0xher

A note on the Polymarket positions you've seen on-chain - the account named "P2P Team" is ours. We wanted to come out honestly. The capital came from our foundation account and all proceeds return to it. Here's the full picture. 10 days before our raise went live, we placed bets that we'd hit our $6M+ target. At that point we had one oral commitment from Multicoin ($3M) - no signed term sheets, no guaranteed allocations, nothing binding. We were betting on ourselves. We'd told the market we were raising over $6M. We believed we could. That bet was our way of backing our word with our own money at a moment when the outcome was genuinely uncertain. Over the following 10 days we made our case, secured commitments, and the raise closed at $5.2M - entirely from outside investors we don't control. We understand why this raises questions. Trading on an outcome you can influence erodes trust. We don't believe we were trading on a done deal, but we recognize reasonable people can see it differently. We named the account "P2P Team" deliberately - to give a marketing signal of our presence to the community and reflect our intent to be transparent. But intent isn't the same as action. Not disclosing at the time was a mistake we own. We took time to study the legal implications before speaking, which is why we stayed silent until now with a "No Comments" stance! - that too is a fair criticism. All proceeds go back into our futarchy-governed MetaDAO treasury. We will be liquidating all positions in the next few hours and are putting together a formal company policy on prediction market trading going forward. One thing we want to be unambiguous about: MetaDAO (@MetaDAOProject ) had zero knowledge of or involvement in these bets. We're genuinely excited to join this community and wanted to start on the right note - which means being straight with you about this.

NEW: Major investigation dropping February 26 on one of crypto’s most profitable businesses where multiple employees abused internal data to insider trade over a prolonged period of time.

A new proposal is live in the Fluid governance forum: Establish Fluid Foundation. This proposal covers changes that move Fluid Protocol and its IP rights toward full community ownership and long-term sustainability.

Tomorrow we're increasing the network's minimum base fee from 2M to 5M wei to improve network health, stability, and user experience while staying cheap relative to steady-state fees. This improves three core areas: • Better Performance via faster transaction inclusion during traffic spikes • Price Stability from a more predictable surge pricing model where fees stay at a consistent floor during normal hours and scale during peaks. • Network Integrity to protect the chain from low-value bloat and spam Updates will be posted on our status page status.base.org/

🚨Claude Opus 4.6 wrote vulnerable code, leading to a smart contract exploit with $1.78M loss cbETH asset's price was set to $1.12 instead of ~$2,200. The PRs of the project show commits were co-authored by Claude - Is this the first hack of vibe-coded Solidity code?

ASSET MANAGER APOLLO, WHICH MANAGES $900B, ENTERS AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE UP TO 90M MORPHO OVER 4 YEAR PERIOD; WILL WORK TOGETHER FOR ONCHAIN LENDING: BLOG

🚨 UPDATE: Meteora, Jupiter and Uniswap led all DeFi protocols in 2025 by fee revenue, each generating over $1 billion for the year.

The recent DAO alignment proposal has been moved to Snapshot after extensive discussion. We realize the community is very interested in a path forward and is ready to make a decision. Time for tokenholders to weigh in and vote. snapshot.org/#/s:aavedao.eth…

Since launching SVR on Aave, $8.2M has already flowed to @aave and @chainlink. → $5.3M for Aave → $2.8M for Chainlink Both win. Best duo in DeFi.