
Lead audience developer, manager @CollectiveAud. My digital thing #digitalmedia #digitalmarketing #socialmarketing #contentmarketing My passion is adventure
New York City
Joined April 2012
- Tweets7.3K
- Following3.9K
- Followers3.5K
- Likes7.1K
Brian T. Petterson retweeted
VP of Product Roy Kim summarizes the critical bottlenecks limiting AI system scalability and how photonic interconnect technology addresses these challenges. We look forward to continuing this discussion at AI Infra Summit, where Founder & CEO Nick Harris will be taking the main stage on day one. More info: lightmatter.co/event/ai-infr… @theanalognick @ConvergeDigest @NextGenInfra_io @AvidThink @WireRoy
Brian T. Petterson retweeted
Congratulations to team @stoke_space on an incredible journey and $1b Series E to launch into space, and change space access forever. 👏👏👏👏👏👏🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
Today, Stoke announced a $1 billion Series E, bringing our total capital raised to $2.3 billion.
This funding will help us bring Nova Pathfinder to flight, accelerate development of our larger 15-ton-class Nova Block 2 vehicle, and build the production capacity required to fly at scale.
This milestone reflects years of extraordinary work by the Stoke team and the conviction of customers and investors who share our belief that fully reusable space transportation is both possible and necessary.
We are deeply grateful for their trust, and more energized than ever by the work ahead.
Read the full announcement: stokespace.com/news/stoke-sp…
Brian T. Petterson retweeted
Replying to @ycombinator
@truefoundry just launched a fantastic next-generation open source agent harness. Paired with their AI Gateway lets enterprise teams build, deploy, and govern production agents on any model or MCP server. As an alternative to Claude Managed Agents at 50% lower cost.
Brian T. Petterson retweeted
🚨 BREAKING: Today’s the day!!
@PalabraAI API is up and running - real-time speech-to-speech translator - no third party dependencies.
If your project uses speech in more than one language, here’s what you get 🧵
Brian T. Petterson retweeted
HUGE news: we built the world's fastest text-to-speech model 🔥
@covaldev’s independent benchmark just ranked @PalabraAI #1 in latency.
- 104ms time to first audio.
- 2x faster than the nearest competitor.
- Ahead of ElevenLabs, Cartesia, and every other major lab.
The pause is officially gone.
Brian T. Petterson retweeted
Congratulations to our CEO and co-founder, Jeff Cardenas, for being named one of Austin Business Journal’s 2026 Power Players! 👏🦾
We believe Austin is the perfect place to build the future of humanoid robotics. Jeff’s vision has helped put the city at the center of the physical AI revolution. We’re proud to see him recognized alongside leaders shaping the future of Texas innovation and their industries.
Check out the full 2026 @MyABJ Power Player list here:
bizjournals.com/austin/news/…
#humanoids #apptronik #robotics #austin
Brian T. Petterson retweeted
Huge congratulations @stephenbalaban & the Lambda AI team!
@AnthropicAI has signed a $35 billion cloud-computing deal with Nvidia backed neocloud @LambdaAPI for a Texas data centre with a capacity of about 350 megawatts. m.economictimes.com/tech/art… #AI $NVDA
Brian T. Petterson retweeted
A comprehensive guide to dominating search in the age of AI-powered engines, generative results, and multimodal content understanding.
collectiveaudience.co/blog/t… #AImarketing #SEO #MarketingSuccess
Brian T. Petterson retweeted
We're thrilled to announce our new website launch!
OUR MISSION
At Collective Audience we're reinventing advertising with conversational experiences that capture attention and turn every impression into an interaction and outcome across all environments. CollectiveAudience.co
Brian T. Petterson retweeted
Sam Altman just reached the same conclusion Nick Harris did a decade earlier during his @MIT post-doc: light, not electronics, is computing's next leap.
Nick founded Lightmatter in 2017 to build it. By April 2025, Nature published proof: the first photonic AI processor running ResNet, BERT, and Atari like DeepMind.
Full story: l.businessinsider.com/s/vb/I…
Nick's take: lightmatter.co/blog/a-new-ki…
@sama @OpenAI @theanalognick
Brian T. Petterson retweeted
$CRM and Anthropic Announce Claudeforce
"Salesforce and Anthropic are announcing Claudeforce, an expanded strategic partnership bringing Claude’s intelligence and reasoning together with Salesforce’s trusted enterprise harness to make its data, workflows, business logic, actions, and governance securely accessible to power agentic experiences wherever work happens.
The Claudeforce partnership launches with Salesforce in Claude, a Plugin with 37 prebuilt sales skills that enable sellers and agents to reason over live revenue context, automate pipeline updates, and take governed action right from Claude — with the power of Salesforce directly where sellers work. The companies plan to introduce more integrations across Claude, Salesforce, and Slack, expanding each company’s use of the other’s technologies."
research.alpha-sense.com?doc…
Brian T. Petterson retweeted
The state of GPUs and handing over the CEO role
@stephenbalaban gave me a masterclass on the current state of GPUs, and where the whole industry goes next.
From co-founding @LambdaAPI 14 years ago to handing over the CEO role this year, he's seen every phase of this industry up close - probably more than any other founder out there?
In our latest podcast episode, @stephenbalaban shares:
1. The current state of GPUs
2. 2026: is this the breakthrough year?
3. Starting a company with your brother
4. Stepping down as CEO
5. Not raising from traditional VCs
6. GPUs becoming an asset class
7. How many AI models will there be?
8. Partnering with Jensen Huang
And much more.
Thanks so much for coming on the show @stephenbalaban!
Available everywhere you listen to podcasts.
(link below)
Brian T. Petterson retweeted
$CRWD CEO George Kurtz says the Mythos moment they flagged in spring, as expected, showed up as a growth driver and tailwind in their results. Technologies addressing rogue AI agents and shadow AI, like AIDR, had a phenomenal quarter, while Cloud, Identity, Next-Gen SIEM, and Endpoint were all accelerating, with exposure management growing given that companies cannot keep up with patching.
"So, as we mentioned in the spring, the Mythos moment was building, and as we told you, it was going to be a growth driver and a tailwind for us, and you saw that show up in our results. When we think about AI agents going rogue, when you think about the need for protecting AI and understanding where shadow AI is, it all points to the technologies that we're building and delivering here, like AIDR, which just had a phenomenal quarter. No surprise, obviously, Cloud identity Next-Gen SIEM Endpoint were accelerating and exposure management, which is a big element now given the fact that companies can't keep up with the patching.
So when you put all of that together, it comes to what we said the Mythos moment was a point of acceleration and we see those tailwinds continuing."
Brian T. Petterson retweeted
$SNPS CEO Sassine Ghazi says he is not worried about AI models bypassing commercial EDA tools end to end without their participation, because these models are not static and constantly need to learn and retrain. Accuracy and determinism are essential for autonomous chip design workflows, and customers will not invest hundreds of millions of dollars without confidence it will work. He views this as a significant demand opportunity for their software across training and inference rather than a threat, with Synopsys proactively engaged with customers on building these autonomous workflows.
"I don't need to go back or go as far as 10 years ago. You're right around 2017 we introduced and invested and saw great results with DSO.ai centered around reinforcement learning. If you look at the last three years, the focus was around Copilot generative AI move to agents. Right now we're talking about autonomous designs.
As you start looking at an autonomous workflow, the most important thing is accuracy and determinism. Customers will not invest hundreds of millions of dollars in a product without having the confidence that it is going to work. The portfolio we have with the sign off leadership is essential to building these autonomous workflows. We are participating with our customers on how to achieve an autonomous workflow. It's not like it's happening without our participation. We're proactively engaged with them to re-engineer how they're looking at the future of engineering with AI being the center of that evolution.
I am not worried at all that at some point that model can do the end to end without our participation. Because you have to remember these models are not static. They're constantly changing. They constantly need to learn. So the opportunity is the opposite. It's not a threat. It's a significant demand for our software to train to inference to constantly enable that faster design to deal with the complexity. And we're at the center of it."
Brian T. Petterson retweeted
$NVDA CEO Jensen Huang says AI agents use roughly 15 to 100 times more compute than a human using the same tools, depending on the problem. Their broader business beyond hyperscale cloud, including sovereign AI, NeoClouds, AI startups, and enterprises, represents about half of their business and is growing 100% a year, which he expects to eventually be larger than what they currently see in cloud. Despite demand being much greater than 70%, supply allows them to confidently deliver 70% growth, which they are guiding to for the first time in order to give customers, shareholders, and the supply chain a consistent view.
"As you probably are aware, AI has become useful and the AI agents that are being adopted everywhere use an enormous amount of compute. First of all, the large language models are larger than ever because they're smarter than ever. And these agents go through reasoning and planning multiple, multiple turns of tool use. The amount of compute necessary for an agent versus a human using it is probably 15 to 100 times depending on the type of problem you're trying to solve. And so the amount of compute necessary is just extraordinary. That's a factor that almost everybody sees.
The part that people don't see about our growth because we're practically singular, because the nature of how we deliver products, we're the only company in the world that creates and builds, offers an entire AI factory platform, a full-stack system and customers can still mix and match. However, most companies just don't have the skills to do that or desire to do that. And so there's an entire part of the market that we experience growth. There's sovereign AI, the original IaaS, there's NeoClouds there's AI startups, there's enterprises where we're seeing, which represents about half of our business and that's growing 100% a year, that part of the world's computing is likely to be larger over time than even what we're currently experiencing in the cloud. I think the demand that we see is driven by all of those factors.
It is also the case that you can no longer procure technology per se and stand up this infrastructure. You've got to go secure the land, power and shell, which oftentimes is a couple, two, three years out. All of the rest of the supply chain necessary to align the construction, the power, the cooling, all of the labor that's necessary. AI infrastructure is creating so many jobs all over the United States and all around the world, it just takes a lot more planning. And so we're involved in securing infrastructure now further down the pipeline.
Just as a long time ago people asked me why it is that we're working with memory suppliers when we're a chip company? And today people understand it's really quite genius that we were working on our supply chain so far. Upstream we work with power generator companies, downstream we work with land, power and shell companies all around the world. And that helps prepare all of this computing that's going to be built that will ultimately deploy for our ecosystem and our customers. And so we just have a lot greater visibility now upstream/downstream
It is the case that we've never forecasted or never guided to a year in advance. And, even though our demand is much greater than 70%, our supply allows us to confidently deliver 70% and we're going to continue to work with our supply chain to increase on that.
But what we wanted to do is to be consistent with everybody from our customers, our shareholders, our supply chain. Everybody sees the same view. And the reason why that's important is because, everybody's putting a lot of resources at play. And so we wanted to make sure that everybody has the same set of information.
And we've got a huge year coming up next year and it's going to be pretty extraordinary."
Brian T. Petterson retweeted
Great @AlphaSenseInc interview + insights re why neoclouds are expanding beyond compute to compete with hyperscalers $GOOG $AMZN, $MSFT, $CRWV, $NBIS $IREN. If you’re in venture rounds or the public CO’s you need to read. It’s going to drive scale via massive #AI M&A cycle
Interview with an industry expert on why neoclouds are expanding beyond compute to compete with hyperscalers ( $AMZN, $MSFT, $CRWV, $NBIS ):
- The expert highlights a meaningful shift in how companies think about AI spend over the last six months, with the focus moving away from training and fine-tuning their own models toward finding the cheapest source of tokens at scale. As bills from frontier providers like Anthropic, OpenAI, and $GOOGL have skyrocketed, neoclouds are becoming an increasingly attractive alternative, offering open-weight models at meaningfully lower cost with a quality gap that is narrowing fast.
- The cost difference between running workloads through Bedrock on a frontier model like Anthropic versus using a neocloud with an open-weight model is significant: a specific workload costs a few hundred dollars on Bedrock compared to under $50 on a neocloud. The gap comes down to the underlying cost of frontier models, which carry a premium as closed ecosystems managed entirely by the provider.
- The expert sees GPU workload optimization as the primary differentiator between neoclouds, with the best ones investing heavily in research to process workloads as efficiently as possible and minimize power consumption. Beyond raw efficiency, value-added services like workload batching, AI-specific storage solutions, and security mechanisms also help them stand out.
- The expert confirms that Fortune 100 companies are taking a much closer look at AI spend after costs increased by as much as 600%, with open-weight models becoming attractive as a way to meaningfully reduce token costs without significant optimization effort. The operational difference between frontier and open-weight models is real but not dramatic, typically requiring a dedicated testing team rather than a fundamentally different engineering capability.
- According to the expert, hyperscalers will continue to dominate among the most regulated industries like the government and three-letter agencies where certifications and compliance requirements make switching impractical. That said, the expert expects the market to even out over time, with neoclouds gaining ground by expanding beyond pure compute into storage and networking, effectively becoming smaller versions of hyperscalers with a broader service offering.
Brian T. Petterson retweeted
Big open source #AI launch!
Congrats @TrueFoundry on today's launch of TrueForge. Open-source, MIT-licensed, benchmarked at up to 50% lower cost than Claude Managed Agents - a real answer to the gap between agent demos and agents that survive production. trajectoryventures.vc/ai-inn…
Brian T. Petterson retweeted
Congrats to the @TrueFoundry team on launching TrueForge - open-source, vendor-neutral agent harness. The production gap in AI agents is real, glad to see people building toward it! Advancing #AI development speed and reducing costs for the enterprise drives innovation!
Brian T. Petterson retweeted
The model is the engine. The harness is the car.
Santiago's list is exactly what we kept rebuilding for every production agent - so we open-sourced ours.
MIT-licensed. Any model, any MCP server. Repo in the first reply ⬇️
Most agents don't work. Period.
I make a living testing AI applications, and around 80% of the demos I've seen don't last a single day in the hands of a real user.
Creating a production-ready agent is way more complex than people think. Your agent needs to do all of this:
• Manage context across long-running tasks
• Call tools in the right order
• Delegate work to subagents
• Stop for human approval before doing something consequential
• Execute code in a sandbox
• Leave a trace you can inspect when things go wrong
That infrastructure is what we call the "agent harness", and implementing a good one is hard.
99% of people should start off with a good foundation harness instead of reinventing the wheel.
Check out TrueForge, an open-source, vendor-neutral agent harness you can start using right now. The @truefoundry team that's behind this project is partnering with me on this post.
You can use models from different providers and route each task to the model that makes sense.
For context, in a 14-task enterprise-agent benchmark, TrueForge matched Claude Managed Agents running Opus 4.8 while costing ~30% less on the same Opus model, and up to ~75% less when TrueForge routed the work to GLM-5.2.
Here is what you get when you use TrueForge:
1. Open-source (MIT license), so you can just host it on your own infrastructure.
2. Vendor-neutral, so you can use any model that fits each task.
3. The ability to orchestrate tools, manage context, run subagents, and have human-in-the-loop checkpoints.
See the GitHub Repository below.
Brian T. Petterson retweeted
Replying to @Sumanth_077
@Sumanth_077 has put forth the need for TrueForge in an extremely clear way.
Please check the repo in the comments.
Open-source harness for building production-ready AI agents!
TrueForge is the runtime infrastructure layer that handles everything around your agent so you can focus on what the agent actually does.
Building an agent is straightforward. Running one in production is a different problem.
You need streaming that survives reconnects, sessions that persist across server restarts, tool calls that are logged and auditable, human approvals before sensitive actions, sandboxed code execution, and a deployment path that scales from one user to many. Building all of that yourself is months of work that has nothing to do with your actual use case.
TrueForge packages all of it. Connect your model and tools, and the runtime handles the rest.
Three ways to use it: a chat UI out of the box, an HTTP API for building products on top, and a TypeScript library for embedding directly into your own code.
Two deployment modes. Standalone runs as a single process backed by SQLite, one command, no infrastructure needed. Multi-replica runs with Postgres and Redis, deployable via Docker Compose or a Helm chart for Kubernetes.
This is also where open-source agent harnesses become interesting. Developers get more control over the runtime, model routing, and how agents behave in production. TrueForge is open source and lets you run the same agent infrastructure yourself instead of relying entirely on a managed runtime.
On that benchmark: TrueForge matched the accuracy of Claude Managed Agents running Opus 4.8 at around 30% lower cost on the same model, and up to 75% lower when routing the same work to GLM-5.2.
Key capabilities:
• 100% open source, MIT license, self-host, inspect, and modify everything
• Vendor neutral, works with OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, or any OpenAI-compatible endpoint, including open-weight models
• Multi-turn sessions with resumable streaming, MCP tool servers, human-in-the-loop approvals, and sandboxed code execution
• Scales from a single SQLite process to multi-replica Postgres and Redis via Docker Compose or Kubernetes
I've shared the link in the replies!































