what was disrupted, or how it's supposed to work... and that's why they can't teach it.
They think that young men are supposed to just have the courage to approach girls. That this is a failure of character.
Wrong.
That's not how the human mating ritual works at all.
If that was how human mating worked, young men would not be afraid to approach women. They wouldn't just be "brave enough" to do it. It wouldn't be scary at all, because the men who were scared by it would have less descendants.
If you're a keen observer of old books and movies, you already know what the basic human mating ritual really is.
But if you aren't, it can be logicked out from what boys and girls are afraid of.
Girls are afraid of embarrassment from being too forward.
Boys are afraid of embarrassment from being rejected.
So, it's pretty clear that girls aren't supposed to be overt, and boys aren't supposed to cold approach. Which tells us everything we need to know.
Correct human mating rituals are covertly initiated by the female.
She signals interest or, at the very least, availability. But she does so in a plausibly deniable way.
He then perceives the hint, and decides if he wants to pick it up. If he does not, she avoids embarrassment because she can pretend there was no hint. If he does, he can approach with confidence because he has been invited.
That's how it actually works.
But for this to work, young men need to know how to pick up a hint. And young girls need to know how to drop one.
And before they can learn how to do it, they have to learn that this is what they need to do.
If you don't understand this, then you try to shame young men into cold approaching, then girls complain about being cold approached, because they instinctively don't like it, and it takes a lot of charisma to overcome that.
Don't bother me at the gym, don't bother me at the coffee shop, don't stop me on the street out in public, etc, etc, etc.
But when men ask them, when should we approach you, then, they immediately bluescreen and start giving nonsense answers, because the real answer is they only want to be approached by men they like, and even they realize that this is impossible without telepathy.
Because they've never been taught how to send a signal that says "I want you to come talk to me" with no telepathy required. They don't even know that's what they are supposed to do.
And with zero instruction or examples, young men would be equally inept at spotting the hints she doesn't know how to drop.
Idealistic political notions about how people "should" be hurt everyone, because they prevent us from dealing with them as they are.
Jack Reacher Won't Ask Girls to Dance
Iâve had a front-row seat to the social breakdown hitting our young people. You can see it in a lot of places, but one of the clearest examples came from a mom in our church whoâs helped run a homeschool prom for several years. She told me something recently that Iâve been stewing on.
When she first got involved, it was normal for boys to ask girls to danceâespecially during the âsnowballâ dances, where the DJ tells you to rotate partners every thirty seconds. Thatâs the whole point: go find someone new, talk, move, risk a little awkwardness.
But this year? The boys wouldnât do it. They stood around, clumped up with friends, goofed off, and refused to initiate. Some danced with each other, ironically of course. Meanwhile, the girls were standing around the edge of the dance floorâwaiting. Eventually, they gave up and started dragging each other onto the floor. Some even went over and tried to coax the guys to come out. It didnât work. There were 2 girls for every guy.
The DJ repeatedly re-explained the rules and purpose. Didnât matter. Nothing changed. He was baffled by it. It didn't use to be like this.
The next day, one of this momâs younger daughters said something that sums it all up: âIâm graduating, and Iâve never danced with a guy.â Contrast that with her older sister, who just seven or eight years ago came home from prom having danced with seven or eight different young men in one evening.
Somethingâs shifted. Itâs not just social anxiety or awkwardness. Itâs paralysis. Itâs absence. And yeahâitâs unsettling.
The same trend was the focus of a recent video from Charisma on Command, titled âThis Shift in Masculinity Is Scary.â It uses the Reacher series on Amazon Prime as a cultural case study. Reacher is a walking male power fantasy: big, competent, calm under pressure, lethal in a fight. And yet, in the modern adaptation, he is oddly passive with women. He never initiates anything romantic. In fact, the women have to all but throw themselves at him just to get a kiss.
This isnât how Reacher was written in the books. And itâs not how male leads used to behave. Go back and watch The Girl Next Door or Casino Royale. Whatever flaws those movies had, the men at least wanted somethingâand they acted on it. Desire was visible. Rejection was a possibility. And risk was part of the reward.
Thatâs whatâs missing now: initiative. Reacher has been reimagined into a man who wins without wanting. He gets the girl without having to pursue her. Thereâs no risk, no rejection, no emotional vulnerability. Heâs strong in every arena except the one that requires personal agency.
And the problem isâitâs not just fiction. The video rightly points out that more and more young men are living like this in real life. They arenât avoiding women because theyâre ascetic or holy. Theyâre avoiding women because theyâre afraid. Afraid of rejection. Afraid of misreading a situation. Afraid of being embarrassed, canceled, or misunderstood. So instead, they scroll. They lift. They build. They wait. They distract themselves endlessly, preparing for a moment they never plan to seize.
I thought this was overstated, but I digress.
Itâs not that they donât want anything. Itâs that theyâve lost touch with how to act on what they want. Theyâve been taught to suppress desire instead of disciplining it. Theyâve learned that passivity feels safer than pursuit.
I used to think this was mainly a problem in my own circles. Iâve harped plenty on the socially stunted sons of Reformed householdsâthe boys who can quote Theologians from memory but canât make eye contact. But letâs be honest: this isnât a Reformed problem. Itâs a cultural one. Weâre just producing our own brand of it.
A lot of young men today have rightly rejected the old âjust be yourselfâ lie and embraced the call to âimprove yourself.â Thatâs a good shift. You see more of them focusing on fitness, career goals, and personal discipline. But that growth often stalls out when it comes to relationshipsâespecially with women. Theyâve learned how to level up, but not how to move toward someone.
Theyâre told to develop themselves but warned off pursuit. So they become hesitant, uncertain, stuck. Whatâs needed now is the courage to carry that same sense of purpose into the social realmâto risk, initiate, and act with clarity and resolve, even when the outcome isnât guaranteed.
So maybe we need to say this to our sons directly: If you like her, ask. If you want something, step up. If you get rejected, survive it. But donât stand on the edge of the dance floor waiting for someone else to make the first move.
P.S. This is merely one angle of the dilemma. I know there are issues with the girls as well. Next time.
Balint P retweeted
Imagine if the population of Boston started going back to Ireland and kicking off the irish from their homes and claiming that they (the Bostonians) are the true irishmen and that the irish are actually british and then push them all to County Sligo and then bombard it
Balint P retweeted
Periodic reminder that you control what content you see!
If you want to see more original travel and architecture photography, then interact with this post by liking and sharing and the algorithm will give you more content like this ;)
Balint P retweeted
Yes. My answer IS "tough shit."
Just like your generation's answer to millennials and zoomers who were unable to get a job, buy a home, have a family, or save for our own retirement was "tough shit."
This is your karmic reckoning, carefully curated from the moment you abandoned the unwritten obligation every generation has always had to leave the world a better place for the next.
You stole our jobs, you stole our houses, you stole our pensions, you stole our rents, you stole our futures, and you made the world infinitely worse for us in every way - all so you could have a boost in your portfolio and spend a historically unprecedented 20 years at the end of your entitled lives sitting on a beach in Florida.
You know why millennials and zoomers don't care about what's happening right now? It's not because we think we'll "make it up later." It's because we've already accepted we will never make it up. This is a normal day for us. This has been our reality our entire fucking lives lmaooo
Welcome! Enjoy! Pull yourselves up by your bootstraps, skip the avocado toast, and print off a few resumes.












































