Bradley Sutherland retweeted
People have known about this scam in OSAP for years now.
Ontario is penny pinching 30 year olds who need out of country treatment for rare cancers, while billions of dollars get funneled to well connected fraudsters every year.
Make it make sense!
The minister of colleges can’t say how much money has been defrauded from OSAP and can’t say how much the government is looking to recover.
The government doesn’t want to “compromise or undermine the investigation” by KMPG.
#onpoli
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
Build a Canada worthy of the sacrifices those who came before us made. 🇨🇦
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
By their very definition, temporary residents are NOT permanent residents. They have entirely different impacts.
Carney’s immigration accounting is so creative, it should qualify for his own new artist tax exemption.
My latest for @nationalpost: nationalpost.com/opinion/sab…
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
We will remember them.
Today, Canada’s Fallen will be honoured and Remembered. Please join us in observing a moment of silence at 11:00 am to mark the sacrifice of those who have fallen in the service of their country.
#RemembranceDay #CanadaRemembers
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
Absolutely adore the poppy display along Bloor St here in #Toronto #LestWeForget
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
Somewhere along the way, our leaders forgot what immigration policy is supposed to accomplish.
Immigration policy cannot be about morals, charity or doing the “right thing” as the minister says.
Immigration policy needs to be about improving the lives of Canadians and improving Canada full stop. There can be no room for moralizing this anymore. In many cases, the “right thing” for the prospective migrant is not the “right thing” for the Canadian citizen. The collective interests of the Canadian people must be the priority above all else on immigration matters. This was understand for most of Canadian history.
The following quote from Minister Diab perfectly summarizes this new kind of thinking. “Also spouses and children, you know, families. We don’t want families to be separated. That is the right thing to do for Canada economically, but it’s the right thing to do.”
Everyone wants to be nice and do the right thing. But the federal government has a duty to do the right thing for Canadians above all else. I do not see how this is the right thing for Canadians.
Diab says immigration plan about predictability, doing the 'right thing' ctvnews.ca/canada/article/di…
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
“In Canada, we take care of each other”
By bringing in 950,000 non-Canadians in the country to compete against Canadians while we are:
- 500,000 homes short
- Down 53,000 jobs this year
- Facing 6.7% unemployment rate
- 13.8% youth unemployment rate
- 26.8 weeks treatment time
- 2.35 Million/M food bank use
The Prime Minister’s idea of taking care of eachother is very deceptive
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
Why didn’t Canada find them and deal with them first???? cbc.ca/news/canada/us-govern…
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
Canada added no private sector jobs from 2019 to 2024 — U.S. did the exact opposite nationalpost.com/news/canada…
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
58% of Canadians want less immigrants.
The unemployment rate is 6.7%.
Mark Carney’s solution?
700,000 immigrants for 2027.
#BREAKING: Canada’s unemployment rate edges up to six-month high in October
cp24.com/news/canada/2026/11…
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
As we all enjoy our endless, mindless, and difficult commute on the 401 tomorrow.
Crammed in next to endless 18 wheel tractor trailer drivers that have less driving skill and have had less sleep than your 16 year old. All while our gov't knows this, has known it for over a decade, and does nothing.
You know why.
Canada’s trucking industry racked by non-compliance, training and safety concerns
cp24.com/news/canada/2026/11…
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
Home invasions will continue to increase. A key factor is zero fear of consequences. Perps know a liberal judiciary will find a ‘social’ reason to excuse the inexcusable. In jail there is a chance for rehab. But walking free means more mayhem.
#BREAKING: Toronto police identify suspect in violent Bridle Path home invasion, say he was also shot
cp24.com/local/toronto/2026/…
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
Montreal Holocaust survivors came to the Senate pleading for action against antisemitism. We owe them our full resolve, not just words.
thesuburban.com/news/city_ne…
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
The biggest risk to Canada is losing our young people to areas that offer a future.
Info for Canadians Under 30
Combined ranking: median income after taxes:
1 Massachusetts $104,828
2 New Jersey $104,294
3 Maryland $102,905
4 Hawaii $100,745
5 California $100,149
6 New Hampshire $99,782
7 Washington $99,389
8 Colorado $97,113
9 Utah $96,658
10 Connecticut $96,049
11 Alaska $95,665
12 Virginia $92,090
13 Delaware $87,534
14 Minnesota $87,117
15 New York $85,820
16 Oregon $85,220
17 Rhode Island $83,504
18 Illinois $83,211
19 Vermont $82,730
20 Arizona $81,486
21 Idaho $81,166
22 Nevada $81,134
23 Georgia $79,991
24 Texas $79,721
25 North Dakota $77,871
26 Florida $77,735
27 Pennsylvania $77,545
28 Wisconsin $77,488
29 South Dakota $76,881
30 Maine $76,442
31 Nebraska $76,376
32 Wyoming $75,532
33 Kansas $75,514
34 Iowa $75,501
35 Montana $75,340
36 North Carolina $73,958
37 Michigan $72,389
38 South Carolina $72,350
39 Ohio $72,212
40 Tennessee $71,997
41 Indiana $71,959
42 Missouri $71,589
43 New Mexico $67,816
44 Alabama $66,659
45 Oklahoma $66,148
46 Kentucky $64,526
47 Arkansas $62,106
48 🇨🇦 Alberta $62,269
49 Louisiana $60,986
50 West Virginia $60,798
51 Mississippi $59,127
52 🇨🇦 Ontario $58,035
53 🇨🇦 British Columbia $55,334
54 🇨🇦 Saskatchewan $55,115
55 🇨🇦 Manitoba $52,560
56 🇨🇦 Quebec $50,224
57 🇨🇦 Newfoundland and Labrador $49,640
58 🇨🇦 Prince Edward Island $48,107
59 🇨🇦 New Brunswick $47,523
60 🇨🇦 Nova Scotia $46,866
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
I’ve increasingly come to worry about the rise of “judicial nihilism” (for lack of a better term) in Canada.
We have a justice system that spends enormous energy considering the personal circumstances of offenders, their rights, identities, mental health, and prospects for rehabilitation. Yet it seems unconcerned with the victims whose lives have been destroyed, or the public that must live with the consequences when dangerous individuals repeatedly reoffend.
I think we need to take judicial reform more seriously, rather than dismissing concerns about overreach and malfeasance as conservative fearmongering.
The more I look at recent cases (many highlighted by @sarkonakj) the more concerned I become that our institutions are losing sight of some basic moral values in justice.
I’ve been thinking about the
principles that should guide us to a more liberal, rules-based approach to criminal justice (I’ll admit that this is hardly new thinking, but I can’t remember the last time I’ve seen them laid out):
1. Justice should begin with victims, whose suffering should never become secondary to the circumstances of offenders.
2. Protecting the public from dangerous individuals must be a central responsibility of sentencing, and we should lean towards caution.
3. Punishment must be a meaningful deterrent and reflect the gravity of crimes. Some crimes warrant permanent imprisonment (if not capital punishment). Some crimes are so heinous that the mere prospect of rehabilitation should not be considered.
4. Repeat offenders should face dramatically greater consequences, including long-term incarceration or asylum to protect society. Nobody with dozens of separate criminal convictions should be roaming freely.
5. Mental illness should determine treatment and facility type, not reduce punishment. The bar for criminal non-responsibility should also be much higher than it is today.
6. Sentencing must apply to those convicted equally, based on actions and responsibility, not race, religion, cultural identity, immigration status etc. The rule of law should be non-discriminatory, the right time to address the “root causes” of crime and pursue social justice is before crime is committed.
7. Parliament needs to figure out how to reclaim its authority, with courts exercising much greater restraint in constitutional interpretations.
8. Judicial “independence” must be balanced with meaningful accountability for serious failures and overreach. The judiciary is not supreme to legislature.
I worry that too many political leaders have become uncomfortable defending the very concepts of order, punishment and personal responsibility, as though doing so is somehow incompatible with liberal moral values.
They aren’t.
A liberal democracy has two fundamental obligations. To protect people from the arbitrary exercise of government power, and to protect them from the violence and predation of others.
We cannot fulfill one by neglecting the other. They are together the necessary preconditions for liberty.
When the public sees rulings that seem fundamentally disconnected from shared expectations of right and wrong, it erodes trust in the system.
Order and public safety are necessary conditions for freedom.
The freedom to walk down the street, take public transit, operate a business or simply live peacefully in your own home means little if the government cannot protect you from disorder, violence and criminality. It’s often those with the fewest resources who suffer most when that protection fails.
If we want Canadians to have faith in the rule of law, they need to believe that it applies equally, that serious wrongdoing carries serious consequences, that dangerous people will not repeatedly be allowed to victimize others, and that the system will not be careless with the lives and suffering of victims.
“Arnold and Joanne De Jong were in their seventies when three men they had once hired to clean their gutters came back to their Abbotsford home in the middle of the night in May 2022 and murdered them. Arnold was suffocated, his head wrapped in duct tape. Joanne was beaten, and her throat was cut. The killers left with the couple’s cheques, credit cards, and a power washer. The trial judge found they planned to murder the De Jongs because they knew they would be recognized in the course of their robbery.
On Monday, the De Jongs’ daughters came to court expecting to watch those men receive justice in sentencing. Instead, they heard the judge declare that the law denying multiple murderers any chance at early parole violates the Charter’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. The cruelty, apparently, lies in making men who suffocated an old man with duct tape and bludgeoned his wife wait 25 years before asking to go free. Sentencing has been pushed to 2027.
Canadians settled this question a long time ago, and we settled it twice. A Liberal government in 1997 and a Conservative government in 2011, elected by different voters with different priorities, each concluded that people who kill more than once should be offered no early exit. That is what a free people does with its moral convictions: it argues about them, elects representatives who share them, and writes them into law. One judge has now informed Canadians that the answer they reached together, through two elected Parliaments, isn’t allowed.”
- - -
I don’t think there is any issue I’ve become more conservative on more than the sickness in our judicial system, even as I’ve become more left than I used to on economics/role of government.
It feels like several times a week there is another story that represents a deep miscarriage of justice, ill consideration for victims, or neglects society’s need for and equally applied rule of law or real punishment as a deterrence to crime. I fear there is not enough recourse to judges who reinterpret the constitution to ideological ends better left to the actual legislature.
This story honestly makes me sick and it saddens me that there are no practical accountability options for the judiciary in a case like this.
@stevestaley
thehub.ca/2026/10/21/how-can…
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
BREAKING -
Canada approved over 722,000 work permits in just the first 8 months of 2026.
Ottawa claims it's "fixing" immigration while still processing permits by the hundreds of thousands.
68,300 Canadians lost their jobs in September.
On Nov 3rd, they’re dropping the rule that you even have to try to hire a Canadian first.
The Prime Minister told us he’s taken control of immigration but all he’s done is manage the optics of it.
Credit to @KanwarSierah for the insights & data.
The judge argued that it is “cruel and unusual” punishment to block multiple murderers from applying for early parole.
Canada’s judiciary is a joke.
A BC Supreme Court judge says a section of the Criminal Code restricting multiple murderers from applying for early parole is unconstitutional, resulting in delayed sentencing for 3 men in the killing of an Abbotsford couple. #bcpoli #cdnpoli fraservalleytoday.ca/2026/10…
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
As we rise after a devastating tragedy at CFB Wainwright, Alberta, let's keep our military families and all affected in our hearts today and in the difficult days ahead. As 🇨🇦 mourns, we must remain strong and confident in the knowledge that no one stands alone under the sun.
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
Why are current Canadians not being welcomed into these positions ?? Unemployment is 6.5% this makes no sense
🇨🇦 Express Entry high-wage occupations list
• Comes into effect on November 3, 2026
• The list is currently based on data from 2023 to 2025.
For your immigration queries, contact us at:
🇨🇦+1 780 710 9635
To book an appointment please click on the below👇link>>>> calendly.com/mewiimmigration
Bradley Sutherland retweeted
We’re such a joke
#BREAKING: Ringleader of Toronto 18 terror plot no longer shows signs of extremism, granted full parole, board says cp24.com/local/toronto/2026/…








































