We need the ultimate guide to all the ways drugs companies scam regulators and the public in the testing phase of approvals. ✔️Surrogate markers ✔️Fake placebos that are other drugs ✔️Short follow up times ✔️Subject bias ✔️Pooled data from several trials ✔️Modeling ✔️Non-relevant end points ✔️Relative instead of absolute results ✔️Testing on non-relevant populations There are probably a thousand other strategies. They are masters of this stuff. Regulators pretend not to see in order to keep the money flowing.

Tony Fauci invoked the Fifth Amendment 111 times during today's hearing but during Covid he was the voice that shredded the Bill of Rights. First Amendment Churches and synagogues faced capacity limits or outright indoor bans while secular “essential” businesses (liquor stores, big-box retail, casinos in some places) operated with fewer or no comparable limits. Pastors were arrested or charged for holding services (e.g., Rodney Howard-Browne in Tampa; Tony Spell in Louisiana). The Supreme Court intervened multiple times, finding certain New York and California rules discriminatory against religion (Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo, South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. Newsom, Tandon v. Newsom). Gatherings for worship, protests, or social purposes were restricted or banned for extended periods. Dissenting scientific or policy speech (lab-leak theory, natural immunity, vaccine efficacy/safety data, off-the-shelf therapeutics, mask efficacy) faced coordinated pressure on platforms via government communications; this became the core of Missouri v. Biden / Murthy v. Missouri litigation, protesting the largest First Amendment censorship effort in modern U.S. history. Vaccine passports or proof requirements further conditioned access to public life, employment, and venues. Second Amendment Some jurisdictions (Los Angeles and Ventura Counties in California, parts of New York, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Mexico, Washington, New Jersey, Pennsylvania) classified gun and ammunition dealers as non-essential and ordered them closed for days to weeks while other retailers stayed open. This blocked acquisition of firearms/ammunition. The 9th Circuit later held certain California county closures violated the right to keep and bear arms because they wholly prevented acquisition. Background checks and sales still occurred in many places via defiance or exemptions for multi-purpose stores. Third Amendment Was there quartering of soldiers in private homes? Yes. House parties were banned. Weddings, funerals, and parties were broken up. Drones flew the skies hunting for too many cars parked out front. Venues were fined for violating capacity limits. Hospitals could not do elective surgery and dentist offices were stopped from doing basic cleaning. The elderly dying alone in hospitals were kept there, not allowed to be home with family. Families prohibited from visiting elderly homes for which they were paid. Fourth Amendment Contact-tracing programs, exposure-notification apps, and location/data collection were  warrantless surveillance Tracing requiring data on contacts of infected persons and were extracted and uploaded to to bulk metadata programs. Quarantine enforcement and some testing/isolation orders proceeded with limited individualized process. Privacy bills were introduced in Congress but broad mandatory apps were not uniformly imposed. Fifth Amendment Stay-at-home orders functioned as extended house arrest for healthy people; “non-essential” businesses were shuttered by executive decree, destroying livelihoods and supply chains without individualized hearings. Vaccine mandates for federal workers, contractors, military, healthcare, and (via OSHA) large private employers conditioned employment on an injection—compelled medical treatment without fully informed consent. Courts struck down the broad OSHA private-employer mandate and some federal ones; military religious-accommodation denials produced extensive litigation and career penalties. Bodily autonomy and the right to refuse treatment were repeatedly invoked. Sixth and Seventh Amendments Court closures and delays produced massive backlogs. Speedy-trial rights and civil jury trials were postponed for months to years in many jurisdictions, leaving defendants and litigants in limbo. This was treated as logistical necessity rather than deliberate suspension, but the practical effect was widespread justice delayed. Vaccine injury? Forget it: the courts won’t hear you because shot makers had a liability shield. Eighth Amendment In prisons, COVID-positive or exposed inmates were placed in conditions described as windowless, filthy, high-security isolation cells with severe restrictions on movement, showers, and property—conditions previously associated with disciplinary or death-row housing. Courts found some deliberate-indifference failures; broader claims about overcrowding, inadequate medical response, and isolation as de facto punishment were litigated under “cruel and unusual” standards. Ninth Amendment Unenumerated rights claims centered on bodily integrity, medical autonomy, freedom of travel and association, parental rights over children’s schooling/masking/vaccination, and the freedom to skateboard, surf, or just take a walk. Lockdowns, school closures (with documented learning loss and mental-health impacts), and pediatric mandates were sweeping peacetime restrictions on ordinary life. Tenth Amendment Federal vaccine mandates (OSHA for private employers, contractor rules) usurped traditional state police powers over public health. The Supreme Court invalidated the OSHA rule as exceeding statutory and constitutional authority. Prolonged emergency declarations by governors suspended ordinary legislative processes in multiple states. The overall package—lockdowns of the healthy, discriminatory religious limits, speech suppression, business destruction, and conditional access to work/society via vaccination—were the greatest peacetime civil-liberties intrusion in modern U.S. history, second only to slavery. Courts ultimately reined in some of the most extreme measures, especially on religion and the federal private-employer mandate, but many policies operated for months or years first. Empirical debates continue over necessity versus excess and net harm. But by all means, Dr. Fauci, invoke YOUR rights.

What actually happened over the last five years, just looking at the Covid caper alone? It goes something like this: in 2019 or before, a US-funded biolab in Wuhan, China, one of some 120 in 30 counties, made a virus and inoculation based on an American recipe that leaked and spread, causing worry that US officials would be blamed but they had a fallback: lie about the lab origins and prepare the population for the fix based on a new gene-editing technology that otherwise would never have been approved on grounds that it was too dangerous and not effective. That required buying time while preserving pre-leak immunity profiles via lockdowns for all of 2020 until the injection was available, during which time there had to be mass censorship, deep trauma, manufactured panic, school closures, a removal of other therapeutic options, and millions of business failures, not to mention a shut down of the arts and a printing/spending binge that would hack off a third of the value of the dollar, leaving vast carnage but permitting an indemnified pharmaceutical experiment, meaning that mass injury has no recourse. With low uptake of the supposed inoculation, millions were forced to accept it on pain of losing their jobs. No one has been punished for any of it, and the mainstream media has no interest. Did I get this mostly correct? @grok will correct this post with all the usual orthodoxies you are supposed to believe.