Anti-war Michigan 8 Libertarian. Sued by @LPNational because we were elected by a majority vote at convention. Not watching your video. #Swiftie
Flint, MI
Joined August 2008
- Tweets63.1K
- Following3.5K
- Followers4.5K
- Likes89.3K
Pinned Tweet
The statist-wing of LP is trying to drag us toward big government with this trademark suit. Help relegate them to a forgettable footnote in our history. Send a message by supporting the real libertarians - donate to the lawsuit TODAY:
lpnm.us/donations/lawsuit/
Turn the darker gi into a cop uniform and change the title to "People who live in cities and keep voting Republican."
.@lydia4ussenate is my choice, but if this is how Stevens behaves after losing an election, looks to me like the primary voters got it right.
AngelaTC - Michigan 8 - #MI8 retweeted
If anyone had told me back in the 1970’s at not a single kid would knock on my door on Halloween night, I’d have called them crazy.
The replacement is complete my friends. The war is done, we’ve been overthrown, and there wasn’t even a battle.
Marco Rubio is the typical TEA Party sellout. Rode to power on that wave then immediately voted against them every chance he got.
AngelaTC - Michigan 8 - #MI8 retweeted
Some folks are missing @PeterSchiff’s point:
ALL government spending is paid for by citizens, through taxes, inflation, interest, AND debt (deferred tax).
The Big Beautiful Bill increased spending by $100’s of billions over the next few years, so it increased what YOU MUST PAY.
AngelaTC - Michigan 8 - #MI8 retweeted
Let's hope @ImpactDogCrates production team is more attentive than the marketing team.
This is an excellent example of why @JulieBorowski 's advice is awful: We all know the GOP candidate in this race will do nothing to advance liberty. But nobody who lost in a primary in either will step up and endorse the Libertarians.
If you’re a fan of mine, he doesn’t want your vote in the midterms. Oct 1, Trump, “Thomas Massie is a sleazebag, comes from Kentucky. He was semi-popular, but not somebody that could be beaten. And I campaigned against him, and I beat him in the election.”
time.com/article/2026/10/01/…
Looks like the new caucus with the fascist-sounding name that is coming to take over the LP at the next convention has recruited Borowski.
Kid, never take political advice from your opponent: each Libertarian dropout serves to shrink the party.
The LP’s product is a ballot line that is not the GOP. Folding when polls tighten teaches voters and donors that the label is merely a cheap bargaining chip.
Marshall Burt's term in Wyoming was far more effective than anything the LINOs have accomplished.
These deals are worse than losing and getting nothing because we still get nothing at the cost of our credibility.
Our members have already rejected the Republicans and the Democrats.
We aren't a lobbying group, or a PAC. We don't exist to lobby and push legislation through. Let's see either party refuse to debate until out candidate are allowed on the stage.
Heck, let's see either party drop and/or endorse us in those gerrymandered districts where the outcome is predetermined.
Sponsoring a bill is a big nothing. The rest of the Republican coalition will oppose real libertarian priorities: ending forfeiture, the drug war, surveillance, or subsidies. That is not a win.
If voters expect the candidate to be pulled whenever it counts, they stop voting Libertarian in the first place.
Stay in those races! Make Republicans compete in public. Let their voters come to the same realizations that hundreds of thousands of others already reached: They're horrible at governing, but the Dems are no better.
What if Libertarian Party candidates used their potential “spoiler” effect as bargaining leverage in close elections? LP candidate will agree to drop out of the race in exchange for something from the Republican like sponsoring or supporting specific legislation. It's better than losing and getting nothing, right? Use your power to get a win.
AngelaTC - Michigan 8 - #MI8 retweeted
When inveterate war hawk Mike Rogers suddenly declares, “The war in Iran needs to end—and end quickly,” you know he’s losing—and losing badly.
AngelaTC - Michigan 8 - #MI8 retweeted
As we have ALWAYS said: if “National Security” becomes the magic phrase that allows all safeguards to be bypassed by the Executive, then anything the executive really wants will be described as a matter of “National Security”.
Disappointing take. It seems to be a coordinated talking point. The 3 GOP mailers I got this week from other candidates all mentioned "the Biden era inflation."
