All the names, except perhaps one, are Muslim names. In Islam, it is not permitted to steal from the infidels if they are dhimmis living in the House of Islam. If they are in the House of War, however, you still can't steal from them unless they are considered to be fighting Allah and His Messenger. America is regarded as a country waging war against Allah, so stealing from Americans is halal.

Conspiracy theory no more: Not only did @DOGE confirm it — the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has re-confirmed: Illegal aliens were issued Social Security numbers by the Biden–Harris terrorist administration. • 270,425 in 2021 • 590,193 in 2022 • 964,163 in 2023 • 2,095,247 in 2024 — on their way out the door With a whopping 1.4 million illegals on Medicaid. You have been Robbed. Deceived, Blackmailed. Extorted.

The US government sent $2.7 TRILLION in Medicare & Medicaid money overseas to people who were NOT eligible to receive it. That’s 8% of our national debt. Medicare isn't going broke. The money is being stolen.

No hookups. No range anxiety. No rationing comfort. PG5 combines a 43 kWh LFP battery, 1.5 kW solar, and a 75 kW onboard generator for 270+ kWh of total usable energy and 7+ days off-grid. Stay longer with PG5.

The Death of Reason: The Left Is Incapable of True Intellectualism In reality there is no such thing as a Left-Wing Academic. Here is why: The modern left-wing academic is a paradox wrapped in a degree and sealed with a lie. They claim the mantle of intellectualism while systematically destroying the very foundations of rational inquiry. True scholarship demands a ruthless pursuit of truth, no matter how uncomfortable or inconvenient. The left, however, demands the suppression of truth if it contradicts their sacred narratives. They do not seek knowledge; they seek validation. An intellectual who refuses to follow the evidence where it leads is not an intellectual at all. They are a priest in a secular religion of victimhood, and their temples of higher learning have become indoctrination camps. Look at the data. A 2020 study by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education found that 60% of students feel they cannot express their true opinions on campus without fear of punishment. This is not an environment of free inquiry. It is a totalitarian reeducation program. When 90% of faculty donations go to one political party, as seen in FEC records, the idea of "diverse viewpoints" is a joke. They have created an echo chamber so dense that reality cannot penetrate it. They call this education. We call it brainwashing. An intellectual framework that requires the silencing of dissent is intellectually bankrupt. Their history is a litany of failures. Every major economic system they have attempted to implement has resulted in poverty, famine, and death. From the Soviet Union to Venezuela, the body count of left-wing ideology is measured in millions. Yet, they continue to push these same discredited ideas. Why? Because they are not interested in results. They are interested in power. They use the language of compassion to mask a deep-seated hatred for success, freedom, and individual achievement. They claim to care about the poor while their policies keep people in dependency. This is not ignorance. It is a calculated strategy to maintain a permanent underclass of voters. The term "academic" implies a certain level of rigor and objectivity. The left has abandoned both. They have replaced peer review with cancel culture. They have replaced debate with shouting down opponents. They have replaced facts with "feelings" and " lived experiences." This is not scholarship. It is emotional manipulation. A real academic welcomes challenges to their ideas. A left-wing academic calls the police. They cannot defend their ideas on the battlefield of ideas, so they try to shut the battlefield down. This is the tactic of the weak, the cowardly, and the intellectually dishonest. Consider their track record on science when it conflicts with their ideology. They reject biological reality regarding gender. They deny the science of genetics when it comes to race and intelligence. They oppose nuclear energy and fracking, pushing policies that would destroy our economy and energy independence. They are anti-science whenever science disagrees with them. They are not intellectuals. They are activists with a grant budget. A true intellectual follows the data. The left follows the dopamine hit of moral superiority. There is a vast difference, and it is time we stopped pretending otherwise. The era of the left-wing intellectual is over. They have exposed themselves as frauds, charlatans, and enemies of truth. They have no respect for history, no understanding of economics, and no commitment to scientific integrity. They are a cancer on our institutions, and the only way to save our universities is to cut them out. We must defund their departments, fire their tenured radicals, and rebuild our educational system on the principles of truth, liberty, and free inquiry. The left cannot be reformed. It must be removed. Their time is up, and the world is better off without their poisonous influence. (PHOTO: Giordano Bruno was extremely controversial during the Italian Renaissance. Dubbed by some as a heretic and pantheist by others, Bruno suggested that the universe may be infinite and inhabited with many worlds.)

the ottomans banned coffee because it made people too hard to control ben franklin drank 30+ cups a day and helped ignite a revolution before the 1600s, europeans had beer for breakfast...then coffee arrived and sparked the enlightenment & greatest rise in wealth the world has ever seen teddy roosevelt drank a gallon of coffee a day, survived an assassination attempt and finished his speech. coffee makes you your most creative, rebellious, authentic self

Naomi Wolf nails it: The biggest shocker in the Pfizer docs isn’t the side effects we’ve been aware of, it’s that the vaccine is designed to target human reproduction, not the respiratory system, and they’re obsessed with it, 360 degrees of it, as revealed in a stunning revelation. She explains how the lipid nanoparticles are engineered to penetrate every membrane, including the placenta. This causes calcifications that stop babies from getting nutrients and oxygen. The outcome? Midwives say placentas are falling apart, leading to premature births, horrific maternal hemorrhaging, and a 40% spike in maternal mortality in the West. Pfizer knew the nanoparticles would invade the testes of baby boys in utero, degrading the Leydig cells that produce masculinity and fertility. Even if never vaccinated themselves, they may never develop normally. An andrology report confirmed the vaccine stops sperm motility in men. Most damningly, Pfizer warned male trial participants not to have intercourse with unvaccinated women or to use two forms of contraception, defining “exposure” through semen, skin contact, and breath. Out of 270 pregnancies in the trial, records on 234 were “lost.” But of the remaining 36, more than 80% ended in the loss of the baby. Pfizer knew it. Why was it the main focus of their research? Join my channel, stay updated👇 t.me/Official_MrPool

Today in History: Europe Crushes the Ottoman Jihad at Vienna raymondibrahim.substack.com/…

Once you start realizing that every Dem is doing an Obama impression, you'll never unhear it:

Karl Marx – The Man. You know him as the author of the Manifesto. But behind the manifesto there was a man – an envious, deceitful and lazy one – constitutionally averse to productive work. The theory is just a result of that. It is the man, elevated into a system. Do you recognize any of this in the socialists and communists around you? Read on. 1. His father Heinrich was a hardworking lawyer from Trier who wrote his son letters in the tone of a man watching a slow-motion disaster he cannot stop. Not angry – exhausted. "Is your heart in accord with your head, your talents?" he wrote in 1837. "Is that demon heavenly or Faustian? Will you ever be capable of truly human, domestic happiness?" The tone was like: "My heart often sinks when I think of you and your future." The despairing correspondence of a disciplined, hardworking man who cannot understand what is wrong with his brilliant, promising, and comprehensively useless son. A loving father watching his brilliant son consume money, accumulate debts, drink heavily as a student, produce poetry of remarkable mediocrity, and demonstrate a comprehensive inability to translate intelligence into anything useful. A father asking his clever son whether he is a visionary or a catastrophe. The answer turned out to be both. Heinrich died before seeing the full scope of the disappointment. He was spared the Manifesto. 2. He never worked. The foundational fact about the man who devoted his life to the theory of labor. For most of his adult life he was kept by Friedrich Engels – son of a factory owner, manager of a Manchester textile mill – who spent his days doing the precise capitalist management the theory condemned, so that Marx could theorize about it in comfort. Engels also paid the rent, covered the debts, funded the cigars, and at one point claimed paternity of Marx’s illegitimate child – born to the family’s unpaid servant – to protect his friend’s reputation. The servant was not paid. The child was not acknowledged. The theory of "liberation" was produced in conditions of domestic exploitation that would have embarrassed a Victorian mill owner. If you remember Rousseau you’ll notice a pattern here… 3. Helene Demuth – cooked, cleaned, raised the Marx children, and managed the household through decades of poverty that was chronic not because of capitalism but because Marx could not hold a job and would not try. Her specific working-class life was spent in unpaid service to the man theorizing about her liberation. He did not liberate her. He did not pay her. He fathered her child, denied it, and let Engels take the blame. The secret held until after both men were dead. Engels confessed on his deathbed. 4. The debts are almost comic. In one year at university he spent 700 talers – his father noted with incredulous precision that "the richest spend less than 500." Expelled from Belgium, France, and Prussia. Ended up in London, stateless, in damp apartments, pawning the family silver, writing to Engels for money with the regularity of a man who has made extracting funds from a friend into an art form. Several of his children died young in conditions produced by his inability to earn. Marx noted the deaths in letters and continued the manuscript. 5. The envy is the key to everything. A brilliantly clever man who felt the world had not given him his due – who watched others succeed and experienced their success as an offense requiring theoretical explanation. The result: the most sophisticated intellectual expression of resentment ever produced. A complete systematic account of why the successful are guilty, why their success is stolen, and why the man who has not succeeded is the true repository of value. A theory of envy with footnotes. Nietzsche called this ressentiment. He was describing the same type, from a different angle, at roughly the same time. 6. He died in 1883. Eleven people attended the funeral. Engels compared him to Darwin – generous, since Darwin spent twenty years accumulating evidence before publishing and Marx spent twenty years accumulating debt. His wife had died two years earlier, exhausted. His servant had spent a lifetime unpaid. His illegitimate son grew up unacknowledged. The Manifesto was by then on its way to inspiring experiments that would kill approximately a hundred million people. 7. The Manifesto was not written from the bottom. It was written by a clever man funded by a factory owner’s son, who had never done a day of proletarian labor, who exploited the people closest to him, whose father despaired of him, and whose considerable talents were deployed entirely in explaining why the world owed him more than it had given. Look around you. The envious intellectual who has never built anything but knows exactly what is wrong with everything others have built. The "man of the people" who cannot manage his own affairs. The revolutionary funded by the people he condemns. You have met this person. You may have voted for him.