How about that comma? amastyleinsider.com/blog/a-q…
Research in Small Packages
jamanetwork.com/journals/jam…
Happy #PeerReviewWeek!
Wondering if AI use is allowed? jamanetwork.com/journals/jam…
See also Leung TI. LLMs in Peer Review—How Publishing Policies Must Advance. jamanetwork.com/journals/jam…
and
Choi B, et al. Invisible Text Injection and Peer Review by AI Models. jamanetwork.com/journals/jam…
"But the science of medicine is ever moving forward, as we are seeing now with the renaming (and reframing) of PCOS as polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome (PMOS)."
amastyleinsider.com/blog/du3…
We typically recommend ordering superscripts in the flow of reading, so top left to bottom right. Alternating above and below might be a little too hard to follow.
How would you order ref superscripts for a timeline with entries both above and below—clear across the top and then the bottom, or alternating above and below per chronology? #amediting @AMAManual
Friends of the NLM In Focus podcast episode features George Lundberg, Annette Flanagin, and Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo discussing the history of JAMA, the evolving role of peer review, and how AI is shaping the future of scientific publishing. @JAMA_current open.spotify.com/episode/0YA…
Hi can you provide the whole sentence so the syntax is clearer (eg, are these modifiers)?
Replying to @AMAManual
@AMAManual Which is AMA preference:
...pain postprocedure
...pain post-procedure
...pain post procedure
Thanks.
Terms to avoid (left column) and preferentially use (right column) for older individuals (updated chapter 11.12.4)
lnkd.in/geKb5DSY
New post on AMA Style Insider:
amastyleinsider.com/blog/glu…
Yes that makes sense, although if you have any doubt that it will be unclear, it never hurts to expand it.
Replying to @AMAManual
@AMAManual Hi, following the rule “not necessary to reexpand the abbreviation after its cimponents have been defined earlier,“
Did you know...there are 73 quizzes available on the AMA Manual of Style site? academic.oup.com/amamanualof…
Test your skills on everything from Abbreviations to Use of Numerals With Units.
ICYMI: Blog entry at AMA Style Insider amastyleinsider.com/blog/7nw…
Guidance on using age and age-related terms in chapters 11.7 and 11.12 has been updated for clarity and precision. academic.oup.com/amamanualof…
It's more of a signal that separates named people from the "and others" term, consistent with however many authors are listed before it.
Replying to @AMAManual
@AMAManual, I noticed that in the short-form reference style, you maintained a comma before “et al.” In light of the fact that “et” means “and,” what is the reason for the comma?
PubMed publishes what is supplied by the journal/publisher. Per NLM's "Citing Medicine," PubMed "displays the article title in the case style used by the journal itself." That is why things look inconsistent with italics.
Replying to @EditorialServi1 @AMAManual
I am more and more firmly in the PubMed Isn't Always Right camp: they offered an AMA-formatted reference sample for an article I was citing, which AMA here (June 6) confirmed was in error. Looking at your example, their wild initial capping of the title of the piece is madness.
The search functionality is restored on the AMA Manual site. Apologies for the interruption in this important tool. academic.oup.com/amamanualof…
Hello, @AMAManual . The search function isn't working properly for the online manual: When I click a link in the search results, it takes me to the TOC rather than the page the link goes to. This has been going on for several days now. Can you help?
Thanks for the examples.
Replying to @AMAManual
And here's another example that has both italics and superscript:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3709…
The entry for “provider” in chapter 11.1 (Correct and Preferred Usage) discourages use of this term in favor of clearer identification of health care professionals, institutions, and organizations.
acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/…












