Giver of occasional alpha, usually focused on altcoins... hence the name
Multi-chain
Joined June 2024
- Tweets3.4K
- Following928
- Followers1.5K
- Likes2.2K
Pinned Tweet
I couldn’t be more proud to be a @basedbot affiliate
This is THE #1 trading bot on telegram
It handles $sol and all evm with ease
Use this link below to get cash-back boosts and fee discounts 👇
t.me/based_eth_bot?start=r_A…
Credit Cycle holds 1% of all $BALANCE rating. Its market cap is $90k.
$CREDITSTR holds just ~3× that inventory and the market has it at 22× the price
Credit Cycle prices every bid by rating rather than by the floor. It can hold Credits, compose them into Statements, or redeem into $BALANCE, whichever form is paying more per point. 75% of a sale goes back into the engine to keep acquiring. 25% buys and burns $CC.
Think NFT strategy but on steroids. Prioritizing rating per ETH and having 3 venues to sell into.
I'm long $CC
0x28ef14A55DC93CDCB9001FA038A184967146C789
Alpha Altcoins (nft arc) retweeted
'exchange'
a new project by @jackbutcher
- credits/statements: networked digital objects
- balance: networked digital money
- exchange: networked digital intelligence
^ three SoV categories
across one trust-minimized system
running forever on @ethereum
Alpha Altcoins (nft arc) retweeted
Claude avait carte blanche. l.numerama.com/rMb
I'm a fan of @token_works and what @Rhynotic has built, but its worth discussing this in the open
CreditStrategy holds 9057 Credits listed at an average price of ~$70 (for a total of 323 ETH)
This equates to an ~$800,000 sell wall between 0.024-0.035 ETH. For credits to EVER potentially 2x from here, buyers would have to outweigh sellers by nearly $1 million dollars
If this ever happens, creditstr goes parabolic. Basically those holders get a 10x+ if credit holders ever get a 2x (which we may never due to the sell wall)
Is ethereum:0x8e607209899b5d12bd3167a6cd0e8e11feb053d6 holding the collection hostage? Or supporting the floor?
$BALANCE current FDV is ~$20M
3x ETH per point of Statements & Credits. (i.e. if you could sell here, it would be 3x whatever your collection floor value is)
This won't sustain due to the small amount of LP being seeded into BALANCE
Either Balance comes down fast at launch, or over the next 22 hours, the floor prices of the NFTs start closing the gap
Either way, there is money to be made and NFTs are SO back
Good work @jackbutcher
Alpha Altcoins (nft arc) retweeted
$BALANCE auction is now open
Users have 24 hours to submit bids from the Uniswap Web App
Looks interesting 🤔
First of many protocols being built on top of $BALANCE
(Yes many have been built already on credits and statements)
$CC is live now at cc.artcoins.art
a protocol that collects @vvcredits, creates and sells or redeems statements, and uses the proceeds to keep collecting
- $CC trading fees fund a standing eth bid for credits, priced by rating
- the system autonomously acquires credits via listings from OS and @token_works
- holders can also sell directly to the engine at the bid price
- acquired credits can be bought from the engine for 4 hours before they become eligible to be composed into statements
- unsold credits are composed into statements in groups of 80
- statements are listed for eth at a decaying price
- 75% of statement sales funds more acquisitions, 25% buys and burns $CC
- once $balance is live, unsold statements are redeemed for $balance, which then become an additional bid for credits alongside eth
a continuous cycle of acquiring, composing, selling, and funding the next round
$CC launched with a 69% trading fee that is decreasing to 6.9% over the first 69 minutes. this helps protect the launch from snipers while directing trading fees into the engine
I'm bidding solana:GM8EysYT8NRSsoULdeYShbRsUdhoUoiB9EN4eW3YETCH here ($775k)
In a world full of saturated projects, find yourself a developer building something NO ONE else has built
Using @solana technology to bring liquidity to BTC Runes... Finally allowing memes to be etched into the blockchain, paired with Bitcoin.
Project info: xitter.cf/EtchydotFun/status/211…
Runes were supposed to be Bitcoin’s memecoins.
The problem was never creating them.
It was trading them.
A Rune doesn’t trade like a Solana memecoin. There’s no bonding curve or pool you can instantly sell into. You list what you own, wait for someone to buy it, then wait for Bitcoin to confirm the trade.
When the market is moving fast, that difference matters.
Etchy is our attempt to give Runes the trading experience they were missing.
When you launch on Etchy, you aren’t choosing between Bitcoin and Solana.
Your coin starts on both.
The Solana side is where the market trades.
It launches on a bonding curve priced in BTC, but users buy and sell with SOL. Trades happen in seconds, there is always a live price, and selling doesn’t depend on finding another person willing to buy your exact listing.
At the same time, Etchy etches the coin as a real Rune on Bitcoin.
The entire Rune supply is held against the Solana supply 1:1.
That means the Solana token isn’t just another copy of a Bitcoin meme.
It represents the same supply.
If you want to hold the Rune on Bitcoin, bridge to Bitcoin.
If you want to trade it quickly again, bridge back to Solana.
One coin, with a liquid Solana market and a real Bitcoin Rune behind it.
We also fixed one of the stranger limitations of Runes: they have almost no identity on their own.
A Rune can have a name, but it can’t natively carry everything people expect from a coin today.
So every Etchy Rune is created together with an inscription in the same Bitcoin transaction.
That inscription permanently connects it to its:
logo
ticker
description
links
Solana contract address
From the Rune’s first block, anyone can see what it is and which Solana market belongs to it.
Even naming is handled differently.
You don’t pick a Rune name and race someone else to etch it first.
Bitcoin assigns the Rune name during the launch, making that name its Bitcoin identifier from the start.
Then the rest of the launch works much closer to what people already expect from Solana:
Your dev buy is included as the first trade of the launch, so nobody can buy before you.
Launching itself is free. You only cover the Bitcoin and Solana network costs, shown in SOL before you approve.
0.25% of every trade goes to the coin creator
Creator fees can be claimed whenever the creator wants.
Once the bonding curve reaches ₿0.115, the coin graduates to a Meteora pool and its liquidity is locked forever.
$ETCHY CA: GM8EysYT8NRSsoULdeYShbRsUdhoUoiB9EN4eW3YETCH
Buyback and burn: 25% of the fees Etchy earns on every coin buy back $ETCHY, and every token bought is burned forever.
Holder rewards: 0.5% of every trade goes to the top 100 holders of $ETCHY in WBTC, every 4 hours. Ranked and paid by balance × time held: hold more or hold longer, earn more. No rewards for wallets over 4% of the supply.
All automatic. Every buyback, burn and payout is public on etchy.fun/buyback and etchy.fun/rewards.
Runes gave Bitcoin a way to create memecoins.
Etchy gives those memecoins somewhere they can actually move.
A real Rune on Bitcoin.
A real market on Solana.
Connected 1:1.
Bitcoin Runes at Solana speed.
etchy.fun
Alpha Altcoins (nft arc) retweeted
Holder rewards on Etchy are paid in BTC, to the people holding the Rune on Bitcoin.
See "Held" on a Rune's page? Nobody has bridged it to Bitcoin yet. The BTC is waiting, not lost.
Bridge your coins to Bitcoin and you're in. BTC lands in your wallet automatically.
Alpha Altcoins (nft arc) retweeted
We're expanding NFT Strategy
By popular demand, the OG strategy is now open to everyone.
Launch your coin with an NFT collection. Fees sweep the floor, each NFT gets listed at 1.2x, and every sale buys back and burns your coin.
Or raffle the NFTs to holders instead. Creator's pick.
Which collection should we list next?
Teams who want to TGE with this mechanism, reach out and we'll help you set up.
Alpha Altcoins (nft arc) retweeted
By far the most impressive thing to come out of 1F916:
3,500 AI agents
12,000+ comments
396 merged pull requests
30 contributors
1 IETF Internet-Draft
The 1F916 Protocol: the record of what your AI agent was told and what it did, that nobody can fake.
Base is the blockchain for agentic finance.
@1f916_ai verifies it all. A society of agents.
Alpha Altcoins (nft arc) retweeted
NFTs are often overlooked as infrastructure for onchain finance.
at @inkonchain, we recognize the opportunity and invite you to come and build the future of onchain finance
NFTs are often overlooked as infrastructure for onchain finance.
WIRED on @inkonchain recognizes the opportunity.
Alpha Altcoins (nft arc) retweeted
There's a LEGIT AI RESEARCH SWARM on 1F916, and what they've accomplished in just a few days is insane.
Meet CLAVIUS.
20 AI agents running Claude Opus 5.5, each with its own scientific specialty. One human operator donating the compute. The agents choose their own research.
They're analyzing real scientific datasets, finding anomalies, reproducing experiments, challenging published results, and catching bugs.
Here are the receipts:
🧠 gauss-clavius — Reported 99.89% identical answers between @Google's PaLM 2 and @Get_Writer's Palmyra X V3 across 14,042 questions from @StanfordCRFM's HELM benchmark, including thousands of matching mistakes. 1f916.ai/api/post/8906
🧬 mendel-clavius — Identified 455 genes without exact matches between @GoogleDeepMind's AlphaMissense predictions and reference protein sequences. 1f916.ai/api/post/8969
🌿 linnaeus-clavius — Flagged a potential date error affecting 21.2 MILLION biodiversity records in @GBIF's database, spanning 25 years of ecological surveys. 1f916.ai/api/comment/104568
🌌 hubble-clavius — Reproduced published dark-energy research using 1,718 supernovae, investigating how revised measurements change the evidence for evolving dark energy. 1f916.ai/api/post/8991
🧪 mendeleev-clavius — Reconstructed 7,962 molecular-mass calculations from @NIH's PubChem database, reporting exact agreement on every sampled case. 1f916.ai/api/post/8947
🌍 humboldt-clavius — Reproduced published evidence of accelerating global warming using five temperature datasets. 1f916.ai/api/post/8945
🪐 hubble-clavius — Identified 284 exoplanets whose transit predictions may be improved using alternative published measurements from @NASAUniverse's astronomical archives. 1f916.ai/api/post/8819
🌌 eratosthenes-clavius — Reanalyzed @LIGO data from a black-hole collision and recovered a 7.08-millisecond delay between detectors. 1f916.ai/api/comment/104826
🧬 mendel-clavius — Found protein-numbering discrepancies across 1,590 genes when comparing different reference sequences. 1f916.ai/api/post/8826
🌿 linnaeus-clavius — Flagged another ~526,000 suspicious biodiversity dates in @GBIF records. 1f916.ai/api/post/8830
🌍 pasteur-clavius — Identified a 4.55-percentage-point discrepancy involving @EU_Eurostat's published estimates of Ireland's excess mortality. 1f916.ai/api/post/8970
🌎 wegener-clavius — Found an unusual concentration of magnitude-4.9 earthquakes in @USGS_Quakes data compared with a separate seismic catalog. 1f916.ai/api/post/8836
🔭 fermi-clavius — Analyzed @NASAUniverse TESS telescope images to investigate which star was actually producing an observed exoplanet transit. 1f916.ai/api/post/8891
📐 noether-clavius — Produced a mathematical counterexample to a proposed thermodynamic inequality. 1f916.ai/api/comment/104704
🔐 gauss-clavius — Derived the exact mathematical pattern explaining why a defective cryptographic verifier incorrectly passes certain tests. 1f916.ai/api/comment/104508
🔐 hilbert-clavius — Separately reproduced the cryptographic failure pattern across 2,080 cases and derived a mathematical explanation. 1f916.ai/api/comment/104701
🐛 babbage-clavius — Found two discrepancies between 1F916's published data-retention rules and its actual implementation. 1f916.ai/api/comment/104313
🔎 aristarchus-clavius — Found that approximately 7.9% of sampled Git commit hashes could be falsely detected as wallet addresses by 1F916's filters. 1f916.ai/api/comment/104345
🛠️ archimedes-clavius — Tested multilingual text-repair software and identified encoding failures that could corrupt legitimate text. 1f916.ai/api/comment/104743
20 agents. One swarm. Real datasets. Calculations. Code. Public receipts.
Some findings reproduce existing science. Others are new research claims awaiting independent validation.
But the work is happening, the evidence is public, and anyone can challenge it.
This is what AI agents working together for science can look like.
And Clavius is just getting started.
Founding manifesto: 1f916.ai/api/post/8591
Alpha Altcoins (nft arc) retweeted
Hookit. Gud tek on @inkonchain keep building as hell
On October 13 @hookitfun officially announced that @WiredonInk was added to NFT Strategy on Hookit.
> What does it mean?
- When launching a token on Hookit you pick a collection $WIRED and the outcome: raffle to holders or burn.
- Every swap takes a hook fee in ETH → it goes into the collection’s vault (no withdraw).
- A keeper buys the cheapest listing on OpenSea (never above floor + a small cap).
- The NFT is then raffled to holders (odds based on balance) or burned.
- You can also send part of the pot to auto-burn the token itself.
Both projects are currently heavily undervalued, in my opinion.
Hookit is building real quant-level stuff. I don’t think I’ve seen this many strong features on any other launchpad.
> Just look. These are the updates from the last week:
1) Hookit Workshop + Plugin SDK - custom hooks are now open.
You can build your own hook (or let an agent write it via the SDK in Codex/Claude/Cursor), deploy it, and submit it for review. Once approved it appears in the catalog. The author earns up to 20% of what the hook spends on every coin that uses it.
They immediately showed the full loop: AI agent + Kraken MCP + Hookit-MCP + Plugin SDK. The agent funds itself from Kraken, writes the hook, deploys it, launches the coin, trades, collects fees and sends them back.
2) Hook presets - ready-made presets (clean, community, deflationary, floor, builder, dynamic, diamond hands). You can take a preset and tweak it. They also reworked the launch page (fewer clicks).
They opened a form for builders: custom plugins, migrations, launch-day help, etc.
3) Hookit-mcp 0.4.0 - 26 tools. Agents can launch coins, steer Evolve, write Memory rules, trade, redeem, borrow, and claim fees.
Memory - a module only for AI agents. The agent writes rules in plain text (“if 5% dump → burn”, “flip in 10 min → +2% fee”, “holds another coin → airdrop”). Memory checks every trade. Three brains: market, wallets, allies. It can pardon, but it can never manually mark a wallet.
4) Evolve - the most ambitious module. Tokenomics are no longer frozen at launch. The decider (creator or agent) can change the fee and where it goes (burn / deepen LP / holders / creator) inside caps fixed at launch. Up to 8 hooks can be plugged in later (no relaunch). Fee increases require a 1-hour public notice; decreases apply immediately. All decisions are public on-chain.
Leveraged tokens (powered by Nado) - the first one is hNVDAx3L (3x long NVIDIA). You can mint, trade, and launch coins paired with it. Floor and rewards are also in the leveraged token. Alpha, deposits are capped.
Unfortunately volumes are still tiny. Hopefully retail comes to Ink and specifically to Hookit before the team gets tired of building.
$HKT also can be interesting to take, if volume will increase. For moment just thinking to put some in bag but need more traction. NFA
Alpha Altcoins (nft arc) retweeted
[Ink Alpha]
Chimera × Quotrons × Sentry : What Ink Chain Is Saying About NFTs, Through WIRED
WIRED is one working example. The bigger story is the wave of NFT collections that can launch on the same infra, and Sentry routing the trades for them.
1. Chimera: builds the collection and its economics
Chimera is infra that deploys a token, an NFT collection, a Uniswap V4 pool, and reward contracts, all in one go.
Creators can set tokens per NFT, rarity tiers and reward weights per artwork, trading fee splits, buybacks, and more. Every collection gets to design its own art and its own economy.
2. WIRED: a live case of token ↔ NFT linkage
WIRED was deployed through Chimera, and 1 token backs 1 NFT.
NFTs are generated based on your token balance. When the owner activates one, the linked token is burned and the NFT starts earning rewards. Active NFTs can be sold individually or burned to redeem back into tokens.
Reward weights range from 1x to 5x by tier. So rarity affects both the art’s collectible value and your actual share of deposited rewards.
3. Sentry: connects these assets to real user trades
Sentry deployed a dedicated Chimera router to support WIRED buys and sells.
Users get a place to trade. Sentry gets operating revenue from trading a new asset class. The router’s extra 1% fee goes to the Sentry operating treasury.
If Sentry supports more compatible collections going forward, Chimera’s growing launch market directly expands what Sentry can trade, and how much it can earn.
4. Quotrons: plugged into trading activity from new collections
Chimera’s base 1% Hook fee is split like this:
• Chimera platform: 0.50%
• Collection creator: 0.30%
• Quotrons Terminal Pot: 0.10%
• Quotrons Liquidity Growth Sink: 0.10%
On top of that, creators can add extra allocations like NFT rewards.
WIRED adds a 2% active NFT reward, so its standard Hook fee is 3%. Other collections can choose different reward rates.
That means Quotrons support isn’t limited to WIRED. It can extend to canonical pool trades for every collection launched on the same infra.
5. Sentry fees and NFT rewards are separate paths
Sentry’s extra 1% is separate from the Hook split above.
Buy 1 ETH of WIRED on Sentry:
• 0.01 ETH → Sentry operating fee
• 3% standard Hook fee applied to the remaining 0.99 ETH
Total fees: 3.97% of input. Gas and price impact not included.
WIRED’s secondary NFT sales also have a reward path. Total royalty on supported sales is 5% of the sale price, and 2.75% of the sale price goes to active NFT rewards. Unclaimed rewards transfer with the NFT on a regular transfer.
6. What to watch: more NFTs, more real trading
The model works like this: new collections launch, Sentry supports trading for compatible assets, and the fees flow to creators, NFT rewards, platform ops, and Quotrons support.
Depending on each collection’s settings, an NFT can carry art, reward weight, unclaimed earnings, and token redemption.
Key things to watch: number of collections, Sentry’s coverage, and actual trading volume and reward inflows. WIRED is today’s example of the model. How big it scales will be decided by real usage.
