A Celtic State Of Mind (ACSOM)

Why accept the Portakabin as the reality when we all know it’s an embarrassing position to be in?

You make several incorrect assumptions in your post. The first being around my source of income. The second around what I have put back into the club (and continue to do so) since attending my first game in 1987. Finally, a point on your blog. If it was popular enough to be monetised, allowing you to work full time on it. Would you?

Despite bombarding me recently, I don’t think he’ll be back. He won’t be missed.

Have you ever watched a game at a Fanzone, Danny, or do you usually attend the Bernabéu in person?

With a ready-made footfall, the footprint of football stadia is highly sought-after real estate.

So you did tune in? Maybe you’ll learn something. Although I highly doubt it.

You appreciate this is a concept and not at the cost planning stage, right?

Who lives off the club, Kevin? Also, are we meant to listen to you via your blog as linked in your bio?

With all due respect, we won’t be held to account by a subservient, anonymous board lickspittle. You have zero credibility. Why would anyone take feedback from an irrelevant joke figure who refers to the execs as “Chris & Michael” in a tragic attempt to pretend that you are in-the-know?

It’s understandable and probably my fault. I’ll iron out the details for the final ‘walkthrough’ concept video.

Charlie had the chutzpah to front up and appear as himself without a blank screen and voice distortion, unlike some… Which part of the interview did you disagree with / did you feel was inaccurate or unbalanced?

It isn’t exclusively about looking back, but I take your point. ACSOM has more global subscribers than the official Celtic Player, albeit their service is behind a paywall. The fact the club’s output can’t compete with an independent may be the reason for a generational drop-off in interest. That’s on the club, though. All the ingredients are there to make it work. We have the diaspora as a captive audience.