Replying to @DouglasKBlair
@DouglasKBlair on @Heritage elections podcast you opened with the statement that “stories about noncitizen voting and voter fraud [have] become disturbingly common.” Common is defined as occurring or appearing frequently. How has illegal voting or voter fraud become common
Replying to @ReichlinMelnick
@ReichlinMelnick @Arosaflores 1. The transformation of USCIS from a benefits granting agency into an entity putting out fires the Biden administration was lighting around the world is what started this. The Afghan parole program….
2…Parole programs created out of thin air that enticed greater and greater numbers to flock to our borders. Give us all a break from your one-sided, half assed perspective.
But as usual @Arosaflores turns off the comments so she doesn’t have to experience any concepts that she disagrees with
Replying to @immreview
@immreview you must be kidding in the latest episode about a future democrat administration abusing an agency’s power. Unlike much of its other actions, this administration is properly using the BIA and its precedential authority. Just because Merrick Garland refused to wield…/1
Replying to @whignewtons
@whignewtons for the govt being irreparably harmed when it can’t implement its policies, Abbott v Perez doesn’t bode well for Trumps tariff case. Abbot cited MD v King and both were about a state being unable to effectuate statutes enacted by representatives of the state. /1
Replying to @NeilScottSiegel
@NeilScottSiegel It’s generally inappropriate for a moderator to extensively provide their opinions on the subject. The role of a moderator is to guide the discussion, keep the conversation balanced and on track, and ensure that panelists not the moderator are the contributors /1
Yes @Arosaflores they arrest people who are obstructing justice by interfering with law enforcement making a separate arrest. That’s how things work except for all the immigration advocates who dawn partisan blinders any time something happens they don’t like
unavailable
Replying to @Arosaflores
@Arosaflores or perhaps the Trump administration’s bold actions are simply a reaction to the Biden administration unlawfully creating new programs that circumvented congress and the statute. Will we ever hear any acknowledgment of that from you?
unavailable
Replying to @lukerosiak
@lukerosiak What you reported on @morningwire today was only half of the story & it’s the half that makes Elon Musk look good as if they didn’t flub their whole fraud payment message at the @socialsecurity. If you’re going to be a journalist, BE ONE and report the whole story /1
Results in SSA showing the dead doesn’t mean they were paid. What you did here is part of the reason America doesn’t trust traditional media and we’ll see if it continues with you and @MorningWire 2/2
livenowfox.com/news/trump-so…
apnews.com/article/social-se…
cbsnews.com/news/social-secu…
Imagine the radical swing left to right if every president removed a significant portion of the federal workforce every time the political party in the White House changed. It would be worse than the regulatory swing that we now experience. /2
Nice that you limit who can reply so you don’t have to see a response.
They get to receive them after the individuals depart the plane. We get to decide how the get to that departure point. And find evidence that all of them were nonviolent?
Replying to @JoshMeyerDC
@JoshMeyerDC heard you incorrect statements on The Excerpt this morning. Investigations revealed that the GEC provided a $100,000 grant to the Global Disinformation Index an organization that compiled lists of media outlets deemed high-risk for disinformation. /1
And finally, internal documents suggest that the State Department attempted to discredit journalists and politicians who exposed or criticized these practices, further intensifying concerns about targeting conservative viewpoints. But will we see a correction, not likely 4/4
Replying to @immreview
@immreview you asked for evidence of USCIS declining to exercise the discretionary authority to revoke an approve petition based on 204(c) but that won’t exist unless you find officer notes in the millions of A files out interview ask current out former adjudicators. /1
Replying to @DavidAFrench
@DavidAFrench listening to the latest episode of @AdvOpinions and I like how you just assume that the allegations against Pete Hegseth are true and conclude that based on those, Ron DeSantis would be a significant upgrade for Secretary of Defense. /1
Just one more thing. When you exhibit that type of behavior I guess you are working for the right media outlet if you want people to lose trust in your work



