ソフィア

London ロンドン, ex-San Francisco
Joined December 2006
On GB News two nights ago Paul Richards was advocating for conscription and for “pro Russian voices” to be thrown in jail, including those saying “don’t go to war for Burnham” Paul Richards is the Treasurer of the Fabian Society and has previously served as a Labour special adviser. Please consider this A senior figure within Labour was on national television talking about locking ordinary British people up for voicing opposition to World War III and he was supported in his views by GB News host and Tory politician Jacob Rees-Mogg. People should be extremely concerned when influential political figures start talking so casually about imprisoning people for opposing the government and opposing a war. This is a clear threat to our rights of freedom of speech and democracy. Source: The Fabian Society Exposed. I think the sheep’s clothing worn by the Fabian wolves is now wearing a bit thin.
516
3,343
124
8,655
87,069
This is absolutely brilliant from Laurence Fox It's a perfect moment to demonstrate not only how intolerant Islam is but also it proves the entire Oxford Union audience know as well despite pretending otherwise Laurence is about to unveil an image of the Prophet Muhammad, the whole audience are in suspense, there are interruptions, they plead with him, they try to shut him down, the rules come out, there is an intake of breath You can tell the room is completely on edge from this! Because they know if he does, his life will be at risk and the Oxford Union may well be at risk too from the supposedly tolerant religion the other side are defending Proving Laurence's point, that Islam is not compatible with our society at all I won't ruin what happens you will have to watch for yourselves but Laurence's trick here is absolutely brilliant and well worth 3 minutes of your time Enjoy And @LozzaFox take a bow sir 👏
732
7,676
358
43,174
1,577,554
🚨NEWS: In one of his last acts as Prime Minister, Keir Starmer secretly authorised extending the National Insurance exemption for Indian workers to 5 years This means it will be cheaper to pay Indians for jobs than Brits in the UK You cannot hate this man enough
549
8,474
267
37,407
476,899
Apology not accepted. Nothing to do with facts. You called that great woman, just slaughtered, an “old maid”, a “virgin”, a “spinster”. Language which gave away your horrible misogyny. You would NEVER have described a 78-year old man as “bachelor” let alone “virgin”. It was unforgivable. As Ann would have said: “APP-ALL-LLING”!
AN APOLOGY I was seriously wrong and insensitive in one of the several media appearances I made yesterday in reaction to the death of Ann Widdecombe. I got the timing and tone of my initial word portrait of her wrong. Of course I shared, and share, the horror at her murder and the respect for her remarkable and feisty political career. I also know that many people loved her for her subsequent showbiz stardom. Her untimely death is a horrible thing. My mistaken view was that in the context of rolling news coverage, I was being asked to contribute as an obituarist who has known her and interacted with her since the 1980s. This approach was premature. At no point was I expressing my personal feelings about her, that's not what I do. I was discussing her life in the round, based on the record of known facts and what she has said about herself, along with some recollections of our personal interactions. My choice of words on the spur of the moment was clumsy. I did not intend to offend though obviously I did.
383
2,560
59
16,791
390,257
The most important speech given in that parliament for a very long time.
I want the world to hear what we heard.
96
2,164
36
13,839
183,908
There is a serious problem with the British police.
37
565
13
1,971
51,857
What our 'leaders' will never talk about: In the last week alone, in the UK, in just one week, we've gone from reading about the 27-year-old mother Rhiannon Whyte, stabbed in the head 20 times by an illegal migrant from Sudan, to Wayne Broadhurst, stabbed to death by an illegal from Afghanistan while walking his dog, to a small boat illegal migrant stabbing a stranger to death in a bank in Derby, to a migrant from Afghanistan strangling a railway worker over a minor ticket dispute, to a Syrian illegal migrant sexually assaulting a student in Cardiff, to illegal migrants chasing migrant hotel workers with knives "because they didn't like the food", to 10 people suffering a mass stabbing on a train at the hands of two Black "British" men for no apparent reason. Why is this happening? Because our so-called 'leaders' have been importing millions of people from highly violent, conflict-ridden, and, yes, inferior 'honour cultures' from the Third World, where settling grievances through violence is standard As the academic Garrett Jones points out in his book: "When a nation imports people, it imports the average cultural traits of those people". Mass uncontrolled immigration is not just the importing of people; it is the importing of cultures And the cultures we are importing are not just radically different and incompatible to our own but are visibly inferior, primitive, stuck in cultural codes and practices we moved on from hundreds of years ago It is, to quote @GadSaad, "suicidal empathy" --our leaders think they are helping these people when in fact they are killing their own society, country and people from within None of this can be said in Westminster where universal liberalism --"all cultures are equal"--reigns supreme. This is what you saw on Question Time this week, when I was widely attacked by a liberal ruling class that cares more about helping people from backward cultures than defending its own people But it's effects can clearly be seen in the extent to which 1st and 2nd generation migrants here in the UK, who we are told are "British", "nice boys from Cardiff", turn out to be highly violent criminals, continuing the cultural traits from their origin countries Again, nobody in Westminster wants to think about this point about culture But look: 2025 Manchester synagogue terrorist Syrian parents 2024 Southport terrorist Rwandan parents 2021 Liverpool terrorist Born in Iraq 2021 Sir David Amess terrorist Parents from Somalia 2020 Reading terrorist Born in Libya 2020 Streatham terrorist Parents from Sri Lanka 2019 Usman Khan terrorist Parents from Pakistan 2017 Manchester MEN terrorist Libyan parents 2015 Leytonstone terrorist Born in Somalia 2013 Lee Rigby/Woolwich terrorist Parents Nigerian 2007 London/Glasgow terrorists Iraqi/Indian parents 2005 "homegrown" 7/7 terrorists Shehzad Tanweer, parents from Pakistan Mohammad Khan, parents from Pakistan Hasib Hussain, parents from Pakistan Germaine Lyndsay, born in Jamaica No other society in the world would tolerate this --would do to its own people what our leaders are doing to us Could you imagine, say, the United Arab Emirates, Japan, China doing this? Of course not. Because they are not idiots; they do not tolerate suicidal empathy. Through mass immigration, porous borders and a total failure to integrate newcomers, our leaders have made us much less safe and put our own people at risk These migrants do not instantly adopt the host country's 'British' or 'English' culture and identity the moment they sign a few papers Far from it They retain central aspects of their origin countries --including religion, belief, attitudes toward violence, hatred of non-believers, and so on This is what the rape gang scandal was about; we imported clan-based networks from rural Pakistan that think non-believers are fair game and distrust authority The vast majority of radical Islamists in Britain were either born abroad or trace their roots back on these islands only one generation, while living in 'closed' social networks filled with other people from their origin countries, which reinforce these different cultures This is then further enabled by an idiotic ruling class and woke left that pursues virtue and social status for itself by proclaiming platitudes like "diversity is a success" while also having to use speech codes --"far right", "racist", and so on--to shut down any dissent Then it uses multiculturalism to encourage minorities to remain distinctive and separate from the majority, even prioritising them over the majority It is all completely insane This is what the UK has now been doing for 30 years, under Labour and the Tories, the Uniparty, importing radically different if not incompatible cultures which then persist across generations And today this is being compounded by importing 180,000 unvetted illegal migrants into the country in just 7 years, with another 180,000 forecast to arrive by the next general election if the average trend continues Just think about that --by the next election we will be talking about 400,000 unvetted illegal migrants roaming around the country, many from the same highly violent, conflict-prone societies as the ones that have given us all of the chaos above And so in the years ahead this chaos will only increase, it will only get worse, because our leaders refuse to see this reality and make changes In short, every terrorist attack, every stabbing, every rape, every sexual assault, every rape gangs, is a reminder of the fact our leaders, who are supposed to defend us, are importing people who hate who we are and cling to totally different cultures, identities, and outlooks, all of which is making our own culture, identity, and social cohesion harder to maintain We can either keep ignoring the critical importance of culture or we can do something about it What would "doing something about it" look like? Radically reshaping our country and its future around people who have deep roots and ties to this country Rewarding those who genuinely integrate, removing those who do not Ending the extreme policy of mass uncontrolled immigration Doing whatever is necessary to fix our borders --leave ECHR, repeal HRA, detain and deport End soft-on-crime policies Launch an all-out assault on radical, violent Islamism We have a choice. We can do these things or we can keep killing ourselves from within.
1,157
6,374
443
24,290
2,528,370
On the day Starmer announced mandatory Digital ID the Bank of England and UK banks started working on CBDC’s under the control of the Bank of International Settlement. Digital ID is just part of the control matrix we are being trapped in, which includes carbon credits and CBDC’s.
121
1,438
42
3,273
93,300
An absolute must watch. Energy bosses have just told Parliament that EVEN IF gas prices halved by 2030, the soaring policy costs of renewables would mean bills go UP. Ed Miliband’s plan means more grid, more expensive renewable subsidies, more paying wind farms to turn off.
617
4,500
565
12,539
1,239,069
Digital ID for every adult is not progress. It is the end of a free society dressed up as convenience. I am a cyber security specialist. This is my take. They are selling it as a fix for illegal migration. That is bollocks. We spend hundreds of billions a year on cyber security and yet the volume of breaches is breaking records. The threat is growing faster than the spend. Digital ID will not stop boats. It will not stop trafficking gangs. It will not fix a broken border. 
Criminals will work around it. Honest citizens will pay the price. It builds giant data banks that track where you go, what you buy, what you read and who you speak to. 
It links your identity to every checkpoint in daily life. 
One breach and your life is exposed. Look at Jaguar Land Rover and the airports in recent weeks. Now imagine that at national scale on an ID system tied to everything you need to live your daily life. Here is the risk that ministers will not admit. 
Ransomware seeded through a supplier or an insider: 
It lies quiet for months.
It rolls through the backups.
On trigger day the register and the recovery sets are both encrypted. 
Payments fail. Health and benefits stall. Borders slow. Citizens are frozen out until a ransom is paid or the state rebuilds from scratch. 
Centralise identity and you centralise failure. Do not fall for the pitch. Function creep is certain.
It starts as login. 
It becomes access to money, travel, speech and public services. 
It turns rights into permissions controlled by the state and its contractors. 
It creates a single point of failure for criminals, insiders and hostile states to target. 
It will punish the elderly, the poor and anyone who is not always online. 
It will centralise risk and outsource blame. 
It will not stop fraud. 
It will not stop illegal migration. 
It will build the machinery for a social credit system by stealth. If ministers cared about the border, they would enforce current laws, resource patrols and processing, close loopholes and remove those with no right to stay. 
You do not need a national ID to do any of that. We scrapped ID cards in 2010 for a reason. 
Britain does not need a central register to prove age or status. 
Yes to privacy first proofs. No to a database state.
1,009
12,891
964
36,680
1,471,465
Everyone is talking about Starmer's digital id cards and therefore no one is talking about Starmer's £750,000 donation 'mistake'. See how it works.
229
4,207
89
17,788
243,120
No words. A story from the Britannia Hotel 👇
109
479
130
1,350
172,648
Thatcher always had Labours number. Rings very true today, doesnt it?
269
2,209
171
7,846
235,837
That time of year again, will it be burned down or not? It'll be a lit countdown to Christmas
A king needs his crown. It feels good to be bock. 👑
7
2
15
64,132
Bombshell New Report Shows 64% of Palestinian Refugees Taken in by Denmark in 1992 Now Have Criminal Records “34% of their children had obtained criminal records…and the vast majority were living on welfare.”
99
607
70
1,186
231,855
Ah the summit for @wef puppets, both the King & PM included. This is not the best interests of the UK
The King has hosted a reception at Buckingham Palace, bringing together over 200 business leaders, decision makers and NGOs, ahead of the COP27 Summit in Egypt. His Majesty heard from guests about practical measures to combat climate change and their plans for COP27 and beyond.
1
4
It's a really a dumb a la FB move by @signalapp to remove the SMS integration. Just because a loud minority that can't tell the difference between a secure Signal message and SMS, you remove the feature? Bare minimum is to keep it as option. Signal is loosing a strong USP
1
3
In the name of 'safety': #authoritarian @LloydsBank this is 100% wrong: To help keep your money safe, we may ask you to confirm if a payment is genuine. We may decide not to make the payment until you have confirmed to us it’s genuine or we may give you more time to cancel it.
5