CHUSSIΞ (@0xChussie) header
CHUSSIΞ (@0xChussie) profile picture

hungry degen

Onchain
Joined November 2021
Photo by CHUSSIΞ (@0xChussie)Photo by CHUSSIΞ (@0xChussie)Photo by CHUSSIΞ (@0xChussie)Photo by CHUSSIΞ (@0xChussie)Photo by CHUSSIΞ (@0xChussie)Photo by CHUSSIΞ (@0xChussie)Photo by CHUSSIΞ (@0xChussie)Photo by CHUSSIΞ (@0xChussie)Photo by CHUSSIΞ (@0xChussie)Photo by CHUSSIΞ (@0xChussie)
buy all coins
23
people shiting on @blknoiz06 so much that they made me buy solana:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump for the first time
1
41
CHUSSIΞ retweeted
Reminder: doomers are fucking losers and never win at anything
23
23
2
286
10,845
CHUSSIΞ retweeted
pay attention when bitcoin:native is stronger then the rest
1
30
people forgot about ethereum:0xec53bf9167f50cdeb3ae105f56099aaab9061f83 lets run it up on 1000x
1
51
pay attention when bitcoin:native is stronger then the rest
1
30
biggest bull confirmation will happen when gta comes out and no one is paying attention to the markets lol
1
40
buy the blood on the bluechips and u will be just fine. whole AI fud is bs.
35
CHUSSIΞ retweeted
Suppose that once a week, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to £100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this: The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing. The fifth would pay £1. The sixth would pay £3. The seventh would pay £7. The eighth would pay £12. The ninth would pay £18. And the tenth man (the richest) would pay £59.  So, that’s what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every week and seemed quite happy with the arrangement until, one day, the owner caused them a little problem. “Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the cost of your weekly beer by £20.” Drinks for the ten men would now cost just £80. The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free but what about the other six men? The paying customers? How could they divide the £20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share? They realized that £20 divided by six is £3.33, but if they subtracted that from everybody’s share then not only would the first four men still be drinking for free but the fifth and sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.  So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fairer to reduce each man’s bill by a higher percentage. They decided to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay. And so, the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (a 100% saving). The sixth man now paid £2 instead of £3 (a 33% saving). The seventh man now paid £5 instead of £7 (a 28% saving). The eighth man now paid £9 instead of £12 (a 25% saving). The ninth man now paid £14 instead of £18 (a 22% saving). And the tenth man now paid £49 instead of £59 (a 16% saving).  Each of the last six was better off than before with the first four continuing to drink for free.  But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings. “I only got £1 out of the £20 saving,” declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, “but he got £10!“  “Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a £1 too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!”  “That’s true!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get £10 back, when I only got £2? The wealthy get all the breaks!”  “Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison, “we didn’t get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!” The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.  The next week the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had their beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important – they didn’t have enough money between all of them to pay for even half of the bill!  And that’s how it works. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy and they just might not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.  For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.
179
1,085
128
4,676
229,120
Nike going out of business cause Trump stopped giving free money to black people is the funniest thing he has done
BREAKING: Nike stock, $NKE, crashes another -6% to its lowest level since September 2013 after posting weaker than expected earnings. The stock is now down -82% from its record high, erasing -$230 billion in market cap.
215
1,247
21
33,178
998,024
everything converges to $KNTQ
Yesterday on @jaymesrosenthal live stream I said I was EXTREMELY interested in backing up the truck to buy whatever memecoin launchpad token looked like it'd dominate @Enter_Elysium after seeing the initial success of robinhood:0x39dbed3a2bd333467115de45665cc57f813c4571 on RH Chain or even this solana:pumpCmXqMfrsAkQ5r49WcJnRayYRqmXz6ae8H7H9Dfn rally... And you're telling me that token just ends up being kinetiq:native anyway??? We have an L2 that's accretive to the L1 and now a launchpad that's accretive to the L2? Even after volumes largely collapsed, robinhood:0x39dbed3a2bd333467115de45665cc57f813c4571 is making ~$1.5m a day in fees. If @AscendLaunch does just 10% of those fees, it'd burn 15-20% of the current kinetiq:native market cap in a year. Just the memecoin launchpad...not the sequencer fees...not @Markets_xyz...not $HYPE staking revenue...none of the other business lines that are all reinforced by the Elysium ecosystem. The issue with the HyperEVM and the related tokens this whole time is that you needed to think they'd outperform $HYPE itself. The bull case for kinetiq:native is that you don't even need to bet that beta chasers will buy it alongside you, you just need to bet that people will use @Enter_Elysium, and that will torch both $HYPE and kinetiq:native in the process. kinetiq:native is a pure play that the largest DEX in the world will have the largest on chain ecosystem alongside it.
124
CHUSSIΞ retweeted
tokenized stonks on @Enter_Elysium are going to be super fucking fun
15
8
4
165
8,781
stop posting things when coins pump, u just remind everyone to take profit lol, stay silent ^^
1
45
CHUSSIΞ retweeted
i think ppl are sleeping on $MONEY regardless of the meta/narrative of the cycle, stablecoin usage increases. eUSD is dollar minted against SPY fully collateralized reserves disclosed later, they will add other stocks/ETFs, gold in the reserve too. the current product and yield comes from the trading fees generated with the $money token - 30% buys the token - 60% pays real SPY yield to those that mint/stake eUSD and $money - 10% funds the protocol this is not their only product, the plan is to keep launching more revenue generating products that increase the yield given to eUSD minters/stakers. they want to build an ecosystem of fee sources. dev bg also pretty stacked, being former gitcoin core dev. last time i saw smth this interesting, defi wise, was $NET allocated accordingly.
16
9
5
96
17,595
CHUSSIΞ retweeted
Replying to @0xdetweiler
beras can suck my boner
1
1
67
CHUSSIΞ retweeted
The price action is Premium. Excited for V2 to launch and see their stock reserve grow with actual Penny Stock shares. Good things take time.
4
11
85
3,547
robinhood:0x0a8b4763c71ac39101b3b8a97e62da0b81549a4f
been digging deeper into own.money / $MONEY and imo the easiest way to understand it is as a degen credit layer for tokenized stocks Robinhood brought assets like SPY onchain, Own lets you actually make that exposure productive instead of selling your SPY when you need liq, you deposit it into Own and mint eUSD against it. min collateral ratio is 150%, so youre basically unlocking dollars against your SPY exposure w/o selling it and thats an important diff vs something like Aave. on Aave youre borrowing stablecoins supplied by other users, on Own youre minting eUSD directly against your own SPY collateral so basically: SPY -> collateral -> eUSD liquidity then $MONEY is what connects the product into the flywheel $MONEY trades against SPY on Pons V2 and the trading fees are collected in SPY. those fees are split 30/70 30% -> buys + burns $MONEY 70% -> goes into the buffer used to pay SPY rewards to eUSD stakers but if you want to maximize your share of those rewards, you need to stake $MONEY. and imo thats the important part more eUSD users -> more demand to buy + stake MONEY for the boost -> more MONEY trading -> more SPY fees -> more MONEY bought + burned + more SPY rewards for stakers so the flywheel actually runs through the token itself and the rewards are paid in SPY instead of newly printed MONEY, so its not the usual defi setup where you stake the token and just get paid in more inflationary token SPY creates the collateral, eUSD creates the dollar liq, MONEY increases your share of the yield and MONEY trading creates the fees that fund both the burns + SPY rewards imo thats the cleanest way to understand it you keep your SPY exposure, unlock dollars against it, and if you want to maximize the yield on that eUSD you need to buy + stake MONEY that creates more MONEY trading, which creates more fees, which burns MONEY and funds the SPY rewards that made ppl want the boost in the first place thats the flywheel
1
194
and u think this is not gonna be the main eco runner solana:CFNRDaxFcvRwRSNnA5cHrCCr6AHhk9dNkHWpRUjNupFL
Replying to @LaunchOnSF
100% a launchpad created by @Raydium btw
1
115
too many cats
42