PulseChain risk intelligence · ethical research. Standing risk, live watches, Memory. Not an audit. Suggest reviews in post comments.

Joined July 2026
369 Guard retweeted
🚨 Something sketchy moved today? 369 Guard still remembers it next month PulseChain finally has a memory 👀 Meet @369Guard a public risk board that tracks what protocols are, what just moved on-chain, and what they've done in the past. Risk -> should you touch it? Live -> did something suspicious move? Memory -> don't let rugs, LP pulls or bad history disappear On-chain receipts. No paid scorecards. No fake "audit" stamp. 369guard.com/ #PulseChain $PLS $PLSX $HEX $INC $PRVX
1
5
2
13
1,509
369 Guard retweeted
⚠️ As PulseChain has been slowly grinding upwards, it looks like scammers are back on the scene. The same person that was launching daily honeypots a while ago has kicked back into action. Things to watch out for with these tokens: ⚠️ Basic honeypot trackers don't pick them up, they're using a more complex storage slot method to avoid basic trackers ⚠️ Sometimes have paid Dexscreener profiles, making them look legit ⚠️ Surprisingly 'good' charts despite never being shilled anywhere @PulseChainStats has a bot that will auto-flag these for you on launch, and I'm sure there are other tools out there that will identify them if you're considering buying tokens. A few recent examples: 0x0CEB9990d4E0bcF7f5Fc316A46285e82fEd7F4ff 0x7BCa54a2C89F57c3AbA2f157442c253e4f5465b2 Stay safe out there, and don't ape shitters without DYOR first.
13
30
2
193
7,013
this one is for all the little negative nancies out there. read carefully and try to understand: people LOVE to remind themselves that prices are down 95%-ish from all time highs (not only on PulseChain, but the vast majority of altcoins). no shit sherlock. this is the most negative frame possible. it gives the stupid assumption that people bought a single time at the all-time-high, and never bought again, and somehow sold the exact bottom to realize such a loss in reality, with our free will and agency, many folks lowered their average buy-in price (aka 'cost basis') by buying more as the price dipped. it's known as dollar-cost-average (DCA) strategy HEX erased 8 months of losses in 3 weeks. buys during the past 3-6 months would have put you near break-even or IN PROFIT today, although some chose to sell, complain, and trash talk their own investments instead 🤯 look at this simple math. if you somehow magically put in $1000 at the all time high, and $1000 at the all time low (not counting staking APY or forked copies), you'd be in profit by 106% TODAY. in other words, you'd have double your money. choose the better frame. optimism wins in the long term.
30
70
11
336
16,348
Can $HEX Make Another Bullish Move? Key Breakout Levels Revealed! 🔥🥳
1
11
2
98
1,235
Mark Cuban was a HEX holder once Is airdropping famous people good or bad? Leave your thoughts in the comments
Yes. Someone sent it to me.
20
40
1
329
9,113
🔥Internet Money (crypto wallet) growth is on fire! 🎉Total wallet downloads: 125,542 🍎iOS: 30,207 (+286) 🤖Android: 55,375 (+1,092) 🔵Chrome: 39,960 (+286) 💰Totaling 1,664 NEW downloads. 💰With an average of ~72 NEW downloads PER DAY, every day. 🙏 We are incredible thankful to every single person who has given Internet Money the opportunity to be their crypto wallet. To extend us the trust in building, secure, decentralized, open source technology. 💯 We would not be who or where we are today without our amazing community believing and supporting Internet Money throughout the years.
21
50
4
245
4,204
Some Bitcoin hacks are good for price, others not. I'll describe to you a secret mechanic to price. Jimmy Zhong hacked 51,680 BTC from the Silk road in 2012-2014 and held nearly all of them till 2021. Then the government got them and sold them. I think you can guess how the price is affected different from what is today billions of holding instead of billions of selling. If the marginal propensity to hold instead of dump is higher in hackers, alleged criminals, etc; than the original holders or governments, then that reduces supply and increases positive price pressure. This is why Donald Trumps work on this mission, like Executive Order 14233, is so awesome. Why should you, the innocent holder and enjoyer of technology be harmed because someone else did crime? Some holders: 2011 Mt Gox hacker 1feex still holds the orig 79,956 BTC, never moved. Ilya Lichtenstein & Heather Morgan hacked Bitfinex for 119,754 BTC and held 83% There's more examples, but you get the idea. Another dumper: Germany dumped 49,858 BTC in 2024 allegedly from the "Movie2k" seizure. TLDR; The $100M, so far, coldcard hack could reduce market BTC supply, or it could increase it. I've now explained to you a hidden mechanism which affects price.
92
235
10
1,408
53,401
369 Guard retweeted
Replying to @Cointelegraph
What actually happened 21:26:55 UTC — create tx 0x217c45c1… registers 24.15M USDC to 0x2f2974… Wait ~210s (dispute period = 200s) 21:30:25 — routine finalizer 0x5553… releases it So the finalizer looks like a normal release bot, not a stranger mint. Leading theory: hot validator quorum (or signing infra) approved a bad create; the tiny dispute window left almost no time to reject/pause. Crypto bug in sig checks remains an open lower-probability lane. Bridge was still unpaused at follow-up RPC.
1
188
🛑 ALERT - WordPress sites are under active attack. Attackers are exploiting the #wp2shell chain to gain unauthenticated RCE on vulnerable stock installations, with no plugins required. Public exploit code is now fueling mass scanning and web shell deployments. Read what defenders should check: thehackernews.com/2026/07/wo…
15
142
13
446
65,503