Replying to @JigarShahDC
Well thanks for the clarity. Let me give you some clarity. The average size project is actually below 300MW. It is also important to know that almost all data center projects are built in phases/buildings. These building are below 300MW too so as the build if there were issues to expand they could pause. People should not throw the baby out with the bath water because of a few mega campus proposals.
Replying to @Girlpatriot1974
Definitely a missle combined with a raptor
Replying to @ChildrensHD
It's clear relatively early on that the vaccine does not prevent transmission. Ideally in the graph below it should go from top left to bottom right IF vaccines operated the way they were advertised.
Replying to @ThomasSowell
Very early on we knew vaccines don't reduce transmission - in fact the data actually shows the opposite. Below shows the county level data - ideally it should go from top left to bottom right IF the vaccines were performing as advertised.
Replying to @VigilantFox
Relatively early on one can see that highly vaccinated counties actually showed higher transmission as defined by confirmed cases per capita. Below are all counties in TX and CA.
Replying to @Empty_America
Me personally I have a goal to backpack with my grand kids at 70+!
Replying to @xiaowang1984
There are many reasons we are seeing the results you are outlining. I have been involved in many IRP and one reason to ponder particularly when in an RTO is involved is the import function. Dependency never feels good so at some level a reduction of dependency results in an increase utilization of assets inside the territory. Ccgt analysis is also a function of market. Ccgt can run greater than 60% but because of market dynamics they rightly choose not - to manage cost. Import capability investments for most utilities is not set at the level of generation investment - meaning they bias to generation with some reasonable reasons but this needs to be continuously tested else why be in an RTO?