Anti E

I wonder how many actually "died" from USAID being cut, given the contenders for "most ridiculous" USAID spending in Africa? WINNER: LGBTQ+ and related programs in Uganda received multiple grants, including around $600k to "empower" the community against anti-gay legislation and $5.4 million to shift public attitudes toward acceptance plus economic training. This is nothing but funded activism. Local LGBTQ+ groups in Lesotho even pushed back, denying they received that exact sum directly and saying they had no knowledge of such a large allocation. RUNNER-UP: Male circumcision campaigns in Mozambique received around $10 million (part of larger VMMC efforts) to promote voluntary medical male circumcision as an HIV "prevention" tool. It's a bizarre use of US funds for a sensitive cultural practice. THIRD PLACE: Broader patterns include tourism promotion (eg. $6M in Egypt, or other niche social projects that seemed more like imported Western priorities than practical aid. The left will let you know all this was about "saving lives," and they're dead now because USAID was cut.

"People" always fixate on the "lower" murder numbers and ignore the hundreds of farm attacks on White farmers that did not end in murder. In 2024 there were 176 attacks and 37 murders. In 2025: 184 attacks and 29 murders. Had those attacks been successful, the murder toll would be far higher. These are brutal invasions with torture, beatings, shootings, and extreme violence targeting White farm families. Consider the attacks. Consider the attempts to murder. It's a three decade long hunting season in South Africa, and the numbers prove it.

On his farm Waaihoek in the Sheepmoor area of Mpumalanga, around 10 June 2019, 67-year-old Moolman, who had worked that same land for over 50 years, was hacked to death with a panga (machete). The attack was savage. He suffered deep hack wounds all over his head, body, and arms as he desperately tried to defend himself. There were severe defensive injuries between his fingers where he raised his hands to protect his face and head. His body was also struck with a large rock. He was found near a tractor on the farm, with his blood spattered across the vehicle. These personal, up-close attacks leave families and communities in unimaginable pain. Moolman was a hardworking man who simply wanted to farm the land he loved.

Oh, @pierredevos. In other words, “we don’t give preference based on race. We just apply explicit race-based criteria that directly decide who gets admitted and who gets rejected.” How wonderfully clarifying. The Johannesburg Society of Advocates has once again gifted us with this exquisite display of intellectual deficiency, pretending that openly using race to block White candidates isn’t really discrimination, it’s just “transformation.” How very convenient for you all. Keep shining that light on the “false claims,” while the actual numbers of White male advocates keep mysteriously plummeting. We see you.