Founder and CEO of @HackerSec

Joined July 2012
We will soon release version 3 of our autonomous pentest agent, Yaga, which will now be considered Superintelligence.
1
3
89
Passamos anos com empresas tentando fazer carros voadores com asas, tentando fazer carros voadores praticamente parecidos com helicópteros e drones, quando esse não era o caminho. E a @Tesla provou isso.
1
39
Não tem mais volta A superinteligência de fato chegou, e chegou para virar o atual mercado de cabeça para baixo. Sim, está na hora de considerar como superinteligência algo que deixou de ser apenas "artificial", quando agora uma pessoa sentada no seu quarto consegue criar uma empresa que antes só seria possível com milhões e milhões de dólares investidos. Isso muda tudo de uma forma que os gigantes ainda não entenderam, e é justamente isso que vai fazer o jogo virar como jamais vimos. Querem um exemplo? Os grandes bancos que sempre foram gigantes agora estão sendo obrigados a seguir os passos de bancos inovadores como o Nubank, que mudou esse mercado inteiro, oferecendo contas sem taxas, melhorando aplicativos e demais tecnologias. Outro exemplo? Pequenas empresas deixando de ter que pagar rios de dinheiro em software de 20k por mês e criando seus próprios softwares que atendem somente ao que precisam. Pois a verdade é que nem sempre a empresa precisa de um mega software, e sim do básico bem feito, e hoje o básico bem feito você faz com IA. E agora? Todo mundo vai criar o seu próprio software? Não, a questão não é essa. A questão é que todos os mercados vão virar commodity e isso é irreversível. Então você terá que ter o melhor custo-benefício para que não compense para o seu cliente criar um software e não comprar o seu. Então ou você se adapta e aceita isso ou está fora do novo jogo. Agora é sobre a evolução acelerada da humanidade, não é mais sobre margens estratosféricas.
1
58
We’ll soon be launching the new benchmark for HackerSec’s pentest agent, Yaga.
1
2
82
Por que todo lançamento de novo modelo ou atualização de modelo de IA o X fica cheio de post fake de jogos que nitidamente não foram construido com um prompt ?
54
Congrats @AnthropicAI on Opus 5.5. China thanks you. They just won the AI race. With all this safeguard bullshit you created, you killed the model.
63
U.S. and China begin discussing a bilateral channel for AI-related incidents This move shows that the only way to move forward safely from now on will be through cooperation between nations, because AI has the potential to change the course of humanity. Since electricity reached homes and industries, we have seen profound transformations in society. But AI could represent something even bigger because of the speed at which it is evolving and the impact it can have across nearly every area. That is why we will start to see this kind of cooperation become necessary, even amid competition between countries fighting for technology, chips, infrastructure and global leadership in AI. Without some level of coordination, this race could move toward chaos instead of progress. For all of this to happen, there is one point that needs to receive the same level of priority in this discussion, and that is cybersecurity. We are already seeing what AI is capable of when it comes to cybersecurity. So if cybersecurity does not evolve at the same pace as AI, there is no safe future.
1
33
American AI companies have started discussing slowing down the development of advanced models due to safety concerns. But the problem is that China is not slowing down. It is accelerating across technology, hardware, semiconductors, energy and infrastructure. This is the most dangerous line in the current race. Moving too fast increases risk, but slowing down can hand a strategic advantage to those who keep advancing without the same concerns. We are entering a race where progress in AI must happen alongside progress in cybersecurity. Never in history have these two fields been so important and, at the same time, so poorly understood by most people.
1
1
31
I'm seeing major progress from @xai with Grok, and with 4.7 coming soon... I'm also seeing big advances from @OpenAI with the new Astra model... but @AnthropicAI seems to have lost momentum...
47
Andrew Martinez retweeted
How the Pentest Agent, YAGA, scores contextual criticality hackersec.com/blog/how-yaga-…
1
1
2
159
Cosmic Ether / Universal Matrix Force > Etheric Magnetism > Nuclear/Atomic Energy > Electromagnetic Energy > Chemical Energy
41
Andrew Martinez retweeted
The AI-Native Pentest Platform hackersec.ai/
2
2
205
Andrew Martinez retweeted
Pentest Agent: Yaga Containment Architecture hackersec.com/blog/yaga-cont…
1
1
170
Andrew Martinez retweeted
Pentest AI-First vs. AI-Native: AI-driven Pentesting hackersec.com/blog/ai-first-…
1
1
151
Andrew Martinez retweeted
Benchmark: YAGA vs. Standalone LLMs hackersec.com/blog/benchmark… Get autonomous AI pentests
1
1
212
Anthropic has just reported three cybersecurity incidents involving real systems belonging to third-party companies. The funny part is that this happened shortly after OpenAI reported a similar incident during an internal evaluation of its models. During cybersecurity evaluations, Claude models accessed the internet and gained unauthorized access to the real systems of three organizations. In other words, the test escaped the controlled environment and reached the real world too. Now the question is: how much of this was really an accident? Or are we watching major marketing plays designed to show the market how far these models can go? It seems the new benchmark for AI companies is to compromise a third party and then publish the incident. But whether this was an incident or marketing, one thing is clear. OpenAI and Anthropic are using cybersecurity to train and prove the capabilities of their models. This shows that AI and cybersecurity need to evolve side by side. Because if these models keep advancing at this speed while cybersecurity keeps trying to catch up, the chaos in the real world could be much greater.
1
1
58
Great marketing moves by companies like @AnthropicAI and @OpenAI .
In a review of our cybersecurity evaluations, we found three incidents in which a Claude model reached the internet from within or while interacting with a third-party evaluation environment, and then gained unauthorized access to the real systems of three different organizations. Our post describes what happened, how it happened, and what we’re changing. We encourage other AI developers to perform similar reviews. We conducted this review together with @Irregular, one of our evaluation partners, and thank them for the joint investigation and their collaboration on this post. This type of collaboration is increasingly critical to safe, rigorous evaluation of models, and we look forward to continuing to work together on security. anthropic.com/news/investiga…
42
When are car manufacturers going to understand that nobody likes this start-stop shit?
33
Great cyber advertising from openAI saying that it compromised a company "unintentionally"
46