Focus: Onchain is about playing the traders more than the tokens. Whenever there is a $ANSEM pump, ppl say with zero evidence "yeah they are dumping on you with side wallets" & if you ask for proof, its the same 'blockchain is free for anyone to read'. Specifically from Sept 25th to Oct 3rd, i repeatedly saw 'exit pump' tweets. I went through to debunk those theories & see what if I'm the fool. Here are the findings about those traders: - 897 qualified wallets (> $1000 sells) - 57.2% of wallets sold for a loss - 7.3% sold for breakeven - 35.5% sold for a profit - 47% of wallets bought & held ANSEM for < 1 day & a total of 69% of the wallets bought & sold < 7 days old. So again, the main theme here is short term traders - Median realized PNL: -$48.95 from sell activity of the wallets analyzed - Nearly 70% of the wallets who sold for a loss came from FOMO users. (example of some of the wallets attached below in screenshot) Again, onchain is about playing the traders more than the tokens. The main core holders / majority of top 300 held and did not even sell any again. It was a short term holder flow event mainly by same day flippers and mid size wallets who sold into thin liquidity. & with my previous tweet on the whale who accumulated more, there were other whales who did during the same period: 1) C5T6qMC5d4ozVmBmB5eo88uU7qXyBcZfbNhhPs9tRL7J - another 846K, holds over 1.29mil(~$193,000) 2) 8spEGd9NLZTDh3oBHKNbwdNu6Ws9u857cHEsMBesSwhk - another 684K, holds 1.67mil (~$247,000) 3) 2g9wfpmnsaU6eQsX6dRCXf9Mhiw9BbimzWoQWFRuB97Q - another 585K, over 3.28mil now (~$492,000) Its a battle of the impatient vs patient. Ppl seeing PNLs on FOMO, PUMP & with other runners, they take any chance to cut & chase. Play the traders. Thats how you win in this space even more than ever.