{ BBA ~ MBA | Gamer 🎮 } Opinions are my own. Co-founder @ThalozUS 🇺🇦 💙💛 #StandWithUkraine #NearshoreTalent #Recruiting #AI_Teams

Montevideo, Uruguay
Joined September 2007
🫡
Brocktober in full effect‼️ @SAP | #FTTB
5
I don't have nearly enough tokens to play with all of this God damnit.
9
Pablo García retweeted
Great.. now i have to invest into claric a new system one model for extracting values... STOP RELEASING COOL NEW THINGS, ITS A HUGE PAIN IN THE ASS
36
9
608
37,641
Since the American President announced the energy ceasefire a week ago, Russia has deliberately attacked Ukraine’s energy and oil and gas sectors 76 times. Last night alone, there were strikes on substations in the Vinnytsia, Zhytomyr, Khmelnytskyi, and Odesa regions. Tens of thousands of families remain without power. Energy workers and repair crews are working virtually around the clock to restore electricity supply. Overnight, the Russians also struck residential buildings in our regions. As of now, 12 people have been reported injured, including two children. Two people have been killed. My condolences to their families and loved ones. This morning, there was a strike on an agricultural enterprise in Volyn. All necessary services are working at the site. In total, over this past week, the Russians have attacked Ukraine with almost 2,700 attack drones, 1,700 aerial bombs, and 66 missiles, most of them ballistic. The main targets of these strikes are energy facilities – the Russians are trying to cause a blackout. And America should see that Russia is not taking any reciprocal steps in response to sanctions relief or agreements. On the contrary, they take every signal of an opportunity to make money as proof that their bet on war is paying off and they can keep fighting. It is because of this position of Russia’s that the war continues, not because Ukraine is rightfully defending itself. It is Russia that must face pressure for peace to have a chance. Thank you to everyone who understands this and helps.
1,951
8,299
375
27,058
565,321
My god how many ads on "excuse me Jev can what?" "Anthropic just drop a course" do I have to ensure? Block Block Block 🙄
26
Pablo García retweeted
I no longer see any compelling reason to believe that taste is some permanent boundary LLMs won’t cross. It’s already happening.
610
396
270
7,847
704,920
Pablo García retweeted
I think I have experienced “AGI”… Just did a 30-minute “phone call” with @bot. Together we got back to about 20 emails, organised my calendar for the week, wrote a proposal for my team, ordered lunch for my family, booked (and paid for) a hotel, and arranged a cab to the airport. It also gave me some great advice along the way. Did it all 100% “hands free” with my baby fast asleep on my chest. If this is what life is like with superintelligence, I am all in.
111
178
27
2,555
483,265
We were able to fine tune an open weight model (Qwen3.5-9B) on proprietary internal data at @coinbase, and it out performed frontier models, at much lower cost and speed, for a specialized task (fraud prevention in this case). I think we'll see more of this pattern inside companies. The frontier models are amazing generalists. But increasingly you'll see specialist models out perform on more narrow tasks, either working on teams, or by themselves. We're making it easy to fine tune models internally for our employees. We even have a skill for it in our internal harness that makes it easy to spin these up and start training them: "/fine-tune-and-serve-llm I want to fine-tune Qwen for payments risk review. help me get started" I imagine we'll have some backend services that could be replaced entirely by this new architecture.
614
798
541
9,507
1,592,511
Doing the lord's work!
Ukraine hits another Yandex data center in Russia and Cloudflare data shows Russian bot traffic dropping dramatically. Might have an impact right before the November elections.
24
Pablo García retweeted
Introducing ChatGPT for Dishwashing GPT-6 achieves state-of-the-art results on dishwashing benchmarks for long-running jobs and difficult stains. The Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem is a $1 million challenge about whether the equations describing fluid motion can break down. In this video, I accidentally found a counter-example while trying to optimize my dishwasher. But in reality, OpenAI used 10,000 AI agents to find a proof in 88 hours: openai.com/index/navier-stok… Parody of the original GPT-6 Astra ad @OpenAI #ChatGPT_Partner #chatgpt Credits: Written and Directed by Joma Co-Writer - Henry Connor Coan IV @coan_henry Production by Dauntlus Studios @dauntlus.studios Producer/Co-Director - Marcus Liew @dauntlus Camera Operator - Amos Lee @amoselijahlee Art Director - Alethea Soo @aletheasoo Art Assistant - Alicia Lim @aliciatkl_ Assistant Editor - GPT-6 Astra Music: Tensions Run High by Soundridemusic youtube.com/watch?v=Ly9H63SL…
424
959
341
10,778
1,123,895
Pablo García retweeted
everything i know about managing agents i learned from the amazing programmers and computer scientists that came before constraints in your codebase are freeing for both humans and agents! this has always been true, but if you were a small dev team you likely never had to think that deeply because you could trust your fellow programmers to write code and review well but large companies have had to solve this problem since even before agents. because before you had agent slop, you had human slop. lots of engineers wrote bad code out of necessity (eg backend engineer forced to write frontend or reverse). the solution to this was constraints: lint rules, smarter compilers and diagnostics, high quality tests, investments into observability, and so on the arrival of agents just means that big company problems are now everyone's problems. the good news is that none of this is really that novel: it's just good engineering youtube.com/watch?v=GqmsQeSz…
135
187
34
2,872
278,203
This. The end user does not care about your pitch-perfect code. It solves a need or it does not. Whatever is more efficient at doing that wins. We like it or not.
codebases have always contained slop. we have always been okay with this because code rarely needs to be perfect, outside of mission critical "hard" (eg embedded) software. swe is a unique form of engineering because you're often building something that constantly evolves and is almost organic - user tastes change, your mental models evolve, and features come and go. admittedly, i and many others who've been coding for a long time were initially (like back in 2024) skeptical that agents would write production code. "but what about all the slop that would enter our beautiful codebase?". well, even before, we had human slop, and there was a lot of it! if we're being truthful, most people call "code i didn't write" slop. the reality is that 99% of people (i include myself in that number) don't even know what Good Code looks like, let alone be capable of writing it. i would propose that Good Code is: • correct • bug free • fast and cost efficient to run it has always been exceedingly difficult and expensive to write truly Good Code, because for the longest time (maybe @bendlang will change that), code was not something you could cheaply and formally guarantee to have all 3 of these properties. this is why writing hard software is much more difficult and expensive, because depending on the use case, you may only get one chance and so you have to be right from the start. but the vast majority of software we use does not need to be Good Code to provide value to users. in fact, it is very likely that most software we use is not formally verifiable! we accepted some bugs in exchange for velocity and progress, so we rely on tests and o11y instead and have adopted a more incremental approach. this is a good thing! agents help us move faster, and if you're open to the idea, are capable of helping us write better code. it won't be Good Code (that is still expensive), but it is likely to be much better on average at scale. the new craft of swe is to figure out how to do this. it's your job now! if your productivity with and without agents is not significantly different, you're doing something wrong. but it's not too late to embrace it and use it as an opportunity to learn a whole new skill tree
43
Pablo García retweeted
Je suis choqué comment ça rend bien :D
62
203
11
3,262
362,781
Pablo García retweeted
🌶️ fixed it only a fool would say AI is *creating* vulnerabilities faster than ever... the vulnerabilities were there already this is a chart about us *fixing* vulnerabilities faster than ever before... it's a chart about the internet becoming secure.
Cyber is having a moment Across 21 major software companies, including Apple, AWS, Microsoft, and Google: - Reported critical vulnerabilities never cleared 100 per month in four years - Since spring they've jumped to over 600 per month
17
30
5
148
14,696
So...I was using Opus in T3 Code to orchestrate 6.1 Sol subagents. It found other chats on my PC, and started coordinating them too. Then it found agents on my Laptop it couldn’t access… so it coordinated them through GitHub comments instead. Thx @jullerino We are cooked🍗
1
45
I'm 100% loving this feature. So much better than reading a wall of text. It makes a world of difference. Every feature that lowers the cognitive load while handling many agents is god sent.
We just shipped in-app visualization capabilities in T3 Code. This enables agents to build cool dynamic experiences within the thread. Huge shoutout to @davis7 for pushing us on this (and building most of it). Didn't expect to dig it so much.
2
38
Pablo García retweeted
There is some great irony in the fact that much of our current work getting the best out of agents sits in product management, project management, and QA. You could not have sold me on that bundle of goods a year ago! But speed changes everything.
75
36
9
1,159
62,004
Daily AI reminder: We are so cooked 🍗
19
Pablo García retweeted
You don't have to commit your entire life to optimism, just try it on for a week. Start thinking "what if it all worked out?" and "what a time to be alive!". Then compare your state of mind to the week before filled with pessimism and doomer nonsense.
285
765
118
8,092
367,526
Pablo García retweeted
It takes a while to build the confidence, but there's no future where you're manually reviewing every line of agent code. Not much acceleration in that. You need adversarial agent reviews, you need automated testing, and maybe you spot check. That's it. From prompt to production!
440
364
161
6,875
727,767