Each time Porsche is in a dire financial crisis, they should replace the 911 with a reimagined pre-996 model and get healthy again before returning to pissing in the wind.
Allan retweeted
(1/6) Glad you’re here @hassanrahim. Yes your reaction is correct. The reason people suddenly want to talk about this is that the cost of production is at the floor. Now that we can will anything into existence with the new tools, the people with the best “taste” are seen as more valuable to organizations than they have ever been. The fallacy is that “taste” is being treated as a credential you can sell. But the fallacy is that “taste” now means something that can be sold and not something that is unique.
ok genuine question and i’m not being obtuse — what is the whole discourse around “taste” right now?
i’ve only ever worked in the creative industry so taste is literally a prerequisite, never really discussed bc you would otherwise not be in the room
so is this “taste” conversation happening bc the world is now run by engineers who are trying to “solve” creativity?
also what the fuck is a moat?
i’m sorry
Allan retweeted
I work at OpenAI and personally think AI has been and will continue to be an extremely beneficial technology to humanity
The conversation should be around how many billions of lives it will save
Allan retweeted
Introducing GPT-6 Astra: openai.com/index/gpt-6-astra…
My flight back to New York is delayed because we mandated cleaner fuel for ships crossing the Atlantic and accidentally stopped geoengineering the weather.
Cars became unbearably ugly just in time for autonomy to force a form change. Now car designers can bless us with nightmares on wheels in previously unimaginable, biblically heinous shapes.
Obvious: You have no business building AGI unless you’re an optimist who believes the future it creates will be excellent.
Also obvious: If you’re building AGI while telling the world AI is a dangerous societal negative, there’s a word for that: evil.
