@StandardDraft

Draft and negotiate contracts in a matter of clicks 📃 Please reach out to join the private beta of our agreement acceleration platform

Joined April 2022
Standard Draft retweeted
“Programming is like a more precise language than language.” Will AI adoption in knowledge work follow the same path as AI adoption in software development (where the “GitHub co-pilot effect” has taken hold)? @bgurley, @altcap, and @levie explore the distinctions within different verticals that weigh on this question. They point to traits of software development that made it uniquely suited to quick AI adoption: 🔵 a workflow that is contained to a linear text interface (and thus, “perfect for next-line prediction”); 🔵 the fact that most of the knowledge of the software development field is public, open source, and available for training runs; 🔵 the precision of code (love the Bill Gurley quote here, “programming is like a more precise language than language”); and 🔵 the fact that code is automatically and instantly testable. There are of course many other factors in the mix (e.g., software developers are often more risk-averse and willing to test new technology compared to knowledge workers like lawyers), but the list above is really interesting to consider. I view each of the traits as tied with one another. In a vacuum, it would seem like the first trait (linear text interface that is well-suited for next line prediction) would hold true for legal work, like contract drafting. Consider the *many* contract co-pilot products (based in Microsoft Word) that are coming to market. But clearly the process of drafting and editing a contract (along with many other legal workflows) do not satisfy the “precision” and “automatically and instantly testable” traits of software development. Does that really matter? And to what extent does that impact how AI tools should be built for legal work?
1
3
548
Standard Draft retweeted
“For a VC industry that prizes innovation, it is somewhat ironic that the primary development in VC contracting since 2004 is one of standardization.” A recent paper by Robert Bartlett, a professor at Stanford Law School, examined the standardization of venture capital (VC) contracts since the release of the National Venture Capital Association (NVCA) model contract forms in 2003. Shared some thoughts over on LinkedIn! linkedin.com/posts/ryan-sami…
1
1
4
521
Standard Draft retweeted
Excited for this event @uclaanderson tomorrow! I'll be sharing thoughts about AI in the legal industry and will demo @StandardDraft's AI functionality. Event link in next tweet.
2
2
4
478
Standard Draft retweeted
Replying to @StandardDraft
@StandardDraft is evolving in a more technical direction and we are hiring a Founding Chief Technical Officer, and/or Founding Engineer, to join the team! Please see here for the job description: notion.so/standard-draft/Sta…
2
2
5
205
Standard Draft retweeted
Who did I miss in the legal x AI market map? Tag them below ⬇️ We at @lightspeedvp believe now is an exciting time to build in legal tech x AI as a confluence of tech and business factors have finally paved the way for meaningful disruption in the market. lsvp.com/legaltech-x-ai-the-… We've put together some thoughts on: - The “why now” to build outsized opportunities in legal tech - Market areas we are most excited about - Common pitfalls to avoid that we see from founders building in legal x AI - Musings on the evolution of the industry over time If you're building in the legal x AI space, I'd love to chat so please reach out :) [email protected]
15
15
7
93
29,281
Standard Draft retweeted
It started with a late night LinkedIn connection request: "Looks like we're both LA-based early stage legal tech founders. Thought it'd be good to connect!" From there, a friendship with @baristaatlaw (of @corporahq) was born. youtube.com/watch?v=wlB6l4Xv…
1
1
7
330
Standard Draft retweeted
In the whirlwind of AI commentary, there’s a growing buzz around its potential in the legal sector. The title of a recent @NFX article says it all: “AI is Reinventing the Legal Industry” See here for a breakdown of frameworks to consider! linkedin.com/feed/update/urn…
2
7
715
Standard Draft retweeted
Today's process of drafting and negotiating contracts – from routine NDAs to commercial MSAs to complex SPAs – is broken. @StandardDraft accelerates the process of reaching agreement. More focus on contract decisions at the key point level. Less waste on *everything else*
2
2
1
17
818
We are thrilled with the response, product usage, and conversations that have resulted from our private beta announcement. Please reach out if you're interested in exploring @StandardDraft!
Fellow denizens of X (rip twitter), I'm very excited to share that @StandardDraft is in private beta! Please watch this video to learn more about the problem we're solving and to see our initial product in action. If GIFs are more your speed, then please read the 🧵below!
1
1
4
1,097
Standard Draft retweeted
Interesting times. Yesterday, @balajis tweets about 'copilot for corporations' (thanks for showing me this @callmehouck). Today, @GundersonLaw, a leading Silicon Valley law firm, announces a Gen AI app (link in next tweet) that seems to cover a lot of what @balajis mentioned.
COPILOT FOR CORPORATIONS How do you double the value of cloud storage? Add AI summarization of PDFs, thereby allowing businesses to replace millions in legal bills with thousands in SaaS fees. It’d be like Github Copilot, but for corporations. As context, every founder and investor has at least one huge directory of PDFs. Your corporate bylaws, your employment agreements, your investment docs — this folder is essentially a database of contracts. But right now, this crucial database can only be read one file at a time, and often only by a legal expert. Yeah, you can do keyword search, but that’s not quite the same thing as comprehending a 200 page PDF summarizing an acquisition. So what people do today is: pay expensive lawyers to ask questions about the docs. This is the most expensive search engine in the world, often costing hundreds of dollars per query, and taking hours if not days between each query. But now there’s an alternative. OpenAI has added several AI PDF readers as plugins to GPT4. And while they’re early and finicky and often can’t read many PDFs due to OCR and other issues, they are amazing when they work. The next step is to just bring that tech in situ. We need to make it run in the background of every cloud storage app, so you don’t need to manually upload countless PDFs to a new service. That means configurable AI summarization of every PDF, every folder of PDFs, every folder of folders. You might set up some prompts to run on every PDF (“what’s this document about in one sentence”), and others from collections of related PDFs (“read all these employment agreements and generate a table of salaries”). You could even have AI suggest automatic, consistent titles for all files. These prompts would execute asynchronously upon file upload, like video encoding. So you wouldn’t put a ton of load on the server, and it would process your files when it had a chance. Moreover, you’d have to set up the privacy settings just right, but once you did…the AI that read *all* of your PDFs would be like your corporate lawyer. They’d know everything about your entity and its history and be available day or night to answer questions — in seconds for a few cents, rather than days for many dollars. Of course, this doesn’t put good lawyers out of work. It just allows them to focus on higher order questions. And they could still be cc’d (at much lower cost) to provide attorney/client privilege on every AI question you ask. Still, as PDF sharing is perhaps the number one enterprise use case for cloud storage, reducing legal expenses could be a huge growth opportunity for Zoho (@svembu), Box (@levie), and Dropbox (@drewhouston). If they shift just a few billable hours of legal work per year per person into SaaS fees for cloud, that could easily be +$1000/year. These companies even have their own internal corporate document collections to use as training data, to dogfood the product and generate the top 5 most useful prompts for different kinds of document collections. Anyway, all of this is probably obvious to them and I wouldn’t be surprised if they are already working on it. But if not — first thing we do, let’s automate all the lawyers.
1
1
1
5
2,503
Ever stumble across a forgotten folder or gdoc and feel the nostalgia of an old project? From the (actually somewhat recent) archives: designing the @StandardDraft landing page
344
Standard Draft retweeted
I'm looking forward to being in NYC next week to speak on a couple panels at the Automation Conference hosted by @EY_US and @LegalTechHub1!
1
3
14
1,107
Standard Draft retweeted
Putting aside the fact that using GPT to produce complex contracts is terrible advice, there seems to be a prevalent view that generating an initial draft is the *only* part of the contract process or the *hardest* part. This is … inaccurate.
"Do not go to law school. The legal field is in big trouble. That's going to be one of the first disrupted by AI," says @GeoffLewisOrg. "I talk to folks who spend thousands of dollars a week on legal bills, they're already using ChatGPT to generate complex contracts."
7
7
1
20
3,256
Standard Draft retweeted
After thousands of hours of working on contracts, interviewing key stakeholders, sharing designs, and building product, I have never been more confident in the @StandardDraft vision. Simply put, this is a problem worth solving. More updates soon. Stay tuned!
1
1
206
Standard Draft retweeted
I recently asked ChatGPT to come up with ‘corporate speak’ alternatives to the phrase “in the lab, cooking.” Here’s the best it could do: “in the innovation hub, crafting solutions.” Terminology aside, the sentiment remains…
1
1
4
569
Standard Draft retweeted
Ever wonder why groundbreaking tech can sometimes lead to increased *complexity* instead of increased simplicity? With today's breakneck speed of AI proliferation, should we watch out for contexts where this phenomenon may occur? History has some lessons for us... 🧵
3
3
1
5
1,259
Standard Draft retweeted
🎯 The age of 'AI ping-pong' is nearing... Totally agree with the points made by @prestonjbyrne in this thread. I made a similar argument in an article I wrote back in Dec (linking in the next tweet). Applying AI to certain legal processes may bury us deeper in dysfunction.
Replying to @prestonjbyrne
Law firms that master AI and represent parties with leverage will effectively swamp the other side with deal language which will force the other side to AI power-up too just to keep pace. It’ll happen overnight.
1
1
3
746
Standard Draft retweeted
I keep coming across legal tech product demos (particularly AI) highlighting the fact that their solution creates numerous (sometimes countless!) versions of the same contract clause... Here are 5 alternatives of a Governing Law provision! 10 versions of a Late Payments clause!
2
3
1
15
2,735