Bradley Sutherland (@ACBradS) header
Bradley Sutherland (@ACBradS) profile picture

#avgeek | #cdnpoli | Country Music Fan | Promoter of Canadian Energy | Proud Canadian 🇨🇦🏳️‍🌈| Opinions are my Own

Toronto, Ontario
Joined May 2011
Photo by Bradley Sutherland (@ACBradS)Photo by Bradley Sutherland (@ACBradS)Photo by Bradley Sutherland (@ACBradS)Photo by Bradley Sutherland (@ACBradS)Photo by Bradley Sutherland (@ACBradS)Photo by Bradley Sutherland (@ACBradS)Photo by Bradley Sutherland (@ACBradS)Photo by Bradley Sutherland (@ACBradS)Photo by Bradley Sutherland (@ACBradS)Photo by Bradley Sutherland (@ACBradS)
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
People have known about this scam in OSAP for years now. Ontario is penny pinching 30 year olds who need out of country treatment for rare cancers, while billions of dollars get funneled to well connected fraudsters every year. Make it make sense!
The minister of colleges can’t say how much money has been defrauded from OSAP and can’t say how much the government is looking to recover. The government doesn’t want to “compromise or undermine the investigation” by KMPG. #onpoli
7
55
2
336
6,590
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
Build a Canada worthy of the sacrifices those who came before us made. 🇨🇦
8
54
1,049
By their very definition, temporary residents are NOT permanent residents. They have entirely different impacts. Carney’s immigration accounting is so creative, it should qualify for his own new artist tax exemption. My latest for @nationalpost: nationalpost.com/opinion/sab…
16
52
2
356
5,412
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
We will remember them.
Today, Canada’s Fallen will be honoured and Remembered. Please join us in observing a moment of silence at 11:00 am to mark the sacrifice of those who have fallen in the service of their country. #RemembranceDay #CanadaRemembers
1
22
206
2,885
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
Absolutely adore the poppy display along Bloor St here in #Toronto #LestWeForget
8
30
2
290
3,039
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
Somewhere along the way, our leaders forgot what immigration policy is supposed to accomplish. Immigration policy cannot be about morals, charity or doing the “right thing” as the minister says. Immigration policy needs to be about improving the lives of Canadians and improving Canada full stop. There can be no room for moralizing this anymore. In many cases, the “right thing” for the prospective migrant is not the “right thing” for the Canadian citizen. The collective interests of the Canadian people must be the priority above all else on immigration matters. This was understand for most of Canadian history. The following quote from Minister Diab perfectly summarizes this new kind of thinking. “Also spouses and children, you know, families. We don’t want families to be separated. That is the right thing to do for Canada economically, but it’s the right thing to do.” Everyone wants to be nice and do the right thing. But the federal government has a duty to do the right thing for Canadians above all else. I do not see how this is the right thing for Canadians.
35
184
9
1,042
12,819
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
“In Canada, we take care of each other” By bringing in 950,000 non-Canadians in the country to compete against Canadians while we are: - 500,000 homes short - Down 53,000 jobs this year - Facing 6.7% unemployment rate - 13.8% youth unemployment rate - 26.8 weeks treatment time - 2.35 Million/M food bank use The Prime Minister’s idea of taking care of eachother is very deceptive
In Canada, we take care of each other.
83
575
24
2,935
35,543
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
Canada added no private sector jobs from 2019 to 2024 — U.S. did the exact opposite nationalpost.com/news/canada…
241
767
297
2,359
349,374
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
As we all enjoy our endless, mindless, and difficult commute on the 401 tomorrow. Crammed in next to endless 18 wheel tractor trailer drivers that have less driving skill and have had less sleep than your 16 year old. All while our gov't knows this, has known it for over a decade, and does nothing. You know why.
17
91
1
551
8,805
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
Home invasions will continue to increase. A key factor is zero fear of consequences. Perps know a liberal judiciary will find a ‘social’ reason to excuse the inexcusable. In jail there is a chance for rehab. But walking free means more mayhem.
52
170
13
1,040
16,607
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
The biggest risk to Canada is losing our young people to areas that offer a future.
Info for Canadians Under 30 Combined ranking: median income after taxes: 1 Massachusetts $104,828 2 New Jersey $104,294 3 Maryland $102,905 4 Hawaii $100,745 5 California $100,149 6 New Hampshire $99,782 7 Washington $99,389 8 Colorado $97,113 9 Utah $96,658 10 Connecticut $96,049 11 Alaska $95,665 12 Virginia $92,090 13 Delaware $87,534 14 Minnesota $87,117 15 New York $85,820 16 Oregon $85,220 17 Rhode Island $83,504 18 Illinois $83,211 19 Vermont $82,730 20 Arizona $81,486 21 Idaho $81,166 22 Nevada $81,134 23 Georgia $79,991 24 Texas $79,721 25 North Dakota $77,871 26 Florida $77,735 27 Pennsylvania $77,545 28 Wisconsin $77,488 29 South Dakota $76,881 30 Maine $76,442 31 Nebraska $76,376 32 Wyoming $75,532 33 Kansas $75,514 34 Iowa $75,501 35 Montana $75,340 36 North Carolina $73,958 37 Michigan $72,389 38 South Carolina $72,350 39 Ohio $72,212 40 Tennessee $71,997 41 Indiana $71,959 42 Missouri $71,589 43 New Mexico $67,816 44 Alabama $66,659 45 Oklahoma $66,148 46 Kentucky $64,526 47 Arkansas $62,106 48 🇨🇦 Alberta $62,269 49 Louisiana $60,986 50 West Virginia $60,798 51 Mississippi $59,127 52 🇨🇦 Ontario $58,035 53 🇨🇦 British Columbia $55,334 54 🇨🇦 Saskatchewan $55,115 55 🇨🇦 Manitoba $52,560 56 🇨🇦 Quebec $50,224 57 🇨🇦 Newfoundland and Labrador $49,640 58 🇨🇦 Prince Edward Island $48,107 59 🇨🇦 New Brunswick $47,523 60 🇨🇦 Nova Scotia $46,866
18
47
2
486
26,792
I’ve increasingly come to worry about the rise of “judicial nihilism” (for lack of a better term) in Canada. We have a justice system that spends enormous energy considering the personal circumstances of offenders, their rights, identities, mental health, and prospects for rehabilitation. Yet it seems unconcerned with the victims whose lives have been destroyed, or the public that must live with the consequences when dangerous individuals repeatedly reoffend. I think we need to take judicial reform more seriously, rather than dismissing concerns about overreach and malfeasance as conservative fearmongering. The more I look at recent cases (many highlighted by @sarkonakj) the more concerned I become that our institutions are losing sight of some basic moral values in justice. I’ve been thinking about the principles that should guide us to a more liberal, rules-based approach to criminal justice (I’ll admit that this is hardly new thinking, but I can’t remember the last time I’ve seen them laid out): 1. Justice should begin with victims, whose suffering should never become secondary to the circumstances of offenders. 2. Protecting the public from dangerous individuals must be a central responsibility of sentencing, and we should lean towards caution. 3. Punishment must be a meaningful deterrent and reflect the gravity of crimes. Some crimes warrant permanent imprisonment (if not capital punishment). Some crimes are so heinous that the mere prospect of rehabilitation should not be considered. 4. Repeat offenders should face dramatically greater consequences, including long-term incarceration or asylum to protect society. Nobody with dozens of separate criminal convictions should be roaming freely. 5. Mental illness should determine treatment and facility type, not reduce punishment. The bar for criminal non-responsibility should also be much higher than it is today. 6. Sentencing must apply to those convicted equally, based on actions and responsibility, not race, religion, cultural identity, immigration status etc. The rule of law should be non-discriminatory, the right time to address the “root causes” of crime and pursue social justice is before crime is committed. 7. Parliament needs to figure out how to reclaim its authority, with courts exercising much greater restraint in constitutional interpretations. 8. Judicial “independence” must be balanced with meaningful accountability for serious failures and overreach. The judiciary is not supreme to legislature. I worry that too many political leaders have become uncomfortable defending the very concepts of order, punishment and personal responsibility, as though doing so is somehow incompatible with liberal moral values. They aren’t. A liberal democracy has two fundamental obligations. To protect people from the arbitrary exercise of government power, and to protect them from the violence and predation of others. We cannot fulfill one by neglecting the other. They are together the necessary preconditions for liberty. When the public sees rulings that seem fundamentally disconnected from shared expectations of right and wrong, it erodes trust in the system. Order and public safety are necessary conditions for freedom. The freedom to walk down the street, take public transit, operate a business or simply live peacefully in your own home means little if the government cannot protect you from disorder, violence and criminality. It’s often those with the fewest resources who suffer most when that protection fails. If we want Canadians to have faith in the rule of law, they need to believe that it applies equally, that serious wrongdoing carries serious consequences, that dangerous people will not repeatedly be allowed to victimize others, and that the system will not be careless with the lives and suffering of victims.
“Arnold and Joanne De Jong were in their seventies when three men they had once hired to clean their gutters came back to their Abbotsford home in the middle of the night in May 2022 and murdered them. Arnold was suffocated, his head wrapped in duct tape. Joanne was beaten, and her throat was cut. The killers left with the couple’s cheques, credit cards, and a power washer. The trial judge found they planned to murder the De Jongs because they knew they would be recognized in the course of their robbery. On Monday, the De Jongs’ daughters came to court expecting to watch those men receive justice in sentencing. Instead, they heard the judge declare that the law denying multiple murderers any chance at early parole violates the Charter’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. The cruelty, apparently, lies in making men who suffocated an old man with duct tape and bludgeoned his wife wait 25 years before asking to go free. Sentencing has been pushed to 2027. Canadians settled this question a long time ago, and we settled it twice. A Liberal government in 1997 and a Conservative government in 2011, elected by different voters with different priorities, each concluded that people who kill more than once should be offered no early exit. That is what a free people does with its moral convictions: it argues about them, elects representatives who share them, and writes them into law. One judge has now informed Canadians that the answer they reached together, through two elected Parliaments, isn’t allowed.” - - - I don’t think there is any issue I’ve become more conservative on more than the sickness in our judicial system, even as I’ve become more left than I used to on economics/role of government. It feels like several times a week there is another story that represents a deep miscarriage of justice, ill consideration for victims, or neglects society’s need for and equally applied rule of law or real punishment as a deterrence to crime. I fear there is not enough recourse to judges who reinterpret the constitution to ideological ends better left to the actual legislature. This story honestly makes me sick and it saddens me that there are no practical accountability options for the judiciary in a case like this. @stevestaley thehub.ca/2026/10/21/how-can…
97
293
38
1,466
80,190
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
BREAKING - Canada approved over 722,000 work permits in just the first 8 months of 2026. Ottawa claims it's "fixing" immigration while still processing permits by the hundreds of thousands. 68,300 Canadians lost their jobs in September. On Nov 3rd, they’re dropping the rule that you even have to try to hire a Canadian first. The Prime Minister told us he’s taken control of immigration but all he’s done is manage the optics of it. Credit to @KanwarSierah for the insights & data.
182
1,251
61
4,058
102,345
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
The judge argued that it is “cruel and unusual” punishment to block multiple murderers from applying for early parole. Canada’s judiciary is a joke.
21
104
4
543
7,500
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
As we rise after a devastating tragedy at CFB Wainwright, Alberta, let's keep our military families and all affected in our hearts today and in the difficult days ahead. As 🇨🇦 mourns, we must remain strong and confident in the knowledge that no one stands alone under the sun.
1
1
1
24
1,408
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
Why are current Canadians not being welcomed into these positions ?? Unemployment is 6.5% this makes no sense
🇨🇦 Express Entry high-wage occupations list •⁠ ⁠Comes into effect on November 3, 2026 •⁠ ⁠The list is currently based on data from 2023 to 2025. For your immigration queries, contact us at: 🇨🇦+1 780 710 9635 To book an appointment please click on the below👇link>>>> calendly.com/mewiimmigration
52
102
7
966
36,297