The BBC’s Local Democracy Service was launched to fill the local democracy deficit resulting from the decimation of local newsrooms. The LDRs (local democracy reporters) do a great job but the country could probably do with more of them @bbcpaddy
Queued behind 5 people at polling station this morning just after it opened, and there were 4 people in the other queue. Good to see it busy. Democracy in action!!
With just over a week until #generalelectionl2024 , a reminder on what some of the main political parties are promising in relation to health (from the perspective of UK medical specialists)
thelimbic.com/uk/what-are-th…
No.70 from C5 in Bristol City Centre should have left 10 mins ago. Bus here but no driver in sight 🤷♀️ @FirstBSA
OMG this is so f*cked. The app should be banned and removed from all app stores immediately bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-…
As context for earlier tweet about Bristol mayoral office strategy to undermine @BristolLive and its reporters, here the mayor retweets @bristol247 version of the story (also positive, but lacks balancing fact that Bristol has voted to scrap the directly-elected mayoral model):
🌍 Honoured to be among 25 mayors from around the world, including Vitaliy Klitschko (Kyiv), Katrin Stjernfeldt (Malmö), and Quintin Lucas (Kansas City), shortlisted for the 2023 @World_Mayor Prize
🗳️ Vote at worldmayor.com
bristol247.com/news-and-feat…
PS This is no criticism of @beardedjourno or @bristol247 or any of its reporters, for whom I have the greatest respect
Amanda Cameron retweeted
Our new documentary film about lying in politics isn't even finished yet but they're already attacking it on the front page of the Mail on Sunday.
Well done @BorisJohnson this was the most effective way of letting me know that you're terrified.
Want to help me uncover the worst thing Johnson has ever done? Join the film's crowdfund: crowdfunder.co.uk/p/thepower…
Head of elected mayor’s office deliberately misrepresents news story about his boss in ongoing strategy to smear the reputation of the newspaper and journalists whose job it is to hold local politicians to account.
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
URGENT - Please send me joining instructions for this morning's MHRA board meeting BEFORE it starts at 9.30am. I signed up for it in plenty of time, but I still haven't received the instructions, despite an email promise from your Events & Conferences Team yesterday
@MHRAgovuk
This is mad… If we have to ask, then something needs to be done pronto to make sure we don’t have to. Ever. bbc.co.uk/news/technology-66…
First balloon of the season! Well that I’ve seen, anyway… #BRISTOL
About to watch Sleeping Beauty live from the Royal Opera House at Orpheus Henleaze in Bristol #ROHbeauty
Amanda Cameron retweeted
Dear @elonmusk I've paid for the checkmark just to tell you this:
1. It doesn't work.
2. You cannot support "free speech" by forcing people to pay for the privilege of speaking as themselves.
3. And at the same time, if we do not pay for the checkmark, then you allow others to pretend to be someone they are not at the cost of authenticity.
4. So, it is both hypocritical and dangerous to take away the legacy checkmarks.
5. Make everyone register in their real name - not a "handle" - to encourage transparency and honesty.
In addition;
6. Anonymity is not transparency.
7. You are not an experienced journalist - nor, it seems, do you understand the difference between "fair" and "factual."
8. It is debatable whether you understand the difference between an opinion and a vetted fact.
9. By your actions, you confuse the difference between public media and state supported media. And being in this business for 40 years, I can say with no doubt that you really do not understand the many problems in today's press. (I can recommend a book to read that will help you get an idea)
10. You cannot support free speech either by suppressing it or giving cover to those who make obstreperous accusations without identification or attribution.
And:
11. You are sacrificing the integrity and profitability of this platform at the expense of anonymous trolls and bots.
12. Either this move is by design or from ignorance. It is still debatable whether it is one or the other - or both. If it's by design you've paid enough money for the platform that it compels one to believe you are ignorant - unless you are getting a boat load of side money from ads and bots, or your goal is to destroy the platform at the cost of what you paid to purchase it. That's an entirely different level of silliness.
13. While I know many who have fled this platform, I have not. I have vowed to stay until the bitter end. Call me stubborn or call me stupid. Don't call me late for dinner. But, that being said, the end seems near - and more and more you look like Slim Pickens at the end of Dr. Strangelove.
- and unfortunately so do I.
14. That being said, it is not yet too late.
15. Restore the legacy check mark. Force real transparency among participants. And support the publication of vetted facts. (see "Fox News" if you want to understand why). Otherwise you've destroyed the village town square and replaced it with the village idiots convention. (See Woody Allen's "Love and Death" for a reference.)
Peace. Love. Rock n' Roll.
And you are not D.D. Harriman. (though count me in on a trip to the stars)
Brian J. Karem
Nothing but respect for the courage of Daniel Waterhouse going undercover to expose the human cost of a broken NHS @Channel4 #dispatches








