Man City received £949.94m in commercial income from Abu Dhabi sponsors between 2009-2018. Only £119.25m came from sponsors -- the remaining £830.69m were "Tagged Sums" paid by Abu Dhabi United Group (City's owners)

£900m is absurd. Ashamed of the higher ups at City.

Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg are standing together outside the White House. 🔥

Oye they turned up to the hearing and said we made SIX HUNDRED MILLION more than Arsenal in commercial revenue. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

🚨 More details from Premier League statement on Manchester City. The independent Commission found that Manchester City arranged ‘sham’ commercial deals with a number of its sponsors during the period, which were part of a disguised funding scheme, whereby those companies were only required to pay a portion of the relevant sponsorship fees. The remainder was funded by Abu Dhabi United Group Investment & Development Ltd (ADUG), which owned the club. As part of the scheme, further ‘sham’ arrangements, funded by ADUG, were entered into to enable the club to record lower operating expenses than it actually incurred, as well as a ‘sham’ circular arrangement with Fordham, an entity that purchased the club’s players’ image rights, that was funded by ADUG. The purpose of these schemes was found to have been to artificially inflate the club’s revenues, and reduce its costs, by more than £900 million during the affected period, to appear to comply with financial rules. The consequence of this, as the Commission found, was that the club filed misstated accounts and concealed the true state of its finances from its auditors and football regulators. The Commission concluded that ‘by its conduct the club clearly intended to circumvent the PL Rules‘. As a result, Manchester City failed to accurately report its income and expenditure for the purposes of the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Rules and UEFA’s Club Licensing and Financial Fair Play Rules. The Commission found that, had all of the relevant agreements been reported accurately in the club’s accounts, it would have been in breach of both the League’s and UEFA’s spending limits by a very substantial amount.

If Arteta said his preferred striker is Havertz-like striker then he is the most c r a z y man ever to manage a football team. You can’t tell me Merino as a false 9 is not better than Havertz in every part you want to mention. Merino goes to Bernabeu and dropped 2 assists.

It’s time for Vinicius Jr. to find a new profession. Football has left him. 😭

🎶Gyökeres, Viktor Gyökeres🎶 He really deserves all this love. It's been a tough couple of weeks.

Everyone is praising Gyökeres for his performance for Sweden and, as usual, the blame has already been shifted to Arteta for supposedly not knowing how to use him. Yes, we all know Gyökeres is a very good striker when he is played to his strengths. But the real question is: do you want Arteta to completely change Arsenal’s style of play just to suit Gyökeres? And what happens if Arteta changes the system to suit him and it backfires? The situation is not as easy as it seems. The manager has his philosophy, the player has his pattern and right now, it's conflicting.