Joined June 2020
Is this patient having a heart attack? After 10+ years in the ER, it’s still an agonizing question for me I turned the angst into a long paper with @m_sendhil in @QJEHarvard—doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjab046 Tl;dr—machine learning can have *huge* benefit, and help fix docs' errors 🧵
15
142
27
615
In this new paper, we took a deep dive into how to equitably provide patients with opportunities to participate in clinical trials, using COVID-19 as a case study. A research ethics 🧵 /1
"Allocation of Opportunities to Participate in Clinical Trials during the Covid-19 Pandemic and Other Public Health Emergencies" now in Early View. By @KayteSB @HollyLynchez @ChandrosHull @MichelleNMeyer @ruqaiijah @profmohapatra et al #Covid19 #MedTwitter onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/…
1
8
21
I argue here that the NIH's research agenda should better reflect public health needs. To accomplish this, the NIH should address disparities in which diseases are funded, which researchers are funded, and the types of research that are funded.
"The NIH presently spends eighteen times as much on prostate cancer than ovarian cancer per person-years of life lost for every case," @leah_pierson writes. blog.petrieflom.law.harvard.…
1
9
1
44
I'm curious whether this distinction is scientifically relevant, and struggling to see how it is ethically relevant. Re: science - What criteria make a vaccine dose 'part of the primary series'? How do we know that these criteria apply to 3rd dose, but not 4th or 5th doses? /1
Getting the description right at last! #FDA FDA's top vaccine leader explains why Covid-19 'boosters' may really just be the 3rd shot in the primary series Don’t call it a booster it’s the third dose of a three-dose vaccine, according to FDA’s top vaccine leader Peter Marks.
1
6
Re: ethics - Whatever we call 3rd doses, we should evaluate benefits/risks of using them in different ways & choose the best option. Eg, if you think new vax supply should be used as *1st* doses abroad, calling boosters '3rd shot in the primary series' should not change this. /2
1
2
tl;dr - Interested to know the science behind '3rd shot in the primary series,' but don't let this framing obscure real ethical trade-offs in how we allocate vaccines. Getting the latter right seems more important. /end
3
My paper with @anetrid and terrific colleagues @NIHBioethics @NINDSnews is out! Ethical challenges for a new generation of early-phase pediatric gene therapy trials: nature.com/articles/s41436-0… /1
3
5
1
22
-How should investigators engage with highly invested patient communities? -How should investigators navigate disagreements with patient communities that are engaged in a trial? /9
1
1
Please feel free to DM me for a PDF! Extremely grateful to @anetrid, #SaskiaHendriks, and #ChristineGrady for two years of tireless mentorship. And to all of our @NINDSnews colleagues for their collaboration, insights, and inspiring approach to clinical research. /end
2
Check out my editorial on why schools should play a part in disseminating the COVID-19 vaccine.
History shows us schools have the ability to help disseminate vaccines quickly. slate.trib.al/sNEKpFG
3
5
Excited to share this editorial on the ethics of multinational COVID-19 vaccine trials, co-authored with Joseph Millum, Christine Grady, and Dave Wendler @NIHBioethics. Two points worth clarifying: /1
"Even as safe and effective covid-19 vaccines are deployed, there remains substantial value in developing additional vaccines. With careful steps to avoid exploiting people in LMICs, multinational trials can offer an ethical way to accomplish this goal" ow.ly/ljVs50DQkxI
1
8
1
15
2) Some COVID-19 vaccine trials in LMICs are ongoing or already completed. While the requirements we defend would ideally be considered during trial design, some of them can be satisfied retroactively. For example: making safe & effective vaccines available in host countries. /3
1
1
3
This editorial applies existing work on international research ethics to the case of multinational COVID-19 vaccine trials. Grateful to have these shoulders to stand on. Many thanks to the researchers & regulators (acknowledged in article) who helped us think this through. /end
1