𝓐𝓢𝓢𝓨𝓡𝓘𝓐𝓝 𝓥𝓘𝓢𝓘𝓞𝓝 𓇗

After finally getting unsuspended from the Kurdish mass-reporting campaign that got me suspended for one whole day. I'm making it official: I am completely done engaging with Kurds. There is absolutely no reason for me to waste my time or energy on them, especially when I get zero benefit out of it. They've brought me literally hundreds of arguments at this point, and not a single one was compelling. Everything they threw at me from the fake Sumerian etymologies and AI-generated slop to their stolen cultural claims, calling Assyrians and Greeks sandniggers or gypsies, and outright claiming that Greeks, Armenians, or Assyrians don't trace back to Ancient Greece, the Urartu, or the Assyrian Empire was easily debunked with actual primary sources and basic logic. But I am not going to risk my account for them. I'm not sacrificing my platform just because they get extremely fragile and weaponize the report button like absolute cowards. I'm not their teacher, and I'm not going to keep debating people who refuse to read outside their nationalist echo chambers. Unless they suddenly start acting competent and arguing in good faith (which I really and highly doubt) then I am done entertaining them. The block button is free. If they want to live in their imaginary reality where they are the true indigenous Mesopotamians, they can do it without my engagement. I have actual history and a real legacy to focus on. You've wasted enough of my time. And if I see any unfollowed or unpopular kurdish account spamming retarded cycled arguments I'll block them. I have absolutely zero patience left for the same debunked nonsense. I'm not here to educate you or entertain your fake history. Consider this my final warning.

Kurds keep on claiming several things including some Sassanian shahs or Parthian kings, but when you actually crack open the primary sources, the entire modern Kurdish ethnogenesis falls apart. They are desperately trying to retroactively claim every great figure and empire in the region because they lack an authentic ancient legacy. Let's start with the etymology of their own name. They love to pretend "Kurd" is an ancient, proud ethnic identity, but the greatest Islamic historian, Al-Tabari (d. 310 AH / 923 CE), explicitly defined the term as a social and economic category, not an ethnicity. In his History of al-Tabari, he records a conversation: "One of the nomads of Persia." I said, "O 'Abd al-Rahman, do the Persians have nomads?" He answered, "Yes, the Kurds are the nomads of Persia, and it was one of them who advised burning Abraham in fire." . (lib.efatwa.ir/47196/1/240) Persian academic sources confirm this exact usage, stating that Al-Tabari called the Kurds (nomads) of Persia, using the term Kurd synonymously with nomad and shepherd. The term was applied to any mountain-dwelling, tent-dwelling, or nomadic Iranian group. It was a lifestyle description, not a nation nor ethnicity. Even the Parthian King Ardawan V mocked Ardashir I by calling him "a Kurd raised in the tent of Kurds" , proving that "Kurd" meant a tent-dwelling nomad, not an ethnicity. It wasn't until the 11th century that the term even began to be explicitly defined as an ethnonym. lib.efatwa.ir/47196/1/240 bazenmitan.org/%d8%af%d8%b1%… This brings us to the absurd Sassanian claim. Kurds online constantly try to claim Ardashir I and Shapur I as their own. This is historical revisionism at its absolute peak. The Sasanians are unanimously regarded as Persian, and the very concept of a unified Kurdish ethnicity did not exist back then. Yes, the Sasanian dynasty had humble origins their ancestor Sasan was a shepherd, but being a shepherd in Persis (Fars) does not make you a Kurd. The Sasanians built a Persian empire, spoke Middle Persian, and claimed descent from the Achaemenids. The Kurdish nationalists who claim them are just engaging in the same "We Wuz" behavior that they accuse others of.

Kurds are NEVER beating the zoophilia allegations.