Options | Macro | Market Analysis & Options Talk @VolatilityCrew | 🇰🇷

Dreaming Garret
Joined July 2021
Pinned Tweet
$120,000
5
30
2,765
One of the talents I possess in life is intuition
1
671
🥰
2
14
867
We've entered an era where people with an overflow of ideas are in the spotlight. It has nothing to do with being good at school. Enjoy your era.
1
1
14
941
We live in an age where you can do anything you can imagine All you need are endless ideas
7
708
Made a great connection today Good day
1
9
789
Even claude code max20 can’t keep up with my overflowing ideas I burn through it in 1–2 days Sad
4
7
1,103
I need a $500 plan
177
decision time
2
1
8
2,190
If the 82K level holds there is a high probability that we will move toward 90K
2
7
1,397
BTC $10,000
5
1
20
2,112
wow just wow
Real life, baby
3
14
1,745
Sunday 5 PM – Tuesday 3 PM amodei please reset 😭
2
11
1,104
Hummmm Next 🏃‍➡️
1
11
1,445
My thoughts on the current market 1. I expected BTC to make one more push to the $88k–$90k range before declining. 2. NQ (Nasdaq) has set a new high, just as I anticipated. 3. At present, I am not thinking deeply about bond yields. 4. I anticipate a market correction in stocks sometime between this week and next. 5. I think BTC has entered the early stages of a bull cycle. While it is unclear whether it will rise further or begin to correct, I suspect that if a correction does occur, the magnitude could be greater than expected. 6. If BTC continues to hold above 82K, I do not consider the situation to be that bad. 7. I believe the mid-cycle phase of the AI ​​cycle is drawing to a close, and the broader asset market is likely entering the latter stage of its long-term boom cycle. Just my two cents. Good luck to everyone. NFA.
5
33
2,156
I’m a heavy user of Claude. I’m on the x20 ($200) plan and work with 10 to 20 sub-agents simultaneously. Weekly usage is usually completely used up in about 2 days. Even though I use it heavily, I feel like it lasts a very long time. I am satisfied. How is everyone using it?
8
17
2,655
I have been using Opus 5.5 continuously since its launch, and I am extremely satisfied with it. Hope everyone uses it and experiences these feelings. Opus 5.5 is the best model in the history of LLM.
6
1
8
1,426
My friend made this Really cool and beautiful
【Works】 I created BGA for "kakusan. - Chaigidel" by @kakusan_dtm for BOF 22. This is my first fully 3D BGA project. I put a lot of effort into it, so I hope you enjoy watching! 😊 Link : youtu.be/TPkoQDy9qag
2
880
Agree
Dusting off this tweet from April because this gap in shared understanding of LLM capability is *widening*. It's now less "two groups of people speaking past each other" and more a sharp funnel. - Napkin math somewhere around 6B people (~75% of the population) have barely come in contact with LLMs at all. - Around 1-2B (~20%) are casual and infrequent users of free-tier ChatGPT-like products. This group sees derpy chatbots and treats them a bit like a better Google search, a writing aid, or etc. Maybe an agent tries to book you a flight. I have non-tech friends who (reasonably, imo) say they have not much use for it at all. Even many professionals outside of math&code are in this tier. For example, execs and many other functions spend a lot of their time talking to other people, so while they understand what is happening intellectually, it is still second-hand and a bit abstract. - Now we get to professional use of frontier-grade LLMs in math&code. Somewhere around 20M people (0.2%) see first-hand that large, complex projects that used to take them weeks/months can now be completed by agents with a prompt. Building apps, copying apps, translating apps, decompiling apps from binaries... This has all happened very quickly and recently - less than 1 year ago, I was writing code manually by hand, typing memorized computer code commands into a code editor character by character, occasionally pressing Tab to autocomplete a little chunk of code. - And finally we get to the ~5,000 people (~0.00006%) with access to frontier-grade systems internally. The external world has seen the preview. It looks like swarms of thousands of agents collaborating over weeks on software mega projects: minting zero days, running cyber attacks and defenses at machine speeds, discovering new science, advancing the frontier of mathematics. Things that would have taken top professionals in the industry years of work. Meanwhile, human review and comprehension are starting to fall behind. For example, people are still involved in the "archeology" of the OpenAI-HF incident from many months ago. Mathematicians may be poring over the 722 manuscripts on frontier mathematics for a while. The funnel is driven by a combination of factors: 1. The impact scales with ambition, problem size, and horizon. A question with a paragraph answer barely stresses the system. You need a reservoir of big, difficult problems that you really care about. This aspect drives the consumer / professional dimension of the funnel. 2. The jaggedness of the system (which I have written about a lot separately). Capability peaks in domains that are digital, verifiable and economically valuable. This is because LLM capability emerges from reinforcement learning on verifiable rewards on a curated environment mixture driven by revenue potential. This aspect primarily drives the area (e.g. math&code) dimension of the funnel. 3. Access. Free-tier, paid-tier, internal. So this is the weirdness of the moment. The general public has mostly not interacted with these systems. When they have, it looks like a derpy chatbot. The majority of professionals still see only a modest uplift. And a small sliver of professionals are experiencing the vertigo of the curve going vertical. And it is all happening at the same time.
2
1,021
What are your thoughts on the market?
3
9
1,300