Buster🥩🥓🧈🍳

After World War II, and for many years after, Democrats and Republicans had a shared vision as to what America was/is: a sacred land, blessed by God, defending liberty and freedom, a shining city on a hill, all thanks to that miraculous document, the Constitution of the United States. We shared that vision. We only differed in how to achieve it. This was fully true into about the 1990s. No more. While Republicans have often lost their way, their desired end state remained that same vision of national excellence and freedom. The Democrats threw that vision away. They have welcomed into their ranks with open arms communists and jihadists. Their vision is one where America has always been intrinsically evil. They see the only way to fix this to be tearing down and throwing away America and the Constitution in favor of a "refounding" into a European-style morass of evil, globalist, unelected bureaucrats ruling as oligarchs, where national history is destroyed in favor of late-stage communist tyranny spiced up with pockets of jihad waiting to unleash a holy war. Vote red like your life depends upon it, because it does.

RE: Color Revolution Deniers @DataRepublican's Democracy Files are slowly but surely breaking X contain, which of course means that we are now seeing the usual suspects fulfilling the role of Color Revolution Deniers. Here's the thing. I have read all of their attempts at retorts. In my article below I lay out the textbook characteristics of the color revolutions the US waged in places like Ukraine and Georgia, and then I show empirical evidence that the exact same tactics are being employed by the same people on US soil. My arguments are founded solely in factual history, the plotters' own words and logic. Yet, every attempt by the Color Revolution Deniers to argue against what I wrote COMPLETELY FAILS TO ADDRESS the arguments I made and instead such articles deal solely in character assassination against DR and everyone else who has helped in getting the facts out there. Their unwillingness to address the stark and undeniable relationship between historical color revolution tactics and what we are seeing now before our very eyes seems almost an admission of guilt. Process that as you must.

(The post is a publicly-available inquiry to @jordangreennc of “RawStory dot com” in response to an opinion piece recently published by Mr. Green on such platform.) Hello Mr. Green: My name is Tom Anderson, and I am better known under my pseudonym “Cynical Publius” on X. I am writing with regards to the recent story published on “RawStory” under your byline, entitled “'Specter of menace': Pentagon-tied influencers vent of 'civil war' threat after midterms.” More specifically, I am working on an investigative article regarding the penchant of so-called “journalists” such as you to mislead their readers, and given the monstrous inaccuracies and omissions in your recent article, your tale is something of significant interest to my readers. With the above in mind, I have several questions I am hoping you will see fit to answer at your earliest opportunity: 1. In your recent RawStory article, you identified the fact that Ms. Jennica Pounds (“Data Republican” on X) has revealed a wide-ranging number of videos and audio tapes of former USAID and U.S. military employees plotting the creation of a “crisis of legitimacy” regarding President Trump and the upcoming midterm election. I myself published a widely-read article on X explaining how the tactics discussed on these tapes conform to the practices of “Color Revolutions” created by the U.S, government in Ukraine, Serbia, Georgia and other nations in the former Soviet bloc and former Yugoslavia. Your “article” criticized the motivations of me, Ms. Pounds and others in exposing such plot, while never once addressing the substance of such plot as revealed in the “Democracy Files” (as defined by Ms. Pounds) and my recent article entitled "The Color Revolution in Our Midst." Do you consider it an ethical journalistic practice to wholly ignore the findings of whistleblowers while engaging in character assassination of such whistleblowers? 2. In your X post announcing your RawStory “article,” you described me and others reporting on the Color Revolution plot as being members of a “Pentagon troll farm.” Given that it is a well-established fact of public record that neither me nor any of the other people you identified in your article publicly write or have ever publicly written at the behest or payment of the Pentagon, do you consider such libelous accusations to be an acceptable journalistic practice? 3. How did you obtain my personal phone number and the personal phone numbers/emails of the other persons referenced in your “article”? Did you illegally obtain such information in violation of the Privacy Act of 1974, and/or did you obtain such information from other “journalists,” such as Dan Lamothe of the Washington Post, who may have initially obtained such information illegally in violation of said Privacy Act? 4. In your “article,” you relied on a source from the Southern Poverty Law Center (“SPLC”) to attempt to discredit me and the other subjects of your article. As you solicited the SPLC’s opinion, did you first consider that the SPLC is currently the subject of a Department of Justice investigation regarding the SPLC’s alleged wire fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering? Did you consider the fact that the SPLC has allegedly funded the Ku Klux Klan as part of a fund-raising effort? Did these facts give you any pause whatsoever before you solicited or published the SPLC’s opinion? 5. The Color Revolutionaries documented in the Democracy Files speak openly and often of coordinating with Democrat governors to overthrow the Constitutionally-elected President of the United State of America. Did the seditionist nature of this on-the-record plot cause you any concern of any kind? 6. Have either you or RawStory received any cash or other consideration, directly or indirectly, from any of the NGOs or persons identified in the Democracy Files? 7. Have you been in direct contact with any of the persons or NGOs identified in the Democracy Files? Thank you in advance for your answers to these questions. My readers have significant concerns as to the integrity of “journalists” like you who practice under the protective umbrella of the Democrat/Media Complex while spreading falsehoods, half-truths and virulently false innuendo. You answers will hopefully shed light on this important issue. Please respond to these questions no later than 10 a.m. Eastern, November 1, 2026. Best regards, Tom Anderson

Bumping this to the top again in case you have not read it yet. A lot of things are going to happen in the days and weeks ahead. Knowledge is power.

This dirtbag journovermin Dilanian blocks me, so I have to go the screenshot route. He is actively assisting in the "Narrative" phase of a color revolution. To create the "crisis of legitimacy" that is necessary to attempt to justify the impending coup, it is imperative that in the days and weeks before the trigger event (i.e., the midterms) a constant narrative of illegitimate action by the sitting President be perpetrated by media outlets sympathetic to the color revolutionaries. That is all this is. There is literally zero actual evidence to support what he alleges. However, no evidence is necessary, just the message. These people are despicable human filth.