tenzo retweeted
I let Grok Bot scan 9,491 Solana pairs with $53 on the line. it bought 262 of them, and 24 hours later the wallet was at $7,429.
by the end, one +33% trade was paying 27 times what I started with.
Grok set up six agents, each hunting entries its own way, all feeding one leaderboard. in front of every buy sits a filter funnel: liquidity, LP lock, how much the dev holds, who else is holding. miss any of it and the pair never gets bought. a combo multiplier climbs with every win in a row, and the first loss resets it.
259 trades, 215 green.
the big closes, with the wallet growing under each one:
> 01:35, SILKZ +$50, +52% on the wallet
> 03:21, LUNEX +$104
> 04:49, AMETH +$140
> 09:34, NEBUL +$120
> 11:20, PLUMY +$234
> 15:08, HALOX +$825
> 17:35, AURRA +$640
> 19:13, HAZEY +$1,446, +33% on a $4,300+ wallet
the part I keep coming back to is that last line.
+33% isn’t a crazy trade. on day one, on $53, it would have been under $18. by 19:13 the small stuff had been feeding the balance all day, so the same kind of move paid $1,446.
a couple hundred small closes did that feeding, $3,810 between them, a bit more than all eight big closes made.
and it skipped almost everything. only 1,085 of those pairs even got past the filters, and it still passed on most of them. 44 losses all day, and every one of them reset the combo.
most of us chase the one coin that does 1,000%. this run never needed one. its best trade by percent was the very first, and it paid $50.
$53 to $7,429 didn’t need a moonshot. it needed a filter that said no 97% of the time and a wallet that kept growing under every yes.
$57 → $9,923, 174X IN 20 HOURS. MY GROK BOT’S 258% TRADE STILL FINISHED THIRD
The trade that took first place made 55%.
Most people rank trades by percent. It’s the number that ends up on the screenshot.
My bot’s TOP CLOSES board ranks them by dollars, and on that board the order looks nothing like the percent column. It trades perps both ways on DOGE, AVAX, SOL, BCH and BTC, with a fixed TP on every position and 13x to 30x depending on the setup. Big setups get about half the current stack.
Results of this paper run, the five big closes:
- DOGE long at 13x, 109% on margin, +$40
- AVAX long at 25x, 232%, +$197
- SOL long at 30x, 258%, +$623
- BCH long at 29x, 229%, +$1,727
- BTC short at 14x, 55%, +$1,752
Read it top to bottom. The return peaks in the middle and falls off a cliff at the end. The dollars only go up.
BCH sat at #1 on the board for almost five hours. Then at 17:25 a BTC short with the lowest return of the five closed and took first place by $25.
The percent tells you how good the setup was. The dollars tell you how big the stack was when it showed up. By 17:25 the stack was roughly four times what it was when BCH closed, so 55% on the bigger base beat 229% on the smaller one.
The stack grew in between. Small closes netted $5,525, more than the five big ones combined, with a best streak of 22 wins in a row. 29 losing trades cost $291 for the whole session, less than half of what the SOL long paid.
30x on SOL and 29x on BCH are this desk’s numbers, not a recommendation for anyone’s account.
Hour 20. $9,923 on the account, and the trade sitting at #1 on the board is the one with the smallest percent.
I GAVE MY GROK BOT $54 AND ONE RULE: HALF THE STACK ON EVERY BIG SETUP. 20 HOURS LATER: $6,382
118x. The 13x trade paid more than the 30x one.
Most people think leverage is what makes the money. Turn it up, the payout goes up.
My bot sizes the margin instead. About half of whatever the stack is right now goes into a big setup, and the leverage just fits the setup, 13x to 30x. It trades BNB, LINK, ATOM, ETH and XLM whichever way each one is moving, with a fixed TP on every position.
Results of this test run, the five big closes:
- BNB long at 13x, coin moved about 5.2%, 68% on margin
- LINK short at 18x, about 6.5%, 118%
- ATOM short at 22x, about 8.0%, 178%
- ETH long at 30x, about 6.0%, 182%
- XLM short at 13x, about 8.6%, 112%
Read it top to bottom and leverage looks like the whole story. ETH at 30x had the best return of the day. Now add the dollars.
ETH paid $967. XLM, at 13x and 112%, paid $1,474. By the time XLM opened, the stack under it was more than twice what it was when ETH closed, and half of a bigger stack beats a better return.
So leverage sets the return, the stack sets the payout. The TP is fixed before entry, and every big position closes in one piece when it gets there.
The first big close, BNB, paid $20 on about $29 of margin. The last one ran on about $1,316. The small trades in between netted $3,544 and did most of that growing. 37 losing trades cost $446 combined, less than half of what the ETH long paid on its own.
30x on ETH with half the stack behind it is a setting for this desk, not for your account.
Hour 20. $6,382 on the account, and the next big setup gets half of it, whatever leverage the chart asks for.
tenzo retweeted
I gave Grok Bot $47 and asked for one thing, trade Solana memecoins. an hour in, a single trade had added 78% to the wallet. 24 hours in, it was at $7,583.
by the end, one +19% trade was paying 21 times what I started with.
Grok split the work between six agents taking turns, with a filter stack in front of every entry. unlocked liquidity or a dev sitting on more than ~10% of the tokens, and the pair never gets bought. a combo multiplier grows on a win streak and resets on a loss. whales are something it watches.
283 trades, 237 green.
the big closes, with the wallet growing under each one:
> 01:07, GLAZE +$57, +78% on the wallet
> 02:50, MOSAI +$63
> 06:46, ADOBE +$105
> 07:57, BRICK +$184
> 14:01, RUSTY +$258
> 16:23, SIENA +$1,400, the biggest of the day
> 18:53, KILNO +$684
> 20:36, UMBRA +$1,015, +19% on a $5,300+ wallet
the part I keep coming back to is that last line.
+19% isn’t a crazy trade. on day one, on $47, it would have been under $9. by 20:36 the small stuff had been feeding the balance all day, so the same kind of move paid $1,015.
a couple hundred small closes did that feeding, $3,766 between them, almost exactly what all eight big closes made.
the streaks didn’t last forever. the combo topped out at x4 and reset after every one of the 46 losses, and the balance kept climbing anyway.
most of us chase the one coin that does 1,000%. this run never needed one. its best trade by percent was the very first.
$47 to $7,583 didn’t need a moonshot. it needed a wallet that kept growing under every trade.
tenzo retweeted
I let Grok Bot trade Solana memecoins with $67 for 24 hours. it never had more than about a fifth of the balance in play, and still finished at $6,382.
95x off bets most people would call too small to matter.
it was a test run. six agents take turns, and before anything gets bought, liquidity has to be locked, the dev can’t hold more than ~10% of the tokens, and the pool needs real money in it. anything else gets skipped. it also keeps an eye on whale entries.
224 wins, 45 losses.
the big closes:
> 01:42, SCORC +$39
> 04:31, VANTA +$85
> 06:39, NOIRE +$116
> 09:48, INKED +$500, nearly +75% on the balance
> 11:58, OBSID +$304
> 13:42, CHARX +$524
> 18:14, MOLTN +$963, the biggest of the day
> 20:37, BLAZR +$922
what actually got me is how small every one of those started.
it holds three positions at a time, 3-7% of the balance each. so even with everything open, that’s about a fifth at most, and the rest just sits there.
that’s why a bad hour doesn’t hurt much. and there were bad hours, some of them closed red. the losses stayed small and got made back fast.
most of us go all in on the one chart we’re sure about.
45% of the profit came from those small positions closing at +5-20%. and the size still compounds. INKED did nearly +75% and paid $500. BLAZR did +17% and paid $922, because by then the balance was about 8x bigger.
$67 to $6,382 didn’t need the whole stack. it never even used most of it.
I GAVE MY GROK BOT $75 AND ONE RULE: ONLY THE LEVERAGE THE SETUP ASKS FOR. 22 HOURS LATER: $2,938
On other runs that meant 25x or 30x. This time it never went above 18x.
Most people decide on leverage before they’ve even seen the chart. Same number on every trade, whatever the trade looks like.
Same bot, different five: XRP, DOT, TRX, LTC and UNI. It trades whichever way each coin is moving, and every position gets a fixed TP. Strong setups get about half the stack, everything else is small, quick closes.
Results of this paper run, the five big closes:
- TRX long at 17x, 79% on margin, +$37
- UNI short at 14x, 103%, +$80
- DOT short at 11x, 92%, +$166
- XRP long at 15x, 81%, +$303
- LTC long at 18x, 102%, +$727
The setups didn’t call for 25x or 30x, so the bot didn’t take it. Lower leverage meant smaller returns per trade, 79% to 103% on margin. The stack still grew the same way, though, and every big close paid more than the one before it.
The red side was the quietest part of the day. 30 losing trades, and the whole pile cost $79. About $2.60 apiece.
18x with half the stack is still a lot of leverage. Read this as a log, not a plan for your money.
Hour 22. $2,938, 39 times the morning, and the highest leverage all day was 18x. Nothing asked for more.
A GUY GAVE HIS GROK BOT 5 AGENTS AND $97 TO PLAY CASINO GAMES. 5 DAYS LATER: $10,097
He showed me the proof. Five days, five green days, and a different agent landed the biggest hit every time.
His setup: five agents, REXO, MILO, IVY, FAYE and BRUNO, each with its own specialty, all playing in parallel around the clock. Every win went straight back in, so each day they played more sessions than the day before, 31 on day one, 47 on day five.
I asked my Grok bot to rebuild his run as a terminal so you can see how it played out. It’s a demonstration, not his live screen.
- Day 1: +$1,534, biggest hit by IVY
- Day 2: +$1,673, biggest hit by REXO
- Day 3: +$1,969, biggest hit by MILO
- Day 4: +$2,264, biggest hit by FAYE
- Day 5: +$2,560, biggest hit by BRUNO
Every day, one big win made 30-40% of that day’s profit. None of the five agents ended up with more than 23% of the total.
The first big win added 84% to his balance. The last one added 11%, even though it was the bigger number in dollars.
Day 5. $10,097 from $97. The best week of his life.
It all happened on duelbet.com/c/5cau7y
Now the honest part. He got lucky, and not once, five days in a row. Casino games are built so the house wins over time, and no bot or agent changes that. Nothing here says his next five days go the same way, and it says even less about how yours would go. This isn’t a setup to copy. If you play, play only with money you can afford to lose.
🤝 Paid partnership
tenzo retweeted
I started Grok Bot with $74. 24 hours later it was at $5,892, and the last 8 hours didn’t have a single big trade.
they still added $800+.
this was a 24-hour test run on Solana memecoins. six agents take turns scanning fresh pairs. a thin pool, unlocked liquidity, a dev holding more than ~10% of the tokens, any of those and it’s a skip. it also tracks whale entries and follows them in.
194 wins, 38 losses.
the big closes:
> 01:44, CAMLO +$318, +111% on the balance in one trade
> 04:11, DUNEX +$442
> 07:18, SPIKY +$591
> 11:07, DATEZ +$791
> 15:55, SANDY +$1,054, the biggest of the day, and the last
the part I keep coming back to is everything after that last line.
no more big closes. just small sells nobody notices, for the rest of the session, and they kept adding up.
that’s the same stuff that made 45% of the whole day’s profit. the big closes get the screenshots, the routine pays the rent. and the big ones only got that big because the routine had been growing the balance under them all day.
most of us check out after the big win. close the app, call it a day, or start forcing the next one.
$74 to $5,892 didn’t end with a bang. it ended with 8 quiet hours that still paid.
tenzo retweeted
I gave Grok Bot $64 and a simple job, trade Solana memecoins. 24 hours later the balance was at $6,143.
96x. and it worked through 6,000+ tasks to close just 290 trades.
this was a 24-hour test run. Grok set up six agents that take turns scanning fresh pairs. a pool needs serious liquidity in it, that liquidity has to be locked, and the dev can’t hold more than ~10% of the tokens. anything else gets skipped. it also watches for whale entries and goes in after them.
211 wins, 41 losses.
the big closes:
> 01:37, MOSSY +$321, +135% on the balance in one trade
> 03:59, VOLTA +$474
> 06:58, ZAPPO +$635
> 10:52, SLIME +$828
> 15:40, GECKO +$1,083, the biggest of the day
what actually got me is the gap between two numbers, 6,000+ and 290.
that’s about 20 tasks for every trade it actually closed. scanning fresh pairs, checking the pool, the lock, the dev wallet, watching the whales. a lot of that work ends in a skip, and a skip never touches the balance.
most of us flip that ratio. one look at a chart, one click, done.
the trades it did take were mostly boring too. 45% of the profit came from small sells of $10-250 that nobody would ever notice. the big closes kept growing in dollars because each one was sized off a balance the small stuff had already built.
$64 to $6,143 isn’t 290 good trades. it’s 6,000+ tasks deciding which 290 were worth taking.
BEING WRONG 33 TIMES COST MY GROK BOT $93. BEING RIGHT TURNED $59 INTO $3,213
Paper run, 22 hours. All 33 losses together cost less than the single BCH long paid.
Most people don’t lose a day on bad trades. They lose it on one bad trade they refused to close.
Grok built a perps bot that trades both ways on BCH, XLM, BNB, ETH and AVAX. It goes with the move, every position gets a fixed TP, and leverage runs 10x to 23x depending on the setup. Big setups get about half the balance, and in between it runs small, fast closes.
- XLM short at 10x, 83% on margin, +$30
- ETH long at 16x, 76%, +$62
- BCH long at 16x, 90%, +$153
- AVAX long at 11x, 83%, +$312
- BNB short at 23x, 98%, +$891
Now put the red side next to that. 33 losses, $93 for the whole session, under $3 each on average. The BNB short alone paid almost ten times what all of them cost.
That’s the part that matters. A loss here never gets the chance to become a story. The average win was 2.8% of the stack, the average loss 0.5%, and the bot closes a bad trade before it can grow.
The returns barely moved, 76% to 98%. The dollars grew from $30 to $891 because each trade was sized off a bigger balance.
23x with half the balance in the trade is how this desk is set, not a template for anyone.
Hour 22. $3,213, and a whole day of being wrong still adds up to $93.
MY GROK BOT TURNED $50 INTO $4,328 IN A TEST RUN WITH A 90% WIN RATE. THE MATH SAYS IT WOULD STILL BE GREEN AT 50%
22 hours. The win rate is the least interesting number in it.
Everyone chases win rate. 90% sounds like the whole story. It isn’t. The average win was 3.2% of the balance, the average loss 0.6%. At those sizes the bot could lose every other trade and still finish up.
I had Grok build a perps bot that trades both ways on XRP, DOGE, LINK, UNI and ATOM. It waits for the candles to confirm direction, sets the take-profit before entry and exits exactly there. Leverage runs 8x to 19x depending on how far price has to go, and a strong signal gets about half the balance.
The five big closes, all at their TP:
- XRP short at 19x, 1.3687 → 1.2948, 99% on margin
- UNI short at 14x, 7.685 → 7.132, 97%
- LINK short at 19x, 12.832 → 11.985, 121%
- ATOM long at 17x, 1.5690 → 1.6961, 133%
- DOGE short at 13x, 0.08715 → 0.07948, 110%
That’s where the asymmetry comes from. On the big trades the upside was fixed before entry. On the small ones a hard stop fixed the downside. 18 losing trades all session, and every one of them was small.
Take DOGE. 0.08715 down to 0.07948 is an 8.8% drop. At 13x that’s about 114% gross, 110% after costs, and on the balance it had by then it paid $1,254.
This ran on real Kraken prices but not on a live account, so it doesn’t prove what real trading would return. And 13x to 19x on half the balance is a serious liquidation risk with real money.
Hour 22. $4,328 on the test balance, and the number I’d actually watch with real money isn’t the 90%. It’s 3.2 against 0.6.
tenzo retweeted
I told Grok Bot to build a memecoin team that pays for its own subscription and doesn’t need me watching. 24 hours later it had turned $58 into $6,483.
the $49 was covered by 1:31am.
this was a 24-hour test run on Solana. Grok came back with six agents taking turns, each with its own zone and its own size limit. pairs with thin LP get ignored. a dev holding more than 7% of supply is a skip, and the LP has to be locked for at least a month. a whale coming in with 300+ SOL is worth a look, but only after the risk check.
the subscription line on the screen just reads $0.00, because the bot pays it out of profit.
235 wins, 46 losses.
the big trades:
> 01:31, SILKO +$348, took the balance from $241 to $589
> 03:39, MAUVE +$483
> 06:33, CREMA +$688
> 10:26, SATIN +$913
> 15:18, PRISM +$1,100, the biggest of the session
what actually got me is the other number on that screen.
it had a $7,000 daily target, and it finished at 92%. the target is only there to show progress, the bot isn’t built to chase it, so the last 8% just stayed open.
that’s where most of us blow up. we set a number for the day, fall a little short, and start forcing trades to hit it.
46 losses all day, all of them small. every token it skipped for a fat dev wallet is a loss that never happened.
$58 to $6,483 didn’t come from chasing the target. it came from a bot that paid its own bill by 1:31am and never chased the rest.
MY GROK BOT TURNED $54 INTO $5,392. THAT’S $8 SHORT OF 100X, AND IT DIDN’T CARE
Every big position closed right at a take-profit it set before entering. Not a cent past it.
A person sitting at $5,392 takes one more trade just to see 100x on the screen. That’s usually how a great day turns into a bad one.
I had Grok build a perps bot that goes long and short and picks its own leverage. New coins again: BTC, ADA, DOT, TRX and LTC. One rule sits above the rest, nothing gets held on a maybe.
- Waits for the candles to confirm direction before it enters
- Sets the TP before the position opens
- Picks leverage, 8x to 30x, from the distance to that TP
- Puts about half the balance in when the signal is strong
- Takes small trades fast and cuts them faster
That second rule is the one that made the day. Five big positions over 22 hours, three shorts and two longs, each one closed exactly at target for 106% to 138% on margin. None of them hung around for a bigger move.
Take ADA. 0.2439 down to 0.2249 is a 7.8% drop. At 18x that’s about 140% gross, 135% after costs, and on the balance it had by then it paid $1,491.
The small trades kept the base growing in between. Average win 3.6% of the balance, average loss 0.6%, six to one. 154 wins, 27 losses all session.
30x on BTC and 25x on TRX are my own settings, not a setup to mirror.
Hour 22. $5,392 on the balance, $8 under 100x, and the bot still won’t move a TP for a round number.
tenzo retweeted
I gave Grok Bot $49. 24 hours later the balance was at $7,583, and it had blocked 40 rugs on the way.
I asked it to count those too, not just the money.
Grok built six agents for Solana memecoins, each with its own sector and its own size limit, and every one of them has to get through the same shield before an entry. dev holding over 15% of supply, blocked. liquidity not locked, blocked. mint authority still live, blocked. honeypot, blocked. a whale coming in with 200+ SOL only gets a second look if the token already made it past all of that.
222 wins, 44 losses.
the big closes:
> 01:52, EMBR +$406, more than doubled the balance
> 05:02, KILN +$600
> 08:32, TORCH +$774
> 12:51, CINDR +$1,052
> 17:29, SOLAR +$1,309, the biggest of the day
the number I keep looking at isn’t on that list though. it’s 40.
40 tokens it walked away from. it made zero on every one of them, and that’s exactly the point. any one could have taken a chunk of the stack, and a honeypot doesn’t care how good your entry was.
most of us only count wins. nobody screenshots the coin they didn’t buy.
the rest is what you’d expect by now. almost half the profit came from a couple hundred small fills, and by evening the balance was about 16x what it was at the first big close. same kind of trade, $1,309 instead of $406.
$49 to $7,583 didn’t come from catching the rocket. it came from walking away from 40 rugs.
tenzo retweeted
I gave Grok Bot $49 and asked for a team instead of a bot. 24 hours later the balance was at $5,392.
and the part I didn’t expect only kicks in after 12 wins in a row.
Grok built six agents for Solana memecoins, each hunting its own setups in its own sector with its own size limit, all running through one shared risk filter. pairs below the liquidity bar don’t even get looked at. the LP has to be locked, and a dev holding more than ~15% of supply means skipped, no exceptions. a whale coming in with 250+ SOL is a reason to look closer.
216 wins, 43 losses.
the big closes:
> 02:01, TITAN +$283, doubled the balance in one trade
> 05:05, FORGE +$404
> 08:35, CHROMA +$552
> 12:53, GLINT +$730
> 17:28, RIVET +$968, the fattest of the session
what actually got me is the combo system.
every 12 wins in a row bumps it up a level, and the higher the combo, the bigger it sizes. one loss and it’s back to the start.
so it only bets bigger after it’s already been proven right, and the moment it’s wrong, it shrinks back down.
that’s the opposite of how most of us trade memecoins. we size up after a loss to win it back.
43 losses all session, and every one of them reset the combo, so the next trade went back to normal size. it closed the day on x6, the max.
the rest was routine. almost half the profit came from small fills, $1-150 each, and that’s the balance the big closes were sized off.
$49 to $5,392 didn’t come from betting big. it came from betting bigger only while it was right.
I GAVE MY GROK BOT $51 AND ONE RULE: DON’T ENTER UNTIL THE CANDLES AGREE. 18 HOURS LATER: $4,859
95x. Every entry and exit price is below, check them on any chart.
Most people enter on the first candle that moves, then find out it was a fake. My bot waits for a few more to confirm the direction, and only then opens.
Grok built it for perps on a different set this time: XRP, DOGE, BNB, LINK and LTC. It trades both ways, picks long or short off the move, and sizes leverage from 8x to 25x by how far price can travel. Small trades get closed fast. When the signal is strong, about half the balance goes in.
The five big closes:
- 02:02, BNB short at 25x, 751.15 → 719.60, 101% on margin
- 05:09, LINK short at 15x, 12.921 → 12.004, 103%
- 08:27, DOGE short at 14x, 0.09005 → 0.08231, 116%
- 11:56, XRP long at 17x, 1.2352 → 1.3142, 105%
- 15:21, LTC short at 21x, 61.41 → 58.16, 107%
That’s what waiting buys. The bot is late to every move on purpose, and it still caught between 4.2% and 8.6% on each one.
Take LTC. 61.41 to 58.16 is a 5.3% drop. At 21x that’s about 111% gross, 107% net, and on the balance it had by then it paid $1,241.
The only long was XRP, when it turned up around noon. The rest were shorts, because that’s where the candles were pointing.
37 losing trades over the session, all small. None of them knocked the balance back.
25x on BNB and 21x on LTC are what this desk runs, not a plan for anyone else’s account.
Hour 18. $4,859 on the balance, and the next trade still won’t open until the candles agree.
HE TRADED $105K IN A MONTH AND MADE $513K ON IT. MY GROK BOT FOUND HIM ON FOMO, PLUS 3 OTHERS
Several of today’s top 5 didn’t make the cut. They’re down millions on the month.
Most people copy whoever is #1 today. That’s how you end up buying into someone’s worst week.
So this time Grok Bot didn’t trade at all. It scanned the whole FOMO leaderboard with one hard filter, no one-day stars. A trader had to be green on the day, the week, the month and all time, all at once, with a wallet verified onchain so anyone can open it and check.
Four names made it. Then the bot ran the math on $100 behind each of them on copyfomo a month ago. It’s a rough estimate from 30-day PnL per dollar traded, not a replay of every trade:
- donnydicey: $100 → about $589
- hifive_07: $100 → about $327
- 22222222: $100 → about $225
- escobarpablo: $100 → about $206
copyfomo: t.me/copyfomo_bot?start=ref_…
donnydicey is the guy from the top. Of the four, he makes the most on each dollar he puts in. That’s the only number that matters when you copy, because you copy the return, not the size of someone’s wallet.
A verified wallet beats a pretty screenshot too. All four are onchain, open them yourself.
One catch. None of the four has traded in the last 8 to 21 days. Before copying anyone, check they’re still active.
Data from fomofamily leaderboard via provadata site, snapshot Oct 14
This is a filter, not a pick. Nobody here is a signal to follow.
Four names out of the whole leaderboard. That’s how rare green in every window actually is.
tenzo retweeted
I asked Grok Bot which traders on FOMO are actually worth copying. only 4 made it through. on paper, $100 on each of them a month ago would be $1,347 today.
and all I’d have had to do was press copy.
it went through the whole FOMO leaderboard with filters that don’t forgive much. green on every window, 24 hours, 7 days, 30 days and all time, one red window and the trader’s out. a verified wallet with every trade on chain. 70+ trades in the month, so nobody gets in on one lucky token. then it ranks whoever’s left by profit per dollar traded, not by total PnL.
what $100 on each would have turned into over 30 days:
> donnydicey, $100 to $589
> hifive_07, $100 to $327
> 22222222, $100 to $225, with only 1.4K followers
> escobarpablo, $100 to $206
copyfomo: t.me/copyfomo_bot?start=ref_…
what actually got me is the gap between the first two.
donnydicey and hifive_07 made almost the same money this month, $513K and $464K. but donnydicey did it on $105K of volume, hifive_07 on $204K.
nearly $5 back for every dollar traded against a bit over $2. the $100 numbers are built on that ratio, so two PnLs that look the same end up as $589 and $327.
most people copy whoever’s on top of the leaderboard today. half of them are red on the 7 or 30 day window.
one catch before anyone hits copy: all four last traded 8-21 days ago, so check they’re still active first.
$400 to $1,347 didn’t come from the biggest PnL on the board. it came from the traders who got the most out of every dollar.