🤟🏻🤟🏻🤟🏻 @ambient_xyz

better models solve one problem. they also create new ones. serving them efficiently and making inference verifiable may be just as important as the models themselves. @ambient_xyz is building the infrastructure to solve both.

I think that's exactly how the media spins the news 😆

as many already know, @ambient_xyz is building infrastructure for verified AI inference, autonomous agents and an economy where AI systems can actually interact and make decisions onchain. but for any ecosystem like this to work at scale, it also needs markets, liquidity and tools for moving value around safely. this is where @getonyxnow becomes very important for Ambient. if explained simply, Onyx is the liquidity and market layer for PoW AI ecosystems. it helps solve one of the biggest problems early AI networks usually face: fragmented liquidity, weak price discovery, difficult access to tokens and almost no proper risk management tools. with Onyx, the Ambient ecosystem gets: >onchain token swaps >liquidity infrastructure >bridging between networks >future perps and hedging tools >cleaner and more accessible markets around AI assets and honestly, this is one of those pieces that many people underestimate. because AI ecosystems cannot fully function only around models and inference. if agents, miners, users and protocols are going to interact economically, there must also be a strong market layer underneath them. and that’s exactly the direction this integration is moving toward.

gm cx i don’t really understand what’s going on epstein, wars, constant narratives every day what does crypto have to do with all of this? and why is it taking the hit? because for now, it still gives us some level of freedom but in the future, that’s not guaranteed

i’ll be honest x (formerly twitter) is trying to crap in my ears my feed looks like a public toilet, i hope one day i’ll start seeing useful information here again nikita and elon are doing something wrong

is today’s payment infrastructure actually built for ai agents? @PiSquared recently published an article “AI Agents Don’t Click ‘Pay Now’” and it clearly shows where the real problems start most payment systems were designed for humans when there is an explicit action a confirmation context and a pause before paying for a human this is fine for an ai agent - it isn’t an agent executes a task end to end and payment for it is just one step in the process no pauses no second checks as long as the system allows it so the real question isn’t whether ai agents can make payments but whether the infrastructure itself is ready for this scenario especially when it comes to frequent and small payments between services agents or inside automated workflows the pi article explains well why simply “giving access to a pay button” is not enough you need clear limits explicit rules and programmable logic that defines what an agent can do with money and within which boundaries from this perspective, their architecture makes sense it assumes from the start that the participant of the system may not be a human but software with predefined permissions no intuition no emotions only rules i recommend reading the article itself it helps clarify why agent payments are not an abstraction but a very real and practical problem already today

something new

gm cx. how are you doing emotionally and physically these days? maybe your feed looks different, but mine has turned into pure trash. epstein, binance, endless noise and accusations. is it the same for you? i have a strong feeling that all this noise is being fed to us on purpose. there are no right or left sides here. the goal is simple. to throw dust in our eyes. while you’re wiping your eyes, someone else is calmly doing their thing. i don’t fully understand what exactly they’re doing, but i’m convinced it’s happening. in times like this, i think it’s more important not to polish cz’s glasses from hate or dive deep into epstein documents, but to stay grounded. to look for ideas, strategies, ways to earn and survive in this market. opportunities exist. the @Polymarket market alone is full of speculation where you can make money, but if you’re not using your head, you can lose it just as fast. and maybe during such dumb periods the best decision is to step away from the screen and spend time with your family, with people close to you. sometimes that’s the most rational choice. at the same time, there’s still a simple, naive, but important idea living inside me. a world without borders, without skin color, without passports and papers. a world where crypto is a choice, not a permission. where we don’t constantly run into politics, bans, and attempts to kill anonymity and decentralization. every cryptocurrency should be a personal choice. if someone chooses tornado cash, dash, monero, zcash, that’s their right. without fear of consequences or persecution. peace for the whole world is the baseline. maybe these are just my wet dreams. but as one Russian entrepreneur once said: «мне похуй юра, я так чувствую». i’m not chasing popularity. i’m trying to find people who feel the same way. and honestly, i don’t really care about x anymore. they took away my blue subscription a month or two after i paid for it. no email replied, no support account answered. i bought premium, got hit with artificial engagement, and now, judging by my before and after activity, i’m sitting in a shadowban. that’s the time we’re in. that’s the market. that’s the internet. curious who else feels it the same way.

scrolling through x , as usual. news about AI, constant “breakthroughs”, talks about AGI. at the same time, more and more discussions about the problems of centralized AI and the idea that model outputs should actually be verifiable. this narrative is showing up more often. and over time, you start to understand why. when AI influences decisions, money, processes, and people, trusting results purely “on faith” starts to feel strange and risky. for a long time, even for me, this stayed at the level of stereotypes. closed models work this way, that’s just how it is. if a big company says so, then it must be true. and only through the @ambient_xyz account did I really start to see the root of the problem with closed models. not through loud slogans, but through calm, honest posts that actually break things down. before that, the picture felt fragmented. now it feels coherent. it’s clear there’s an idea-driven team behind ambient. people who aren’t just building a product, but are digging deeply into the core problem of our time and the near future. and ambient exists specifically to address that. in short: ambient is an AI network where the answer itself isn’t enough. what matters is the ability to verify how the model arrived at it. not trust by default, but a verifiable process. the project is currently running a public testnet, and you can already see how this works in practice. i’d recommend simply keeping an eye on ambient and reading their posts. they talk openly about issues many others prefer to ignore, and they do it calmly and without noise.