Bought some $VST today, looks like down side momentum lose, targeting 170-180.

comfy in this stuff. AMD hedged with nvda calls

Weekly open bear trap loading

I tried to warn yawl…

almost got shaken out for asecond, but @nellyeeee kept me grounded. got a runner left

I know this guy is just engagement baiting but he did something lots do that I dont like, where you use categories that are unhelpful analytically. you probably aren't trading "stocks" you are trading a specific sector, or more likely a specific stock that either is or isn't rate sensitive. "DUDE HAVE YOU LOOKED AT 'THE MARKET' " No I haven't and its a genuine question of mine to ask why would I? Most people fail at identifying the proper level of abstraction that will be relevant to their situation, focusing on "stocks" "bonds" and "the market" are all unhelpful levels of abstraction for the most part.

Burger typeshit

Im a little late but this would probably be my 9, might be missing one.

Current plan Step 1: take a break Step 2: lock in like never before. The reality is I’m only operating at a fraction of my potential currently and it’s very frustrating

Taking a week or two break from markets starting now. Gl friends

They are calling it the fakest premarket of all time

when the market is deeeep red it is important to scan your watchlist for the 1 thing you own thats still green so you can cope. With that said send $U higher why? why not

Getting my passion for physics back a bit, might have to take a small break from trading to dive back in.

Big pet peeve of mine is when SWEs/coders say stuff like “Ai doesn’t make coding faster it actually makes it slower!” No, you are just retarded. Most coders are analogous to construction workers who vastly overestimate their problem solving abilities.

not the type of endorsement you fade tbh. buying more meta

Taking some profits, but jobs not finished

someone posts a video "TOP!" someone says anything "TOP!" If your analysis is this fragile, you need HELP

I know this is just bait at this point but if you "run the calculations" and it tells you 2+2=5 the conclusion isn't "huh I guess 2+2=5 and not 4" its "wow my calculations were bad"

something I've been thinking about in regards to reasoning, and how we go about reasoning. The start of every problem is infinite, theres an infinite amount of lines to draw, infinite number of ema's you can choose from. so how do we pick, how do we reduce an infinite space to a finite one we can make sense of? One of the conclusions I've come to is the basis of the process is what you choose to ignore, the step 1 to any reasoning process is eliminating the infinitely many wrong answers so we can focus on the frame that actually produces value for us. TLDR: don't worry about finding the right answer but eliminating the wrong ones.