Generally I agree, although with the Soviet collapse it I think it would be difficult to say that Russia wants to uphold the world order of 1945. It comes to oppose the Western form, albeit passively at first. For Schmitt the opposition of East and West is a mark like that of the
Land comete un gran error poniendo en el mismo espacio de los derrotados a Schmitt y Dugin. El papel de Alemania como pueblo que fue aniquilado y ocupado en dos guerras mundiales por intentar combatir el orden mundial anglo-hebreo es incomparable con el papel de Rusia luego del derrumbe soviético.
El jurista alemán -que nunca fue nacional socialista sino por conveniencia- se hundió junto a su pueblo.
El papel de Rusia en el mundo, si bien sigue un modo centenario de oponerse a la hegemonía occidental, no es sino el de sostener el orden mundial de 1945.
1
2
132
Hellenes and barbarians, and also the Greeks and Persians (freedom-tyranny). Russia is ruled in time by stability, this is also where it resists civilisation and surpasses it by necessity. The Russian soul thus endures the polytheism of governing forms.
1
3
86
One of the fundamental questions of mass immigration is the extent to which land appropriation has been reversed. Does the relocation and replacement of entire nations amount to war and colonization or is it the result of total production and its predominance over other stages?
"All known and famous appropriations in history, all great conquests - wars and occupations, colonizations, migrations and discoveries - indicate the fundamental precedence of appropriation over distribution and production."
~ Carl Schmitt
4
114
"Prior to every legal, economic and social order, prior to every legal, economic or social theory, there is this simple question: Where and how was it appropriated? Where and how was it divided? Where and how was it produced?"
~ Carl Schmitt
6
116
"Concretely speaking, Nomos is, for example, the chicken every peasant living under a good king has in his pot every Sunday; the piece of land he cultivates as his property; the car every worker in the US has parked in front of his house."
~ Carl Schmitt
8
128
He is nothing, and more imposing than the Sphinx.
The spectre of Europe, and the spectre of man.
After fear, the loss of the doppelganger, despite man's complete lack of distinguishing characteristics. One speaks of the fake, the imposter, but this is only the doppelganger freed of the laws of fate.
3
71
The spectre of Europe, and the spectre of man.
After fear, the loss of the doppelganger, despite man's complete lack of distinguishing characteristics. One speaks of the fake, the imposter, but this is only the doppelganger freed of the laws of fate.
However, this may also be said of the bourgeois who came before them, they were no less industrious and blind to the destruction before them. What is to happen to these figures after the dissolution of nation and empire? Broadly, this is the rule of man after the World Wars.
The same may be said of our workers, what use is it to think of them after the World Wars? They could not even think of themselves even before this, their power was in seeing where seeing is impossible, like the terrible forges of Hephaestus.
Compare Nietzsche's Chinese workers to Heine's weavers or the Manchurian candidates. I do not mean to say that Nietzsche was 'scared' of the proletariat or even the last man, rather I want to situate the class conflict within the greater democratic revolt, that of the species.
7
107
One of the great difficulties for us today is the inability to think beyond single words. One gets caught up in the psycho-technical implications of the offending word and the discussion can go nowhere. This is something less than opinion, let alone the narrow-mindedness of
1
4
201