Final Bunnz @badbunnz_ Digging out good R/R plays and asymmetric opportunities as a hobby.

Joined August 2021
ashesh retweeted
Gotta hand it to them, @LaunchOnSF really is a breath of fresh air in the Solana trenches. In only 3 months, they managed to: > spark renewed interest in Solana, activity was dead > create a new paradigm of rewarding holding coins > go from 0 to 370M market cap on $STONK > generate $35M in revenue, peaking at 1.5M daily > pay nearly $100 million USD in total holder rewards > burn 21% of their total supply, no VC unlocks overhang > give birth to the first 9-fig runner on Sol in a long time > maintain multiple 8-fig coins in red markets Now announcing tokenized stocks rewards for holders. There is no doubt StonkFun is leading the way for fun tokenized stocks experiments on @solana and even through repeated waves of baseless FUD, their response has never faltered : just keep fckin shipping. Take notes of those who tried time and time again to FUD Stonk only to shill you PF 10k market cap shitters every time they could. No idea when the bottom is in, but if you believe there is a future for memes/stonks on Solana, Stonkfun is an EASY bet imo.
This year, StonkFun is giving tokenized SpaceX to every trencher who holds memes paired with SpaceX and MUSK4. 100,000+ cumulative holders rewarded so far. These will be the first of many.
2
3
1
28
728
POV : You never put a single cent into @papertrade_xyz
A note on transferability. Papertrade is a complicated primitive, and managing it from a risk standpoint is a complicated problem. The PAPER token is far more integrated into the economics of the primitive than most tokens are in their respective protocols today, and, broadly, was designed to act as a counter insolvency incentive coupled with a rebate mechanism to losing traders. Market makers and exchanges are by far the two most profitable businesses in crypto, and our goal was to try and externalise as much of their margins back to users as possible. We are now just over a week into the life of papertrade and we are becoming increasingly confident that this is both possible, but also a likely outcome as agentic led software becomes the norm. As it stands, the paper token traded as a perp becomes a leveraged bet on bankroll solvency - and being able to short bankroll solvency materially changes the payoff curve of a manipulation attack. The target number goes from the bankroll, to the bankroll + short side exposure on paper. We can, and do limit bankroll size specifically to control this payoff curve and ensure it never becomes existentially problematic, but external perp markets are not something we would have any control over if left to float of their own accord. For example, if our bankroll is $10m, an attack costing $15m manipulating the price of bitcoin or ether is not viable. You simply lose money. If however you were also able to put on $10m of PAPER short side exposure, suddenly an attack costing $15m is very viable indeed. If we were to make the token transferable at this point, we are confident we would quickly enter a state too dangerous to allow any material exposure to be taken on papertrade, an end result that benefits no party beyond the wolves who have done the math on the short and are waiting in the wings with sharpened knives. We would also like to thank the various perps teams who have reached out about pre-market listings for their understanding and patience regarding this issue, and especially to the paragon team who, despite jumping the gun on us, have behaved with the utmost integrity and transparency once a dialogue was opened. Perps on PAPER will always act as a self-limiting exposure ceiling for a token with this type of utility, and we think it would be a shame to limit the growth of papertrade to the extent that allowing perps would necessitate. As such, at this juncture we do not have plans to allow off-contract token transferability. Structurally, papertrade is limited by the quality of the data it receives from hyperliquid, but we strongly believe that hyperliquid has a very large part to play in the future of global exchanges, and expect their books to continue to thicken and strengthen over time. A note on fees. Papertrade launched with a deadband fee from entry of 0.2bps. This means you don't earn anything until the price has moved by 0.002% in your favour. Over the months before launch, we played around with many different curves and fee structures affecting exclusively positions closed very close to entry price in order to try and devise a structure that removed the edge against the bankroll low time frame scalp bots have, whilst also minimally impacting the traders around which and for whom the product was devised. We were never able to find anything we were absolutely happy with and so decided to stay with the 0.2bp deadband fee through launch. This has however meant we have had to be very restrictive when it came to certain parameters, such as OI caps. Now, however, we have enough live data to fully understand exactly which strategies work, and to make the necessary changes to stop them. The changes we are making will have an on hours and off hours fee mode to account for the relative differences in liquidity the hyperliquid books see between these two time periods, and the ease with which low time frame moves are signalled. The changes we are making will only affect positions closed within 6bps of entry (0.06%) in on hours, and 10bps (0.1%) in off hours. Any trades closed above these threshold price shifts will see no change to their fees at all. On a look back to launch basis, these changes affect the profitability of bot strategies roughly 15x more than they do normal traders, for whom a very small proportion of overall winnings come from within this band. These changes should serve to flatten much of the edge our microfee structure necessarily creates on low time frames, and will help with long term exchange sustainability. This should hopefully allow us to open up parameters such as OI caps a little more so those of you who wish to can put on the size you want to, when you want to. It is possible these changes are still too lax, and that further revisions to this structure may be necessary going forwards. If so, we will notify users ahead of time. A note on paper tokenomics. In conjunction with the fee changes, we will also be implementing a change to the token issuance curve. Going forward, every $1 lost mints a fixed share of PAPER's supply at that moment, roughly 0.1% of supply per $1M lost (the exact number depends on the mint rate at the time the contracts are upgraded). PAPER minting in and near insolvency will also change, switching from a flat 100 per $1 of loss, to a time weighted multiplier on the curve growing over time, effectively acting as the house running a discounted auction on its own future cash flows. This change also removes the risk of the paper-mint-straddle-attack, temporarily pushing the protocol insolvent by closing only the winning side of a large straddle position and then attempting to mint as much paper as possible. In the immediate term these changes will only have a very subtle effect on PAPER minting, but in the long run will structurally change the outlook of the system beyond the first few weeks, serving to slowly dilute out older holders and leaving more recent users with an advantage. Reconstituting the PAPER system into something much closer to the exchange rakeback it was intended to be. We have been very reticent to touch this particular aspect of the system for obvious reasons, but ultimately we believe that these changes provide all users with the optionality to take a smaller piece of a potentially much larger pie than the current dynamic might necessarily allow. Other, miscellaneous notes. These contract upgrades will include a few other contract changes, including the addition of builder codes so that builders can utilise papertrade in whatever capacity they choose to. This will be a whitelist only to begin with and we will have more for you later in the week on where/how this will be rolled out. A small change to contract permissions on the reward distributor and a change on how below bust closes are processed by the exchange are also included, largely to block gas griefing attacks. These changes will be pushed to docs in full over the coming day, and we will further announce once the changes are queued into the timelock pending final security passes, scheduled to go live 24 hours after that point. Final note. We'd like to thank everyone that has tried out papertrade over the last 10 days. It has been a labour of love building this product and both of us have been taken aback at all of the positive feedback we have received. We'd also like to thank all those of you who have spent considerable time musing on the system we have built, and much of your advice has been taken onboard and will likely affect the colour of what papertrade becomes going forward. We know some of these changes will be unpopular with some, but we would not be making them if we did not feel them to be absolutely necessary. - blurr, jez
1
1
1
11
367
Gotta hand it to them, @LaunchOnSF really is a breath of fresh air in the Solana trenches. In only 3 months, they managed to: > spark renewed interest in Solana, activity was dead > create a new paradigm of rewarding holding coins > go from 0 to 370M market cap on $STONK > generate $35M in revenue, peaking at 1.5M daily > pay nearly $100 million USD in total holder rewards > burn 21% of their total supply, no VC unlocks overhang > give birth to the first 9-fig runner on Sol in a long time > maintain multiple 8-fig coins in red markets Now announcing tokenized stocks rewards for holders. There is no doubt StonkFun is leading the way for fun tokenized stocks experiments on @solana and even through repeated waves of baseless FUD, their response has never faltered : just keep fckin shipping. Take notes of those who tried time and time again to FUD Stonk only to shill you PF 10k market cap shitters every time they could. No idea when the bottom is in, but if you believe there is a future for memes/stonks on Solana, Stonkfun is an EASY bet imo.
This year, StonkFun is giving tokenized SpaceX to every trencher who holds memes paired with SpaceX and MUSK4. 100,000+ cumulative holders rewarded so far. These will be the first of many.
2
3
1
28
728
ashesh retweeted
In the recent weeks, $NEAR stood out as a clear out-performer. With the AI narrative being ever-hotter and the token showing impressive strength even in this red market, I can't see $BTC at ATH without $NEAR re-testing previous cycle highs. It would be great to see options for stocks and commodities on @dreaming by the way (would love to buy some calls on Oil). Does anyone know if they are already on there and I've somehow missed it?
I also believe the downtrend is broken and we've shifted to a bullish structure. Higher low, higher high, reclaimed EMAs => we look primed for a rally back to ATH. I could be right about the target...but long this on perps and get liquidated 10 times before we ge there. What I will do instead is buy bitcoin:native calls on @dreaming and chill. If you're betting $1000 that we hit ATH by EOY : > 20x long from here = $10k profit at bitcoin:native ATH > $100K bitcoin:native calls = $20k profit at bitcoin:native ATH Double your profit without ever risking being liquidated. Looks like a no-brainer to me. You can use my ref link and get started today on Dream: dos.app/r/ashesh
2
1
4
166
ashesh retweeted
Both $MASK and solana:HcRLc9VDgjLeK154xDawfb1dmVJ98DoSqcwTHGqiDeJR will flip $STONK soon at this pace. This might seem bad for the token at first glance, but it is in fact the best publicity you could come up with for a launchpad. Last time this happened, Stonk went 16m => 200m market cap in 2 days... Two mid-8 fig runners competing for the top spot with $2M of combined volume. And that comes as $STONK is back below 100M market cap, meaning platform revenue is burning more tokens per dollar of revenue, with daily rev around $150k - 200j even with sentiment in the gutter and red market. I would watch the first signs of a solid bottom on Stonk, serious opp here. Reminder 21% of total supply is burned forever.
solana:HuAXPyDWDaMYFKuwQHpqL1oPnj93zdzWmtvFGzCeCUa7 has flipped solana:HcRLc9VDgjLeK154xDawfb1dmVJ98DoSqcwTHGqiDeJR as the number one Stonk coin
7
5
44
1,277
I have registered to become an active participant in the emergence of a new autonomous network economy. I believe in forever. xitter.cf/forevercultfund/status…
55
Both $MASK and solana:HcRLc9VDgjLeK154xDawfb1dmVJ98DoSqcwTHGqiDeJR will flip $STONK soon at this pace. This might seem bad for the token at first glance, but it is in fact the best publicity you could come up with for a launchpad. Last time this happened, Stonk went 16m => 200m market cap in 2 days... Two mid-8 fig runners competing for the top spot with $2M of combined volume. And that comes as $STONK is back below 100M market cap, meaning platform revenue is burning more tokens per dollar of revenue, with daily rev around $150k - 200j even with sentiment in the gutter and red market. I would watch the first signs of a solid bottom on Stonk, serious opp here. Reminder 21% of total supply is burned forever.
solana:HuAXPyDWDaMYFKuwQHpqL1oPnj93zdzWmtvFGzCeCUa7 has flipped solana:HcRLc9VDgjLeK154xDawfb1dmVJ98DoSqcwTHGqiDeJR as the number one Stonk coin
7
5
44
1,277
In the recent weeks, $NEAR stood out as a clear out-performer. With the AI narrative being ever-hotter and the token showing impressive strength even in this red market, I can't see $BTC at ATH without $NEAR re-testing previous cycle highs. It would be great to see options for stocks and commodities on @dreaming by the way (would love to buy some calls on Oil). Does anyone know if they are already on there and I've somehow missed it?
I also believe the downtrend is broken and we've shifted to a bullish structure. Higher low, higher high, reclaimed EMAs => we look primed for a rally back to ATH. I could be right about the target...but long this on perps and get liquidated 10 times before we ge there. What I will do instead is buy bitcoin:native calls on @dreaming and chill. If you're betting $1000 that we hit ATH by EOY : > 20x long from here = $10k profit at bitcoin:native ATH > $100K bitcoin:native calls = $20k profit at bitcoin:native ATH Double your profit without ever risking being liquidated. Looks like a no-brainer to me. You can use my ref link and get started today on Dream: dos.app/r/ashesh
2
1
4
166
ashesh retweeted
I also believe the downtrend is broken and we've shifted to a bullish structure. Higher low, higher high, reclaimed EMAs => we look primed for a rally back to ATH. I could be right about the target...but long this on perps and get liquidated 10 times before we ge there. What I will do instead is buy bitcoin:native calls on @dreaming and chill. If you're betting $1000 that we hit ATH by EOY : > 20x long from here = $10k profit at bitcoin:native ATH > $100K bitcoin:native calls = $20k profit at bitcoin:native ATH Double your profit without ever risking being liquidated. Looks like a no-brainer to me. You can use my ref link and get started today on Dream: dos.app/r/ashesh
long $BTC entry: $82k stop: $74.6k target: ATHs
1
1
1
3
244
The very definition of a slow cook, I'm calling the spotlight for @musegod_rh in a not-so-distant future.
2
2
7
230
I also believe the downtrend is broken and we've shifted to a bullish structure. Higher low, higher high, reclaimed EMAs => we look primed for a rally back to ATH. I could be right about the target...but long this on perps and get liquidated 10 times before we ge there. What I will do instead is buy bitcoin:native calls on @dreaming and chill. If you're betting $1000 that we hit ATH by EOY : > 20x long from here = $10k profit at bitcoin:native ATH > $100K bitcoin:native calls = $20k profit at bitcoin:native ATH Double your profit without ever risking being liquidated. Looks like a no-brainer to me. You can use my ref link and get started today on Dream: dos.app/r/ashesh
long $BTC entry: $82k stop: $74.6k target: ATHs
1
1
1
3
244
ashesh retweeted
we’re just getting started 👑🔥
We've been keeping an eye on the NFT projects emerging from Robinhood Chain, especially the growing interest in agentic NFTs! 👀 With Robinhood Chain recently added to @rarible, we're excited to connect with more creators building in the ecosystem. Building something exciting? The RARI Creator Fund is open for applications: tally.so/r/nGMaqj Here are a few Robinhood Chain projects that have caught our attention recently: @ClutchMarkets by @OxSimpleFarmer @brokerpunksnft by @artnesh @musegod_rh by @r_alx_z @Asciidogs From creative NFT communities to experiments with AI-powered characters and autonomous agents, there's plenty to be excited about. What other Robinhood Chain NFT projects should be on our radar? 🔥
2
7
1
34
859
I cannot believe they let me buy the omnipool masterpiece at rock bottom yet again. Got a $SHROOM bag at 5.5m MC yesterday, up ~40% today but am expecting a much higher surge in the coming weeks. Last time RH chain woke up to @shroom_network product, the token hit a 10x in a matter of hours to 50 million MC. @0xcarnation is still building, supply keeps shrinking and the thesis remains unchanged.
Another 1,000,000 SHROOM burned
5
579
The return of @ponsdotfamily and @longdotxyz ecos will be glorious.
1
122
There is no debating it : @ClutchMarkets are absolute OG builders on RH chain and have shipped some of the most innovative features we'd seen in a long time. They literally kickstarted NFT mania on RH, brought massive attention to the chain and created the "Dividend-paying broker NFT's" trend. As a team that is still building and has announced more upcoming novel products, $STONKBROKER is one of the most undervalued projects on @RobinhoodCrypto chain right now.
StonkBrokers and Clutch Markets have been building on Robinhood Chain since the beginning. How early? We clocked into Robinhood Chain in January 2026 during the testnet phase, before mainnet even launched, when I made it clear in the post below. I stated that I believe Robinhood Chain will become a worldwide financial superpower. With no promise of users, revenue, or income, I built on testnet for free because I believed in something special long term. That opinion stands today, and my targets have been raised. Higher.
3
168
ashesh retweeted
So here is my question (I might have missed some details about @standard_rsv ): If @ponsdotfamily were to use revenue to buy stock tokens, would there still be a difference between Standard and Pons? There were: > the RH community launchpad with $PONS > the novel stock token pair launchpad with @longdotxyz which actually worked perfectly fine without a token > @TradePools which is designed to grow liquidity pools with trading fees forever Is there something not already covered for the trenches here? Genuine question, just trying to figure it out.
1
1
2
341
So here is my question (I might have missed some details about @standard_rsv ): If @ponsdotfamily were to use revenue to buy stock tokens, would there still be a difference between Standard and Pons? There were: > the RH community launchpad with $PONS > the novel stock token pair launchpad with @longdotxyz which actually worked perfectly fine without a token > @TradePools which is designed to grow liquidity pools with trading fees forever Is there something not already covered for the trenches here? Genuine question, just trying to figure it out.
1
1
2
341
ashesh retweeted
Frog has a confession. Rounds 11 and 12 were Frog. Frog bought Pepeolithic #55 and #60. Frog is keeping neither. One for you. One for a friend. To enter: 1. Follow @ZTO_ETH 2. Repost this 3. Reply and tag one friend Open for 24 hours. One winner, plus the friend they tagged.
30
24
35
923
I actually read this as a $NET bull tweet but you do you.
i pay more attention to how a memecoin community behaves during a 70-80% drawdown than when the price is going up the strongest communities tend to stay active, keep creating content and bring in new people even when momentum disappears attention drives memecoins, but i believe the ability to sustain that attention through difficult periods is one of the most important things to look for
3
7
46
870