APFX77

PLEASE COPY THIS EVALUATION PASSING STRATEGY. if you keep blowing $50K evals, STOP copying trading X guys full porting evals with 3-5 minis. some get unlimited evals. others have $50K+ in payouts. YOU haven't even gotten your first $1K payout yet. here's how i'd approach this: first of all, understand something. that influencer passing $50K evals in 3–5 minutes? he's NOT in the same position as you. some have affiliate deals giving them discounted or free evals. others have already made $50K+ in payouts, so full-porting an evaluation might make sense for THEIR risk tolerance. BUT NOT YOURS. you haven't even gotten your first payout yet. why the F*CK are you risking an entire evaluation on one trade? let's get your first $1K payout before trying to trade like someone who's already made six figures. you literally need TWO things: a tested 2–2.5R strategy (I use the @TTrades_edu fractal model) a risk management plan that gives you a realistic shot at passing that's it. /1 THE PASSIVE APPROACH ONE GOOD TRADE A DAY. this is for traders who have some experience, a tested model, but still struggle to pass evaluations consistently. let's use a $50K futures evaluation with: $3,000 profit target $2,000 starting drawdown buffer 40% consistency rule ONE A+ setup per day an A+ setup means your BEST setup. not some random entry you convinced yourself was good because you desperately need to pass. now here's the risk plan. /2 SPLIT YOUR DRAWDOWN INTO 5 $2,000 / 5 = $400. that's your planned risk per trade. at 2.5R: risk $400 target $1,000 3 winners = $3,000 3 wins + 2 losses = $2,200 4 wins + 2 losses = $3,200 see how simple the math is? you don't need to full-port your account. you don't need to pass in 5 minutes. you need to EXECUTE. with a 40% consistency rule, three $1K winners on separate days would meet a $3K target before costs. three wins and two losses wouldn't be enough, and a fourth winner would bring you to $3,200. of course, that's an example, NOT a guaranteed outcome. /3 THE MOST IMPORTANT PART those five $400 risk blocks are NOT five guaranteed chances to lose. fees exist. trailing drawdown exists. your account's loss floor can move. and if your next loss would breach that floor, YOU DON'T TAKE THE TRADE. this is still aggressive sizing relative to a $2K buffer. if your model, execution, or risk tolerance can't support it, size down. the whole point is to give yourself a structured plan instead of blindly gambling. /4 STOP RUSHING THE EVALUATION this is where most traders mess up. they take a loss. then immediately start looking for another entry. then another. then another. before they know it, they're down $1K and trying to make everything back in ONE trade. STOP. one A+ setup per day. if it's not there, DON'T TRADE. if the target doesn't offer enough room for 2–2.5R, DON'T FORCE IT. the market will be here tomorrow. your evaluation might not. /5 FOCUS ON GETTING PAID FIRST forget the guys posting $10K days. forget the full-port screenshots. forget passing an evaluation in 3 minutes. your FIRST objective should be to build consistency, protect your funded account, and work toward that first payout. once you actually understand your edge and have real payouts behind you, you can reassess how aggressively you want to trade evaluations. but right now? STOP TRYING TO SKIP THE PROCESS. you don't need to look like a successful trader on X. you need to BECOME ONE. btw, i broke down different approaches to passing $50K futures evaluations, including risk sizing, consistency rules and the drawdown math, here: propfirmmonitor.com/research… read it BEFORE buying another evaluation.