@AndreTIi
iAccount based inUnited States
About this account
- Account based in
- United States
- Connected via
- Web
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Making games and robots and sometimes other things. (Formerly: 1X, Meta)
Bay Area
Joined January 2009
- Tweets26.4K
- Following365
- Followers1.5K
- Likes36.8K
Pinned Tweet
I wrote my first substack piece about AI's economic impact, and some reasons why models seem to underperform in the real world.
This is not a good reason to make laws precluding people's rights to run successful businesses and develop new technology.
Concrete risks or costs from further near term development, yes. A general feeling that it's all too fast, absolutely not.
There is always a large constituency opposed to progress, especially progress that disrupts their established careers and lifestyles. This constituency is almost universally bad.
Pretty cool! Unseen environments isn't nothing. But worth paying attention to what tasks are actually shown where they cut. The tasks are fairly simple, and each task is cut separately, rather than one robot following him around doing all these things in sequence.
My guess is the success rate on each of these is not that high, so the cumulative sequence with inter-room navigation would be poor. Dividing it up lets you retake each section as many times as you need to get a good rollout.
This is the real Turing test if you think about it
Two days ago, GPT-6 Astra broke a yet unsolved German Army Enigma message from 1941. Amazingly Astra was able to autonomously:
- Search historical archives
- Compare uncertain letters
- Find contextual clues
- Build an Enigma simulator
- Write cryptanalysis code
- Run parallel experiments
- Test competing keys
- Recover the plaintext
- Cross-check the results
1/n
Andre Infante retweeted
GPT-6 Astra can solve some seriously tricky spatial constraint tasks: from unlocking interlocked parts to threading a rope through three rings.
Try it yourself now 👇
qinengwang-aiden.github.io/d…
I taught a robotic hand to walk on its fingertips.
Usually an arm takes the hand to the work. We wanted it to get there without one, then use the same fingers to do the job.
Meet Fingers as Legs.
Video: youtu.be/yGoW5WHBf20
Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2609.17172
Andre Infante retweeted
Zero-shot navigation of complex terrain. The true advantages of humanoid robots are their ability to work in the true difficulty of human environments. All using onboard sensing and compute. Take a look ->
One of the key advantages of legged robots like humanoids should be how effectively they can move across a wide variety of terrain types to accomplish their task. But Light-Loco-Parkour from the team at Light Origins aims to change that: using only onboard sensing, they show a policy which can decide when to walk, vault, climb, or otherwise traverse as it moves through a complex environment. Unlike many others, it uses sparse seeds instead of relying on a large motion corpus, learning when to use its skills to move around without specific sub-task labels. @ChemXiaodao and @Yuntao144 join us to go into the details.
Watch Episode 104 of RoboPapers now, with @micoolcho and @chris_j_paxton, to learn more!
Was able to tweak the harness and hardware setup and get it to ~succeed at the snack tray test on attempt 3 (first attempt cancelled due to a system prompt issue, second attempt killed because it dropped the OJ and couldn't reach it)
Pretty crazy how well it works, considering.
There are definitely issues. Its understanding of dynamics is weak. It really struggled to understand the limits of the IK solver when trying to do the overhead grasp to get the bar out of the drawer. But this is a very non-trivial task for a robotics model.
I still think someone's eventually going to do the dexcap / UMI idea with myoelectric hand tracking and it's gonna be awesome. Occlusion proof, force aware, no glove awkwardness.
Hill climbed the setup here a bit. Gave it limb collision detection, RGB-D cameras, and a boom cam, which makes it much less clumsy about its physicality. Seems much better at reasoning about stuff it can see. I also told it it was being graded on speed, is now much faster.