[A Must-Know Fact Before Buying Daosfun Projects] When purchasing Daosfun projects, ignoring the liquidity differences between platforms can lead to significant losses. Check out the following case to stay alert. 1️⃣ What is Liquidity Difference? The liquidity for the same project can vary greatly between platforms like Daosfun and Raydium. Overlooking this can result in unexpected losses. 2️⃣ A Real-Life Example Left Image: A user purchased 35 SOL worth of tokens on Raydium, which had low liquidity. Right Image: An MEV bot bought the same tokens for just 13 SOL on Daosfun (with sufficient liquidity) and sold them on Raydium, earning 31 SOL in profit. 3️⃣ The Outcome? Regular User: 35 SOL investment → 12 SOL return 😱 23 SOL loss (65% loss). MEV Bot: 13 SOL investment → 31 SOL return 🤑 18 SOL profit (138% gain). The Project: Lost valuable holders. 💔 💔65% Loss! If such situations persist, genuine holders may leave, and the project’s credibility could be severely impacted. Always check liquidity differences between platforms when purchasing Daosfun projects! Is there a way to solve this problem? 👉 @baoskee @daosdotfun

RT @DOKDODAO: DOKDO × MEMECORE Lotte World Ticket Giveaway Event ☑️ Event Reward ↳ Lotte World Tickets: 2 tickets per person × 100 winners…

I’m paying attention to the upcoming solana:Aybt5BWuW6kMNt7Jk1UmSgLzpEKev5pEnh82TA5rpump sale because it’s an important step in @jumperapp’s expansion into a broader onchain finance app. The sale is taking place on @legiondotcc, and these are the main terms: • Opens: September 29, 2026, at 13:00 UTC • Closes: October 2, 2026, at 13:00 UTC • FDV: $75 million • Raise target: $2 million, with a $3 million hard cap • Payment: USDC on Ethereum The public-sale vesting schedule is also worth understanding before participating. Buyers receive 50% of their sale allocation at TGE, while the remaining 50% is released monthly over four months. TGE is currently expected in Q4 2026. That means the sale window and the token unlock schedule are two separate things. Participating in September doesn’t mean receiving a fully unlocked position immediately. For Republic participants, there is a chance to win an allocation. It’s an opportunity to be selected, and allocation is not guaranteed. Separately, submitting a pledge through the sale process also does not guarantee that the requested amount will be allocated. What interests me is how Jumper connects its existing product activity with the next stage of development. The sale provides the funding opportunity; execution on the product and token utility will determine how that story develops afterward. Official sale page: app.legion.cc/app/invest/jum…

When trading onchain, the gap between the price on your screen and the execution you actually receive matters. The larger the trade, the more noticeable that gap becomes. That’s what makes Jumper Advanced from @jumperapp interesting to me. According to its official introduction, Advanced includes transaction simulation to preview expected output, price impact and gas costs; Smart Slippage that adjusts to the trading pair’s conditions; Jumper Flow that splits large orders across liquidity sources; and limit orders. Together, these features give users more information before execution and more control over their trades. They show how Jumper is expanding into the trading experience itself. For a dated activity snapshot, Jumper’s July 2026 update reported $1.02B in transaction volume during that month. The scope of that number matters. Jumper is the consumer-facing application. LI.FI provides routing infrastructure used by multiple apps and wallets. Jumper’s monthly volume and the cumulative volume across LI.FI’s infrastructure therefore belong to different reporting scopes. User metrics need the same care. Monthly active users measure activity within a month under the publisher’s methodology. Cumulative unique wallets count addresses across time. One person can use multiple wallets, so those figures are not interchangeable. And July’s $1.02B represents the value of assets processed. It is not Jumper’s revenue or profit. What I want to see next is whether Advanced encourages repeat usage. Better execution can give users a reason to return. Whether that activity translates into actual fee revenue is a separate question that needs its own evidence. That connection between product quality, repeat usage and monetization is how I’ll assess Jumper’s expansion. Official sources: Jumper Advanced: jumper.xyz/learn/introducing… July 2026 update: jumper.xyz/learn/jumper-mont… LI.FI and Jumper’s business distinction — January 12, 2024: li.fi/knowledge-hub/li-fi-20…

The $75M valuation got my attention. Jumper’s approach to the token is what made me look further. @jumperapp says there is no Jumper equity. The stated intention is for users, contributors and investors to participate in the project’s growth through the same asset: $JUMP. That makes the connection between the product and the token particularly interesting. Here’s the setup for the sale on @legiondotcc: • September 29, 13:00 UTC → October 2, 13:00 UTC • USDC on Ethereum • $2M target / $3M hard cap • $75M FDV, implying $0.075 per token • 50% unlocked at TGE, with the remaining 50% released monthly over four months • TGE expected in Q4 2026 Allocation is worth paying attention to as well. Submitting a pledge does not guarantee a fill. Jumper says higher XP levels and the top 500 on the waitlist receive priority, so the community’s existing participation matters. My main question from here is how the token connects to actual activity. The materials outline fee discounts, reward multipliers and service perks. Other value mechanisms are still subject to final design, so there is more to evaluate as those details become concrete. I like the direction of putting stakeholders around one asset. The next step is showing how increased usage creates a lasting reason to hold and use it. That’s the part of $JUMP I’ll be watching.